- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 4,372
- Reaction score
- 1,428
Suppose it's a Vale Tudo fight. Is Eddie suppose to apologize then?I don't know if that's a good fight to prove your point. Mike Tyson was often a smaller fighter yet for a time was the most feared boxer.
Eddie was 67 lb heavier. Eddie was 37 years old while Marius was 48. Hall also delivered some illegal strikes to the back of the head which were not called and for which he apologized after the fight.
Is Jake Paul a superior boxer/fighter to Mike Tyson?
That's a silly thing to say. We can't just randomly change the fight rules after the fact. They agreed to a set of fight conditions and Eddie violated them. I believe him that it wasn't intentional but lets not minimize what he did.Suppose it's a Vale Tudo fight. Is Eddie suppose to apologize then?
So skill and power outweighs pure size and strength?Mike Tyson was good because he hit freaking hard like freight train hard.
Tyson would get absolutely mauled by todays boxers like Wilder.
He's probably a decent amateur but let's be honest, if he had to fight the typical pros he'd likely lose a lot of the fights and get nowhere. Joshua fight was just dumb because he was outclassed in every aspect(skills, size, strength, power, endurance)....It's embarrassing that he got gassed as the significantly smaller man..I actually do give Jake Paul credit for fighting a very good boxer but no of course he's not better than Tyson.
Even with in the rule set Pudz was getting rag dolled in that match.That's a silly thing to say. We can't just randomly change the fight rules after the fact. They agreed to a set of fight conditions and Eddie violated them. I believe him that it wasn't intentional but lets not minimize what he did.
power is a function of strength to me. Just because you are a big Human doesn't mean you are strong. Strength is displayed in many ways the just SBD.So skill and power outweighs pure size and strength?
With the AI technology today I am sure somebody somewhere has input all of the data and had a theoretical fight that is pretty close to the real thing but I agree it is just my opinion.I wouldn't underestimate Tyson's raw power. It's also pointless to debate hypotheticals.
I dont even think he's a good boxer at all. I just give him credit for entering into a fight he had basically no chance of winning and showing grit in that fight.He's probably a decent amateur but let's be honest, if he had to fight the typical pros he'd likely lose a lot of the fights and get nowhere. Joshua fight was just dumb because he was outclassed in every aspect(skills, size, strength, power, endurance)....It's embarrassing that he got gassed as the significantly smaller man..
lol you're jokingTyson would get absolutely mauled by todays boxers like Wilder.
Wilder being the example gets me. Usyk could be a hard fight Wilder is a can crusherlol you're joking
WIlder? Not so sure about that. And Wilder lost to Furey, whose overall strength levels seem to be rather mediocre.Tyson would get absolutely mauled by todays boxers like Wilder.
I'd say punching power is a consequence of:power is a function of strength to me. Just because you are a big Human doesn't mean you are strong. Strength is displayed in many ways the just SBD.
Tyson started falling apart after firing Kevin Rooney. Up to that point, he won everything, including against Larry Holmes.Wilder would knock out a prime Tyson in a heartbeat. Tyson lost to buster Douglas and any other real competion he faced. An aged Larry Holmes.
Well, strength isn't everything...Fury wins because he is a big ass lumberinh man that can take a punch and has just enough skill to get by.
I'd have to disagree here when it comes to fighting: what you have is explosiveness and strength, power is only expressed through technique.Having better technique just expresses the strength/power you have better.
Goes without saying.Furthermore having the wherewithal to fight not to lose , fight to win and fight to break your opponent is how you put on a good performance.
A strength metric? How is that measured? I'm genuinely curious.Rotational power in a punch is a strength metric btw.
I never said it wasn't. We have simply continued to disagree on how said qualities should be developed and measured.In grappling context isometric strength, explosive strength, muscle endurance is very important to maximize.
No one's arguing strength isn't important in martial arts this is the strength training section of a martial arts forum for God's sake. And for the record I'd argue conditioning is like neck and neck in terms of importance.Wilder would knock out a prime Tyson in a heartbeat. Tyson lost to buster Douglas and any other real competion he faced. An aged Larry Holmes.
