This period wasn't weak CW era period. The same Usyk had prime shape undefeated in pro boxing opponents.No, I don't rank usyk anywhere near the top 10 ATG. Not even top 10 all-time HW. But I would rank him top 5 all-time among cruiserweights ahead of juan carlos gomez.
I seen where paulie malignaggi had a YT post implying that usyk and ali are in the same league. And some other YT content creators are kinda hinting or just plain coming out and making the assertion that usyk is better than ali and that usyk is the greatest HW of all time and shit like that....reminds me of when ggg was campaigning and people would say he was better than hagler, joe louis and ali. HBO even once said ggg was the greatest MW of the past 25 years.
IMO if they compare usyk to ali, they smokin' the crack of butt.
Don't get me wrong. Usyk is probably a great fighter. but i don't think you can say exactly HOW great he is based on his accomplishments at CW and HW. The CW division has been weak since its inception. Standouts like holyfield, haye, toney, etc, didn't stick around long to bring any real visibility to that division. they all moved up to HW and they all won at least a version of the HW title. and it's not like usyk was a dominant CW champion. he struggled with breidis and bellew neither of whom is a HoFer. At HW, the comp was fury, AJ and dubois. All second-raters as far as i'm concerned. And i still think dubois deserved the KO win in the first fight.
Definitely Briedis isn't HoFer and I think he doesn't care about HoF at all. What stuff you had expected? Usyk finishing Briedis in distance? No one ever had did this, nor in KB nor boxing...
Yes, Usyk barely had win vs Briedis and if it wasn't 12 rounder but 15 ...maybe might lost. However Briedis was a bit worse than Holyfield then. .a bit.
Plus Holy was better am boxer than Briedis, Briedis more was KBer....
Not to count in later later lazy versions...ofc.