Opinion Is Jimmy Dore right wing now?

He is a completely shameless fucking whore who switched to far-right conspiratardism because that is where the real money is. In 2016 Dore literally spit in Alex Jones' face when he saw him. By the time Dore was on Rogan's podcast recently, he and Joe were jerking each other off, literally saying "It's amazing how right he [Alex Jones] is."

How does one go from spitting on Alex Jones to lionizing him? Alex is the same piece of shit he's been for the last 25 years. Worse, if anything, because of all the shit that came out during the Sandy Hook trial.

Dore's channel is almost entirely Putin propaganda now. Dore accuses everyone of being a warmonger...except Vladimir Putin!!
So who was he whoring for in that video i posted from yesterday where he is praising co op work enviornments and socialist policy?
Who was he whoring for when he was trying to force a vote for M4A?
Who was he whoring for when he had the leader of the rail road union on?

How does someone go from spitting in someones face to loving them? Maybe ask the democratic party, who hated Bush jr and now is hugging all over him. Or maybe Kamala who called Biden a racist in the primaries but now pretends theyre best buddies.

Or maybe the fact that Alex Jones and the conspiracy theorist circles got a few right and Jimmy saw that and did some thinking of his own and landed more on their side because hes naturally anti establishment.

All of that is more coherent than assuming hes whoring for.... who again?
 
Holding a vote for an unpopular policy that won't pass is a political loser for reasons that should be obvious. You stick your neck out if it can get good results (as Dems did with the ACA, for example--there was an initial political price but it was worth it to pass great policy, and it's now popular). Not just for no reason. Pelosi doesn't want to lose seats because she actually cares about expanding access to care. Why would Republicans be hurt if Dems are hurt politically?
They ran on m4a. So to be totally clear you think they lied and that’s totally fine. holding a vote for what you ran on is far right now
 
So who was he whoring for in that video i posted from yesterday where he is praising co op work enviornments and socialist policy?
Who was he whoring for when he was trying to force a vote for M4A?
Who was he whoring for when he had the leader of the rail road union on?
Yeah, paying some lip service to a co op work environment doesn't erase all the work he does accusing Zelensky of being a NATO puppet and insisting Putin is really the good guy.
How does someone go from spitting in someones face to loving them? Maybe ask the democratic party, who hated Bush jr and now is hugging all over him. Or maybe Kamala who called Biden a racist in the primaries but now pretends theyre best buddies.
She never called him racist. She criticized some of his past work regarding race relations and specifically prefaced it by saying "I do not think you are a racist." This is light years apart from fucking spitting in someone's face then licking their ass.
Or maybe the fact that Alex Jones and the conspiracy theorist circles got a few right and Jimmy saw that and did some thinking of his own and landed more on their side because hes naturally anti establishment.

All of that is more coherent than assuming hes whoring for.... who again?
Yeah, when Alex Jones got sued for $1.5 billion because he harassed the family members of children who were massacred, Jimmy Dore must have had an epiphany. "Hey this guy's actually alright!" Very coherent.
 
Dore gargled the balls of some other pieces of shit on Rogan's podcast too. Dore claimed Obama and Clinton assassinated Gaddafi because he was going to start a new currency of Africa (based on the gold standard) that would compete with the Euro and U.S. dollar, so they had to kill him.

This was during the same segment he claimed only just recently the mainstream news finally admitted Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11. Odd, because, for example, The Looming Tower was published in 2006, was a huge best seller, won a Pulitzer Prize in 2007. It was all about the Saudi involvement.

You've got to be a real top mind to not realize Dore is full of shit.
 
so you did some false equivalency and we are supposed to eat it up and agree?
It's a real equivalence, and the point was to try to help you understand the argument. But you appear to have some kind of learning disability.
This is a very very large part of the problem for democrats. The ostracizing of people of principal. Running off Obama voters until they vote for Trump and then blaming said voter when in fact the party is utterly broken and corrupt.
I think any reasonable person will have a problem dealing with raging hacks like you and Dore. But I think most Americans can see through that kind of thing, which is why Dore's fanbase is just unthinking GOP supporters.
 
You get one vote . How else do you tell either the Republicans or the democrats I'm not buying what you are selling and I'd like you to tweak your positions if you would like to continue to count on my support ?
My dude, we live in a democracy with over 300 million people. If you're so narcissistic that you think that a candidate has to agree with you about everything to get your vote, just don't participate.
 
My dude, we live in a democracy with over 300 million people. If you're so narcissistic that you think that a candidate has to agree with you about everything to get your vote, just don't participate.

We live in a democracy so vote your team no matter what til you die or don't participate !
 
Democrats sucking Pharma's dick for donations is them abandoning everything they were supposed to stand for.

Pharma keeps both sides well paid, Congress allows them to keep advertising on TV.

We've gone from 4-5 childhood vaccines to almost 70 because Congress granted them immunity from any damage their products may cause. Ask yourselves... Are kids healthier today than we were in the 70's/80's & 90's? lol... C'mon

And nows there's a country full of people taking 5 to 6 different prescriptions at any time...

Do you think it's possible that there are more childhood vaccines available today than in the past because more vaccines have been developed?
 
