Crime Is Flynn Cohen to Prison? (SCO Thread v. 26)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Still waiting for another source to corroborate, but right now Trump’s only badmouthing Cohen, not denying the accusation, which is concerning. This could still blow in the faces of people who badly want it to be true, but for Trump’s supporters, doesn’t this justify ending his presidency if true?
 
Still waiting for another source to corroborate, but right now Trump’s only badmouthing Cohen, not denying the accusation, which is concerning. This could still blow in the faces of people who badly want it to be true, but for Trump’s supporters, doesn’t this justify ending his presidency if true?

Even the WH spokesperson didn't deny it.
 
Just remember that dems have already set the bar that lying is not grounds for removal from office. Nor should be ‘directing to lie’
 
Even the WH spokesperson didn't deny it.

On the other hand, the times and the post aren’t reporting it as fact either. I’d say the appropriate response is that popcorn gif, if only because it’ll be fun watching one side gloat regardless of the outcome:
 
I do. DJT was never fit for the office, and Pence will at least be dignified. He can carry the agenda forward without being a laughingstock.
Donny Moscow is a total disgrace, that I can tell you.

I mean, I'm starting to entertain the possibility that he may have shaded the truth just a wee bit.
well even if impeached Pence is next in line.

But if Trump is impeached and found criminally liable for colluding with Russians to steal the election the Dems could make an interesting Constitutional challenge asserting that by stealing the election illegally everything Trump did was actually invalid. His supreme court nominations, etc, and that argument holds merit. Should Trump or his party or followers benefit from an illegal action?

it would be a shit show of a giant Constitutional question but I think if Trump gets the book thrown at him and he is convicted the Dems would pursue that.
 
Just remember that dems have already set the bar that lying is not grounds for removal from office. Nor should be ‘directing to lie’

200w.webp
 


Trump’s new defense. I can protect you from the scary people.

I bet you any amount of money those “prayer rugs”are nothing more than blankets that were left by migrants as they were moving through the area.
 
Last edited:
well even if impeached Pence is next in line.

But if Trump is impeached and found criminally liable for colluding with Russians to steal the election the Dems could make an interesting Constitutional challenge asserting that by stealing the election illegally everything Trump did was actually invalid. His supreme court nominations, etc, and that argument holds merit. Should Trump or his party or followers benefit from an illegal action?

it would be a shit show of a giant Constitutional question but I think if Trump gets the book thrown at him and he is convicted the Dems would pursue that.
Bricks will be shat.
<{hughesimpress}>
 
Yeah, I'm thinking more along those lines. She's probably feeding him inside stuff too.

It’s actually neither of the two. Washington is all about a façade of sides. No one really takes any of this seriously Republican or Democrat about attacking one another. At the end of the day it’s all politics and they all realize this so what Conway is doing is his job and what Kellyann is doing is her job and that’s all.
 
It’s actually neither of the two. Washington is all about a façade of sides. No one really takes any of this seriously Republican or Democrat about attacking one another. At the end of the day it’s all politics and they all realize this so what Conway is doing is his job and what Kellyann is doing is her job and that’s all.
IDK man, she is really destroying her reputation as a credible person. Let me correct that, her reputation is destroyed.

And I also think people do have strongly held political views. But hey man maybe you're right and it's a show. I really don't know what's in their heads.
 
<Lmaoo>
Buzzfeed...


That's why the report says "two investigators claim...", nimrod. He doesn't need to see the evidence if he reports the information he actually has.

He didn't report "Trump directed Cohen to lie to Congress". Because he didn't personally see the evidence corroborating said claim. So he reports the claim and not the validity of it. Learn to read.

What is it you're fishing for, anyway? Did the reporter lie about what investigators told him or did the investigators for some reason decide to troll the media? I'm guessing you have no clue.
 
Just remember that dems have already set the bar that lying is not grounds for removal from office. Nor should be ‘directing to lie’

Just remember there was no counterintelligence investigation opened up regarding Clinton boinking Lewinsky. Lewinsky's vagina was not a threat to national security.<{Heymansnicker}>
 
That's why the report says "two investigators claim...", nimrod. He doesn't need to see the evidence if he reports the information he actually has.

He didn't report "Trump directed Cohen to lie to Congress". Because he didn't personally see the evidence corroborating said claim. So he reports the claim and not the validity of it. Learn to read.

What is it you're fishing for, anyway? Did the reporter lie about what investigators told him or did the investigators for some reason decide to troll the media? I'm guessing you have no clue.
LOL at fishing. Irony not your strong point, huh, Goober?
This is the shit you drooling sweathogs so desperately cling to, fake bullshit by non-journalists working for a website geared towards teenage girls.
You people are a sad sad joke.
 
So we now have full blown proof of collusion (more accurately conspiracy to commit fraud) via Manafort, Gates, Paige, and Flynn with GRU agents.

We also have proof of obstruction of justice via suboerning perjury with Cohen being directed by Trump to lie about Trump's business deal in Moscow.

Conservatives of sherdog...................... where do you draw the line?

Are you American first and Republican second?

Or do you believe that protecting corruption is more important than protecting our nation?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top