- Joined
- May 6, 2007
- Messages
- 6,867
- Reaction score
- 8,986
There also I depends with what level opponent one is matched.
-
For example, I compared fight where a guy with 6-0-0 pro record and If I'm correct, 145-5 ammy record had been matched with someone that had approx 15 ammy bouts and pro record 1-5-0.
For this more experienced guy it was easier than daily training session in gym. Relax mode.
Ofc, get any impressive ranking with rise with this fight he wasn't able, but to get pro record till 7-0-0 with this fight, yah, yes.
Boring to watch, 90/10 matchup if not more.
-
Another example, when debut guy with approx 20 ammy bouts and 5 exibition fights had been matched with a guy that had 3-2-0 pro record and approx 60 ammy bouts.
& There yeah, he get impressive for debut guy ranking points from debut fight but…. a bit too risky, guy really was exausted, yup, he had won in real all 3 last rounds , expect 1st round on cards, yeah, was better.
There yes, at least also to buy tickets for fans was worth it, but too risky.
-
Or if one is able to be good counter striker and is hard& precise hitting lad...
Relatively not much tired after fight guy when he beated out all shit from previously undefeadted guy, don't remember he had 5 or 6 wins before this.
He literally initially a bit counter punched with creating just small openings, then increased output in 2 nd round, pressed guy, after 3 rd round guy - opponent wasn't able to continue for 4 th round, too damaged, also already get 2 counts too.
Funny, possible undefeated prospect beated up by nobody with 1-0-0 record.
----------
I btw might post some KB/ boxing guys running results for 3000 meters and compare these with light athletics tournament for sport school ( light athletics specialised programme ) guy.
I'm definitely not saying running is "tougher" than combat sports lol. But if your sole focus is pushing your cardio system, in sports like running, rowing or cross country skiing, you can continuously keep yourself at lactate threshold vs. only intermittently spiking above it in combat sports.
Yeah, there former foresters and hunters are suitable : this at least was in WW1, WW2 times, they knew how to hide properly in forest etc to hunt animals, so were suitable to hide from people too ( observation etc ). In WW2 had to fight not only large army units but a lot of partisan units and recon/ diversion units too …. I this about WW2 in Europe.
This for example and plenty of stuff like this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistance_during_World_War_II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_partisans
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Žižka_partisan_brigade
Plus organised recoinscance / diversion units, usually dropped from airplanes in nazi occupied territories.
As a guy who served, I have zero problems acknowledging that the militaries on all sides had it WAY harder in WW II and earlier. But that's true in every walk of life, not just the military - there's different kinds of headaches now but as far as physical hardship, the average guy in the 40's was a tough bastard. Now the average guy drinks soy milk and complains when his internet goes out.