joy2day
Brown Belt
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2024
- Messages
- 3,413
- Reaction score
- 7,141
In a nutshell, they are both great in their own way, but BJ wasn't always motivated.BJ’s didn’t really adhere to the common sense of weight classes, thus half of his losses were fighting up at up at WW. Regardless of being undersized BJ would go to the death. He only lost once by submission, add that a majority of his KO loses were past his best. That being said… BJ Penn’s kryptonite was his inconsistencies in his conditioning, also he often changed trainers between fights. BJ goes to the death unless his opponent is an axle grease loaded French-Canucks or a Bantamweight.
Charles always knows when to live to fight another day, hence why he has 4 submission L’s on his resume, Charles is kill or be killed fighter, best whenever he’s the hammer, as the nail he would give up on himself….
Comparing them is like differentiating between the hamburgler and grimace.
This might merit two different comparisons:
1) Chuck vs Penn
2) Chuck vs Motivated Penn