International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

Choose the following that best describes your position


  • Total voters
    362
  • Poll closed .
If you want to call me out next time be proper and quote me

So you understand finally why someone would handle Iraq as a threat years later regardless right or wrong on the USA second war with them.

Either Iraq was seen as a credible threat and deserved to be invaded or America was lied to by Bush Cheney Netanyahu. You can't have it both ways.

Judging from your post, you're implying that America was right to see Iraq as a threat because of Kuwait.

"Regardless right or wrong"...no regardless. It was wrong. So wrong you should be second guessing any decision you make moving forward in regards to invading or bombing another country.

You really bore me though I'm done with you
 
They elected their own government for the first time in several decades, and when things were starting to backslide the US backed a military coup from the deep state.

What is even a Western-type government?
The kind where you have anything resembling free speech for starters. Do us a favor and go to any of these countries and tell them to fuck off. They actually truly love it and are just like you deep down. Same values and everything. I know because I saw one at Starbucks once and didn’t yell epithets at them.
 
I don't trust neither admins. You're trusting Netanyahu.

I don't see Iran as an ally. You see Israel as an ally.

I think neither should have nukes. You're okay with Israel having nukes.

Anything else?
Iran shouldn’t have nukes. And now they won’t. And thankfully we won’t have a global nuclear arms race that follows.
 

UN nuclear agency warns of possible contamination inside Iran’s Natanz site after Israeli strikes​


BY STEPHANIE LIECHTENSTEIN
Updated 11:02 AM BRT, June 16, 2025
Share
VIENNA (AP) — The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency said Monday that there is a possibility of both radiological and chemical contamination within Iran’s main nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz following Israeli strikes, although radiation levels outside the complex are presently normal.

The radiation poses a significant danger if uranium is inhaled or ingested, International Atomic Energy Agency Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi said.

The risk can be effectively managed with appropriate protective measures, such as using respiratory protection devices while inside the facilities, Grossi said.

“The level of radioactivity outside the Natanz site has remained unchanged and at normal levels, indicating no external radiological impact to the population or the environment from this event,” he said.

Grossi was addressing an urgent session of the IAEA’s board in Vienna that was convened at the request of Russia to discuss Israeli attacks against Iranian nuclear facilities. He said that there apparently was no additional damage at Natanz and the Isfahan nuclear research site since Saturday.

He said that the main concern inside the Natanz facility is the chemical toxicity of a gas called uranium hexafluoride, which is the result of fluorine mixed with the uranium during enrichment. It’s extremely volatile, will quickly corrode, can burn the skin and is especially deadly if inhaled, experts say.

Amid theses challenging and complex circumstances, it is crucial that the IAEA receives timely and regular technical information about the facilities and their respective sites,” Grossi said.

Without information, the U.N. agency “cannot accurately assess the radiological conditions and potential impacts on the population and the environment and cannot provide the necessary assistance.”

Grossi said that U.N. inspectors would remain present in Iran and inspect the nuclear facilities “as soon as safety conditions allow.”

He warned that “military escalation threatens lives, increases the chance of a radiological release with serious consequences for people and the environment and delays indispensable work towards a diplomatic solution for the long-term assurance that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon.”

Venezuela delivered a joint statement at the special board meeting on behalf of a group of states, among them Iran and Russia, condemning Israel’s attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, diplomats said on the condition of anonymity to discuss the closed-door meeting.

Satellite photos analyzed by The Associated Press show extensive damage at Iran’s main nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz. The images captured Saturday by Planet Labs PBC show multiple buildings damaged or destroyed. The structures hit include buildings identified by experts as supplying power to the facility.

Grossi told the U.N. Security Council on Friday that the above-ground section of the Natanz facility was destroyed. The main centrifuge facility underground didn’t appear to be hit, but the loss of power could have damaged infrastructure there, he said.

Israel also struck a nuclear research facility in Isfahan. The IAEA said that four critical buildings were damaged, including a uranium-conversion facility, but there was no sign of increased radiation at Natanz or Isfahan.

Grossi also told the IAEA board of governors on Monday that no damage has been seen at the site of the Fordo enrichment site, which is buried under a mountain and protected by anti-aircraft batteries. Fordo appears designed to withstand airstrikes.

Grossi also said that the Bushehr nuclear power plant, Iran’s only commercial nuclear power plant, hasn’t been targeted or affected by the recent attacks, and neither has the Tehran Research Reactor.

