the Machida one should not count.
Sure it should. It was a very close fight that could have went either way.
the Machida one should not count.
Wanderlei? really? Rumble destroy any version of Wanderlei inside 1 round
Wanderlei? really? Rumble destroy any version of Wanderlei inside 1 round
I don't think so sir.
![]()
Well tge think is DC is both better & greater than Wanderlei, so not sure what the guy you quoted is trying to get across, hahaha.
Good thread @JustOnce, it's something I've thought about a lot as well. I know a lot of people are taking issue with you putting DC at number two, and who should go where in the rest of the top. I think in theory I agree with DC being #2, but I'm open to having my mind changed on who should be there.
On the premise of the thread though, yeah I think you can really make that case. He might be the biggest power puncher of all time, certainly in the conversation. The biggest issue with Rumble was his mental lapses in fights, and in my opinion he's something of a frontrunner.
I really like his chances against a lot of the other all-timers, especially the ones who would have been willing to trade with him (I'm looking at you, Chuck, Wanderlei, Shogun). It would be interesting to see how his wrestling would hold up against people like Randy, Rashad, Hendo, Tito in his day. Obviously he did well against Bader and Davis, but those guys all bring something a little different to the table.
Rampage and Machida I think are tough matchups for him as well. Vitor obviously beat him, and since Rumble missed weight by so much he was technically LHW himself in that fight.
TLDR; I think the argument is a legitimate one to make in theory. I don't think it's a fair argument to make in practice, just because of the lack of a title and relatively short LHW career. I think Rumble's place in our collective memory should be as a fighter who cut too much weight early in his career, figured it out eventually, and established himself as perhaps the premiere power puncher of in the organization's history. That is a hell of an accolade to claim.
I'd give him a great shot against a lot of these guys, but the way he lost at Lightweight (Clementi), Welterweight (Koscheck) were not entirely different from how DC beat him at Light Heavyweight. It's fair to say giving up his back, was a consistent weakness he had, and I think a counterpoint here is that a lot of these other ATGs have solid grappling and the skill/tenacity to hang around in fights where he might eventually crack.
Rampage had a good ground game in his prime. A lot of people only watched him in the ufc where he was primarily a striker.I think Rumble's a better version of Rampage.
Yeah, the hardest part is deciding which era of Rampage we're talking about here. Are we talking about the Pride era Rampage that mixed things up more often, or are we talking about the boxing focused Rampage from later in his UFC career?Rampage had a good ground game in his prime. A lot of people only watched him in the ufc where he was primarily a striker.
Rampage had a good ground game in his prime. A lot of people only watched him in the ufc where he was primarily a striker.
Oh come on Page was shot by the bader fightRumble's a better wrestler at LHW. Much better credentials, and Rumble was incomparably better against a common opponent in Bader who's a great MMA wrestler.
People forget Rumble was a young guy at 28 when he fought Vitor. He went 13-2 after losing only to Rampage.
Hardly fair comparing Rumble who's in his 20's with 25 fights deep into his career as a fresh recent former title challenger compared to a guy who's already highly decorated in his mid 30's with 42 fights deep into his career.Rumble's a better wrestler at LHW. Much better credentials, and Rumble was incomparably better against a common opponent in Bader who's a great MMA wrestler.
the Machida one should not count.
You mean DC, correct?Rumble's a better wrestler at LHW. Much better credentials, and Rumble was incomparably better against a common opponent in Bader who's a great MMA wrestler.
People forget Rumble was a young guy at 28 when he fought Vitor. He went 13-2 after losing only to Rampage.
Damn, Clementi actually choked him out cold (I don't think that's what was on the record). you can clearly hear Herb talking to him about waking up.
I don't necessarily think it's a "fair" fight to judge a fighter on, because the context they provided during the fight was that rumble came in on short notice, struggled with the weight cut and gassed pretty bad. His cardio was much better vs koscheck, for example. Yet the results were the same. Rich survived a few big shots. He hung in there, and then eventually Rumble scored a takedown but was so pooped he lost the position, was taken down himself, and easily gave up his back as he did in his other losses.
I think it's reasonable to suggest that Rumble's power at welterweight, while absolutely huge, did not translate quite as effectively in that division as it did in his bulked up 205 division. I also think it is a testament to just how good that 170 lbs division was at that time.
In hindsight, I'm not sure why he didn't go to middleweight instead/stay there when he got there. He could have been an all time great there, as well.