Movies IT Movie v.2 (Dragonlord's Review)

If you have seen IT (2017), how would you rate it?


  • Total voters
    160
SJW have not claimed "IT" as one of their own.. I'm seeing a ton of shit on Facebook etc that "Pennywise" the clown or "IT" is actually a female.. and women are celebrating about it all over the place.. Wow. Anyone that has read the books knows that "IT" is an alien creature that manipulate into whatever it wants.. In the books there are indeed mentions of egg sacs etc near the end.. But holy fuck...

It appears that women and transgenders are trying to make this film into some sort of movement lol..

"IT" is a demon, a demon is neither male or female just like angels or neither male or female.

SJW"s are idiots, because SJW's are idiots, and just like "IT" you can't tell whether most SJW"s are male or female.
 
Watched it. Loved it. 8/10

The kids were fantastic.
They were in the mini series as well, it was the adult part that fucked it up which is funny since they had a pretty decent cast.

Hopefully the sequel will get some good actors and actresses to play the adults and it will be much better than the mini series.
 
It's almost better to think of it as Stephen King as the more effective Freddy Kruger, rather than his characters. He's got a supernatural knack for pulling dread and terror out of banal circumstances, thus the effect is readers believing there is something just beyond their average, everyday field of vision.

For various reasons, though, the visual interpretations of his ideas are more miss than hit because visually it's nearly impossible to separate how silly some of it might look or seem. As we were ramping up for THE DARK TOWER, I wondered what they'd keep and what they'd jettison. For instance, I think people would buy a talking train, and a cybernetic giant bear, and a warlock, and order of cowboy knights, and teleportation, and the author writing himself into his own fiction -- but not all in the same story. It's a bit much to swallow. Visually-speaking.

But in the arena of the mind, Stephen King prevails.

21752719_1495894660446196_4182487377766003798_o.jpg

Can you imagine being part of the Dark Tower creative team right now? *smh*. Granted, DT is a much harder story to adapt but, Jesus Christ. How do you miss the mark so badly only to get shown up by literally a clown with a 35 million dollar budget?
 
Last edited:
SJW have not claimed "IT" as one of their own.. I'm seeing a ton of shit on Facebook etc that "Pennywise" the clown or "IT" is actually a female.. and women are celebrating about it all over the place.. Wow. Anyone that has read the books knows that "IT" is an alien creature that manipulate into whatever it wants.. In the books there are indeed mentions of egg sacs etc near the end.. But holy fuck...

It appears that women and transgenders are trying to make this film into some sort of movement lol..
{<doc}
 
5/10, it was average.

Pros:
Some of the visuals were really cool and I think improved on the 1990. I thought the arm reaching out of the gutter and pulling Georgie in was particularly chilling and a welcome take.
I liked this version of Pennywise. The Victorian costume was not an issue. I felt like the Clown was more appealing to children rather than Tim Curry who was just creepy all the time.
Clearly there were some little tidbits for those that have read the book: Turtlewax in the basement, the John Bunyan statue.
No "Love and Desire" scene.


Cons:
It feels rushed and dumbed down - too many cheap tricks and jump scares, not enough explanation of the characters intents or motives.
Over used CGI
Eddie K. was really annoying - I wished instead of his arm, he'd have broken his neck.
The Leper did not offer Eddie a blowjob
No mention of several very key characters - Will Hanlon, the "Other", Bobby Gray, etc.

Final thoughts:
Worth seeing, but I can't call it a faithful adaption. A lot of the spirit of the book is captured well, but events play themselves out very differently. Too much book to try to stuff into too little movie.
 
5/10

This is definitely one of those horror films that works better as a comedy than an horror. God bless that bespeckled kid, his jokes saved like half the movie. I do suppose this is a film that one would like a lot more as a kid though. There's also something to be said about a film that tells it's story earnestly, it just makes it more likable somehow.

But yeah... overall it's just baaaaad. :D It's attempts at appearing creepy or scary are just hilariously misfired.
 
Last edited:
I went back for a second viewing today. I really enjoyed it again. One thing I didn't notice the first time was the librarian creepily staring at Ben as he was flipping through the history of Derry books. That was so subtle, but if you notice it, extremely creepy.

I noticed it. They show her 2 or 3 times, but to no result. Much like the Joker statue in Exorcist 3.
 
4. TBH, I was more afraid during the battle scenes in Dunkirk with the bullets whizzing by and the explosions. Those actually make me duck for cover. lol Horror isn't my cup of tea, so take my vote with a grain of salt.
 
I always thought "It" was allegory for the molestation and underage sex that does sometimes happen.. I could get in deeper, but I think that's what "It" is actually referring to. I think the book is allegory for the haunting evil things that kids in a small town do when they are young that they might have to deal with when older.

I read the book as an older teenager. It's been a long time.
Go on...
 
This truly lived up to the hype. One of the best horror films I've seen in recent years. I adore the old mini-series, but this film was superior.

I honestly canNOT compare the series to this. Truly and honestly, i have no reason to ever, ever revisit it. Cant believe a poster or 2 dont obviously enjoy this one more, especially after reading Bob Grays posts.
 
I noticed it. They show her 2 or 3 times, but to no result. Much like the Joker statue in Exorcist 3.

Yep. Can't believe I missed it the first time. I love that it wasn't shoved in your face. Very nicely done IMO.
 
it was okay, it tried to hard to be funny at times. Typical horror remake, take a classic film, drench it in cuss word and special effects and pretend it's better for some reason.
 
it was okay, it tried to hard to be funny at times. Typical horror remake, take a classic film, drench it in cuss word and special effects and pretend it's better for some reason.

Uh, have you seen the first one? It is in no way, shape, or form a classic.
 

Well, the name, to begin with.. "IT." It's referring to "it." The thong you don't tall about. The clown is the universal representation of all things molesty. The luring kids, and then rehaunting them as adults. There's a lot more.
 
it was okay, it tried to hard to be funny at times. Typical horror remake, take a classic film, drench it in cuss word and special effects and pretend it's better for some reason.

The kids would have been funny of they were a little more believable. They weren't great. Movie was good, acting was 5/10.
 
Uh, have you seen the first one? It is in no way, shape, or form a classic.
it's a far cry from a technical masterpiece, but people still quote it and Tim Curry is arguably the most famous clown ever
 
The contrarians have entered the thread..
#youresocoolbrewster
 
Back
Top