Any country on the 35-member board of the IAEA can call a meeting under its rules. Last week, the IAEA board found Iran to be in noncompliance with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years.

https://apnews.com/article/iran-nuclear-israel-radiation-natanz-a58c0e06ad30b3a8bf21159a4f54c35a
 
I've been watching almost every news report I can find since the war began, and I've been watching the videos of missiles hitting Israel. There is very little footage of anything happening in Iran due to the internet outage. Starlink is active in some small areas I've heard.

Tel Aviv has taken a lot of damage, so it's going to be interesting to see what happens next. Many missiles have penetrated the Iron Dome and hit Tel Aviv. How long can Iran sustain the missile attacks, and what happens when they can't. It appears the US may enter the war soon as well.
The whole thing is giving pre-Iraq war vibes.

 
Iran had 30+ years to make a bomb with some of their best scientists and academics who've been to accredited universities worldwide and apparently still hasn't done it but is very close...

Meanwhile North Korea did it while suffering one of the worst famines, and under some of the most extreme international isolation of any other recognized nation.

Make it make sense lol

Because Asians are good at math?
 
Should Israel sign onto the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?

It’s less interesting to me than preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons. Israel isn’t the only nuclear nation not signed.
 
Either Iraq was seen as a credible threat and deserved to be invaded or America was lied to by Bush Cheney Netanyahu. You can't have it both ways.

Judging from your post, you're implying that America was right to see Iraq as a threat because of Kuwait.

"Regardless right or wrong"...no regardless. It was wrong. So wrong you should be second guessing any decision you make moving forward in regards to invading or bombing another country.

You really bore me though I'm done with you
Iraq was a threat. I don't agree with justification for second time. But hint... i said second time. Iran is a threat. Do you disagree? What would it take from the brainwashed brain you have to say otherwise?
 
So in two shorts weeks we went from * Israel is going to handle this* to having a full fledged operation by the United States government. I think we got scammed here
 
Iraq was a threat. I don't agree with justification for second time. But hint... i said second time. Iran is a threat. Do you disagree? What would it take from the brainwashed brain you have to say otherwise?

If iraq was a threat why did Bush and gang need to lie to invade? If they're a threat, by definition that should be enough to neutralize them.

If we are going by your logic, every country can be a threat to various degrees. Iran is a threat. Israel is a threat. Nk, china, india, Pakistan.

Just admit you have no idea what you're talking about and you drank the iraq WMD koolaid. Wouldnt be surprised if you or your buttbuddy served in that atrocious invasion.
 
If iraq was a threat why did Bush and gang need to lie to invade? If they're a threat, by definition that should be enough to neutralize them.

If we are going by your logic, every country can be a threat to various degrees. Iran is a threat. Israel is a threat. Nk, china, india, Pakistan.

Just admit you have no idea what you're talking about and you drank the iraq WMD koolaid. Wouldnt be surprised if you or your buttbuddy served in that atrocious invasion.
Did Iraq invade a country first? Yes or no.
 
If iraq was a threat why did Bush and gang need to lie to invade? If they're a threat, by definition that should be enough to neutralize them.

If we are going by your logic, every country can be a threat to various degrees. Iran is a threat. Israel is a threat. Nk, china, india, Pakistan.

Just admit you have no idea what you're talking about and you drank the iraq WMD koolaid. Wouldnt be surprised if you or your buttbuddy served in that atrocious invasion.
I already see you are unhinged bro. Lol 😂
 
Did Iraq invade a country first? Yes or no.

And that's your rationale for why Iraq got invaded by Bush and Gang.

How many countries has America invaded? By your logic countries can see America as a threat and should invade them because Iraq also invaded Kuwait that one time.

You're out of your depth. Are you a boomer? It would make a lot of sense.
 
And that's your rationale for why Iraq got invaded by Bush and Gang.

How many countries has America invaded? By your logic countries can see America as a threat and should invade them because Iraq also invaded Kuwait that one time.

You're out of your depth. Are you a boomer? It would make a lot of sense.
It's escalation friend. It's not hard logic to understand why regardless if you agree or not.
 
And that's your rationale for why Iraq got invaded by Bush and Gang.

How many countries has America invaded? By your logic countries can see America as a threat and should invade them because Iraq also invaded Kuwait that one time.

You're out of your depth. Are you a boomer? It would make a lot of sense.
Lol I'm a boomer? Naw. I just like calling out soft people like you
 
Back
Top