Shows just how important the writers and directors are. Hire the ones who understand the job.
I think thats the massive mistake Disney made, seems like they really bought into the whole culture around the prequel takedowns that the problem was directors taking franchises too seriously, that you needed someone who would stick to a cheap formula.
Honestly I felt OWK was "ok" but mostly because it obviously stuck quite closely to the production style of stuff like Rogue One, Mando, etc which I'm guessing is pretty "in house" now post sequels? rather uneven but the fact it mostly looked and sounded the part plus had McGregor was enough to make it worth watching. Definately not on the same level as Rogue One, Mando or Andor though, the SW of the Disney era that its really worth seeking out more the same kind of level of the Solo film, passable but lacking in real inspiration and rather uneven.
I do tend to wonder whether part of the issue is execs like Kennedy are actually more afraid of directors/writers who are a bit more ambitious and actually fans of the franchise. You hire a hack to do a job and they do what you say, you hire someone with more ambition to do it and there more likelty to do what they want and perhaps more importantly become entrenched in the franchise costing you power as it looks like Feloni and Favreau have with SW.
I think this could maybe explain why franchises like Terminator have been as bad as they have for so long, you end up with execs in a position were they control the franchise, it becomes their meal ticket and they don't want some ambitious director coming in and potentially taking over.
Often it seems like with these really big franchises like SW and the DCEU you have to wait for them to fail before you actually get good stuff being made, you have to wait for the execs to lose some power before anyone with ambition/skill is allowed near a franchise.