- Joined
- Mar 7, 2015
- Messages
- 12,871
- Reaction score
- 13,096
Looking at their resumés, I'm honestly not sure who was better in their division.
They are both Top 3-5 All-Time in their respective divisions. My knee-jeek reaction was that Max is better, but then when I think about Charles's insane win streak to the top, mixed with the finish records, the title reign, finishing Dustin, Justin, Chandler, Dariush, Gamrot etc. idk, I think it's a lot closer than people might imagine.
But then again, Max did stop Jose Aldo twice, granted, Jose had already lost to Conor at that point, but still. Max also has the win over a pre-prime Charles similar to how Conor has the win over a pre-prime Max.
It's a toss-up in my opinion, but would like to hear people arguments one way or the other.
They are both Top 3-5 All-Time in their respective divisions. My knee-jeek reaction was that Max is better, but then when I think about Charles's insane win streak to the top, mixed with the finish records, the title reign, finishing Dustin, Justin, Chandler, Dariush, Gamrot etc. idk, I think it's a lot closer than people might imagine.
But then again, Max did stop Jose Aldo twice, granted, Jose had already lost to Conor at that point, but still. Max also has the win over a pre-prime Charles similar to how Conor has the win over a pre-prime Max.
It's a toss-up in my opinion, but would like to hear people arguments one way or the other.
Last edited: