How was it bad? They sold very well, Izzy defended 185 not long after and Jan could have defended anytime.Neither Jan or Izzy deserved a super fight and it was completely pointless.
Bad for both of their respective divisions.
New rule : No title shot unless you have at least 2 fights in a division.
This is I think A. Silva did it the right way in that he went up and fought Irvin and Griffin but never got a title shot.
With this new rule no title shots for :
Izzy at LHW potentially holding up one division
Mcgregor at Light Weight, holding up both, and never defending either title
discuss
How was it bad? They sold very well, Izzy defended 185 not long after and Jan could have defended anytime.
dc was a double champ alreadyWME wanted a double champ so that they can expand to the African market - it didn't work.
New rule : No title shot unless you have at least 2 fights in a division.
This is I think A. Silva did it the right way in that he went up and fought Irvin and Griffin but never got a title shot.
With this new rule no title shots for :
Izzy at LHW potentially holding up one division
Mcgregor at Light Weight, holding up both, and never defending either title
discuss
Don't get me wrong, I still want to see Izzy vs Jones, as long as Jones in not the Champ in the division. I just think fighter should earn their place in the title picture.The whole idea was to set up a super fight between Izzy and Jones. Thankfully it failed.
WME wanted a double champ so that they can expand to the African market - it didn't work.
Dude, Migingo Island had at least 7 TV’s willing to trade for the PPV.LOL What African market?