Fury wins because he is a big ass lumberinh man that can take a punch and has just enough skill to get by.
Having better technique just expresses the strength/power you have better.
Furthermore having the wherewithal to fight not to lose , fight to win and fight to break your opponent is how you put on a good performance.
Rotational power in a punch is a strength metric btw.
In grappling context isometric strength, explosive strength, muscle endurance is veryimportant to maximize.
This is the most obvious observation anyone with two workings eyes can see.
That sounds very tech-intensive, which may explain why I never heard of it. I can contribute that the East German wrestling team came up with a number of specific machines designed to measure force in certain applications (e.g. the gut wrench machine, the suplex machine), but they never caught on. Much easier to see if you can turn or throw an opponent.Measuring rotational power in an athlete involves
assessing their ability to generate force quickly through a twisting motion. This is most commonly done using medicine balls, cable machines, or specialized, high-tech rotational assessment tools, focusing on metrics like speed, force, and power output.
Here are the primary methods used to measure rotational power:
1. Medicine Ball Throws
Medicine ball (med ball) tests are considered a practical and highly effective method for measuring sport-specific rotational power.
2. Rotational Cable Machines (e.g., Keiser)
- Rotational Medicine Ball Throws (Side/Rotational): The athlete stands perpendicular to a wall and throws a 2–3 kg (4–6 lbs) medicine ball against it using a, rotational motion.
- Metrics: Velocity (speed of the throw) is considered a more accurate measure of power than just distance.
- Key Considerations: The focus should be on explosive, high-speed movement.
Pneumatic resistance machines, such as the Keiser machine, are widely used to measure rotational power because they allow for the calculation of force and velocity throughout the entire range of motion.
3. Specialized Rotational Assessment Tools
- Keiser Twist Test: The athlete performs a seated or standing rotation (twist) against a specific resistance (e.g., 20 lbs).
- Metrics: Peak power (measured in Watts), velocity, and force are recorded instantly.
Advanced equipment can provide deeper, more detailed analytics of an athlete's rotational ability.
4. Key Metrics for Evaluation
- Proteus Motion: A device designed to measure 3D rotational power, providing comprehensive, objective data on an athlete’s strength and velocity.
- Blast Motion Sensors: Used frequently in baseball, these sensors are placed on a bat to measure rotational speed and acceleration.
- Force Plates: These can measure the ground force reaction (the "ground up" force) that contributes to rotational power.
Summary Table of Common Tests
- Power Output (Watts): The rate at which energy is produced during a rotation.
- Torque (Nm): The rotational equivalent of force, calculating the twisting force around an axis.
- Angular Velocity (rad/s): How fast the athlete is rotating.
- Separation/X-Factor: The degree of rotation between the hips and shoulders, which acts as an indicator of potential energy storage (the "rubber band" effect).
[th][td]Med Ball Throw[/td][td]Velocity/Distance[/td][td]All rotational sports (baseball, golf, tennis)[/td] [td]Keiser Twist Test[/td][td]Peak Power (Watts)[/td][td]Baseball, combat sports, rotational strength[/td] [td]Proteus Test[/td][td]3D Power/Velocity[/td][td]Comprehensive assessment[/td] [td]3D Motion Analysis[/td][td]Kinematic Sequence[/td][td]Golf, Baseball (analyzing mechanics)[/td]
Method
[/th][th]
Key Focus
[/th][th]
Best For
[/th]
When assessing, it is important to measure the athlete's ability to maintain high power output across multiple reps, not just a single, best attempt.
Not in modern rule sets no it isn’t.No one's arguing strength isn't important in martial arts this is the strength training section of a martial arts forum for God's sake. And for the record I'd argue conditioning is like neck and neck in terms of importance.
It’s tech intensive to throw a medicine ball hard against a wall and measure the velocity?That sounds very tech-intensive, which may explain why I never heard of it. I can contribute that the East German wrestling team came up with a number of specific machines designed to measure force in certain applications (e.g. the gut wrench machine, the suplex machine), but they never caught on. Much easier to see if you can turn or throw an opponent.