We live in a democracy so vote your team no matter what til you die or don't participate !
What is it with you nutters and reading comprehension? I think probably to some extent it's just low character, but I'll explain. If you want more rigid hierarchy in society, vote for Republicans. You have the right, certainly. If you want a more equal society, vote for Democrats. Again, you have the right. If you demand that every platform has to be specifically tailored just for you, you're not a good fit for a democratic society. That's just the way it is. Democracy requires compromise.
 
Last edited:
What is it with you nutters and reading comprehension? I think probably to some extent it's just low character, but I'll explain. If you want more rigid hierarchy in society, vote for Republicans. You have the right, certainly. If you want a more equal society, for for Democrats. Again, you have the right. If you demand that every platform has to be specifically tailored just for you, you're not a good fit for a democratic society. That's just the way it is. Democracy requires compromise.


You know it's funny that you would lecture me about reading comprehension when you are trying to snag me up in both of these responses on things that I didn't actually say.

There is a huge difference between a candidate has to agree with someone 100 percent and the party is getting too far away from what they believe to continue to support them at this time.
 
Jon Stewart must be right wing now for calling Democrats hypocrites at the DNC.


They had people who prosecuted sexual predators, and then they had Bill Clinton give a speech,” Stewart remarked, highlighting the inconsistency in the party’s messaging.

They had a guy yelling ‘screw the billionaires’ followed immediately by a very happy billionaire,” Stewart quipped, referencing the stark contrast between Sanders’ populist message and Pritzker’s presence at the convention.

“They had guys making fun of people going to Yale in front of a bunch of people who went to Yale,” he said, underlining the contradiction between the party’s anti-elitist rhetoric and the reality of its members’ backgrounds.

Democrats believe anyone critical of them is far right.
 
You know it's funny that you would lecture me about reading comprehension when you are trying to snag me up in both of these responses on things that I didn't actually say.
What are you talking about? I didn't try to snag you up on anything you didn't say. I just said that if you expect a platform to be custom-tailored to you, you're too narcissistic to be a functioning member of a democratic society.
There is a huge difference between a candidate has to agree with someone 100 percent and the party is getting too far away from what they believe to continue to support them at this time.
OK, but there are two candidates on the ballot with a chance to win. I also find that people (yourself definitely not excluded) who make those kinds of statements usually have a false understanding of what parties support, which kind of give away the game (e.g., "I believe Democrats support the things Republicans say they support rather than their actual platform or legislation").
 
Jon Stewart must be right wing now for calling Democrats hypocrites at the DNC.


They had people who prosecuted sexual predators, and then they had Bill Clinton give a speech,” Stewart remarked, highlighting the inconsistency in the party’s messaging.

They had a guy yelling ‘screw the billionaires’ followed immediately by a very happy billionaire,” Stewart quipped, referencing the stark contrast between Sanders’ populist message and Pritzker’s presence at the convention.

“They had guys making fun of people going to Yale in front of a bunch of people who went to Yale,” he said, underlining the contradiction between the party’s anti-elitist rhetoric and the reality of its members’ backgrounds.

Democrats believe anyone critical of them is far right.
Interesting contrast because in fact, no one (I mean, you can find randos on Twitter who believe anything, but no one serious) thinks that Stewart is "far right" or a fraud like Dore. To Republicans who like Dore, what do you think the difference is?

More generally, lots of left-leaning pundits regularly criticize the left or Democrats specifically and retain large followings of left-leaning people. How does that fit with the theory of Dore defenders?
 
Your post said he was “always” one of the worst people on the right, and a lot of people agreed with that. If by “always” you mean as far as he has been on the right…well I don’t even agree with that because the right truly has some retarded people, but it makes more sense.

But the obvious interpretation for me is that he has always been on the right which isn’t true.
He was on TYT which is obviously left leaning so there's denying he was a leftist but I don't think he ever moved the needle much on his own until he found his niche as a staunch critic of the Democrats from the left which ultimately lead him to cozying up with right wing populists.
 
You get one vote . How else do you tell either the Republicans or the democrats I'm not buying what you are selling and I'd like you to tweak your positions if you would like to continue to count on my support ?
You could just...tell them? We have freedom of speech for precisely that purpose.
 
What are you talking about? I didn't try to snag you up on anything you didn't say. I just said that if you expect a platform to be custom-tailored to you, you're too narcissistic to be a functioning member of a democratic society.

OK, but there are two candidates on the ballot with a chance to win. I also find that people (yourself definitely not excluded) who make those kinds of statements usually have a false understanding of what parties support, which kind of give away the game (e.g., "I believe Democrats support the things Republicans say they support rather than their actual platform or legislation").


Yes why are you even talking about people thinking that party politics should be custom tailored to them ? That's isn't anywhere close to what I said.

And don't be a condescending asshole its tiring . I know what the parties actually believe in.
 
He was on TYT which is obviously left leaning so there's denying he was a leftist but I don't think he ever moved the needle much on his own until he found his niche as a staunch critic of the Democrats from the left which ultimately lead him to cozying up with right wing populists.
Off by one degree here. He goes where he’s invited. CNN et al don’t invite him. He goes on tucker and gives his stance which is the same as it was at tyt.
 
I've been pretty vocal about it and it seems they don't care.
I can tell you that voting for Trump certainly won't help reform the Dems. If you want to vote for Trump because you like Trump that's a different story, that would actually make sense.
 
Back
Top