IG Report to blast FBI

[SBJJ]

Thoughts on the alleged crimes of Trump and the Trump foundation? Figured you be all over that as a moderate who hates corruption of all kinds. Weird you're not in the thread at all...

What is there to say? Like u said, it’s alleged. And from what I’m hearing it’s the IRS that should handle this type of thing

Are u familiar with this AG? Has she said some outrageous stuff in the past?

Are u aware of what kind of case it even is? Trump end up in jail u think?

If it’s proven wrongdoing occurred here I’m all for whoever facilitated the wrongdoing being punished

 

[bobgeese]

Solid response.

"The report will likely revive scrutiny of the FBI’s handling of the Clinton case and the extent to which it helped shape the outcome of the presidential election. Its conclusions may cut against President Donald Trump’s repeated assertions that the FBI was working against him during the campaign and instead revive allegations that the bureau broke from protocol in ways that ultimately harmed Clinton."

Let’s be clear, Hillary hurt Hillary.

 

[PolishHeadlock]

Are any Liberals currently taking W's? Serious question.

Dems have been doing well in special elections since the 2016 Election along with State legislatures.

I don't think Corey Stewart winning the GOP primary for Senator in VA is going to bode well for them. The Dems currently have the seat with Tim Kaine as the incumbent but having Stewart paraded around as a US Senate Candidate is a bad look

 

[SBJJ]

Solid response.

"The report will likely revive scrutiny of the FBI’s handling of the Clinton case and the extent to which it helped shape the outcome of the presidential election. Its conclusions may cut against President Donald Trump’s repeated assertions that the FBI was working against him during the campaign and instead revive allegations that the bureau broke from protocol in ways that ultimately harmed Clinton."

What does the way they handled Clinton prove they did nothing wrong with Trump?

Are u aware even much of the MSM is disagreeing with u on this

 

[PolishHeadlock]

Lol. Was no big deal but you have it all in your mind.

Anyway. Our other bet is the real one. Just feel lucky u didn’t go the Ban route on this one.

How’s it feel to be a mark

Yeah there's a reason I did a month sig bet on this one and the account bet on NK denuclearizing lol

And lol at being enamored with being able to remember that we had a month long av bet.

 

[Cojopi Extomino]

What is there to say? Like u said, it’s alleged. And from what I’m hearing it’s the IRS that should handle this type of thing

You can't even tell me what was alleged, can you?

What is there to say? A lot. There's a lot to say about the president instructing his foundation to do something illegal, and there being proof in handwriting. Unless of course you're a complete hack avoiding the thread because you're afraid to address it.

Are u familiar with this AG? Has she said some outrageous stuff in the past?

If she said "unicorn milk makes great tits", tell me what that has to do with what's being alleged? You can't, because the answer is "nothing".

Are u aware of what kind of case it even is? Trump end up in jail u think?

Probably not. Do you think it's ok for the president to commit crimes as long as they don't result in jail time?

If it’s proven wrongdoing occurred here I’m all for whoever facilitated the wrongdoing being punished

Well then you might wanna head over to the thread....



Why do you even bother pretending to be impartial when you post the way you do? Who do you think believes it? Honest question.

 

[HomerThompson]

Are any Liberals currently taking W's? Serious question.

Me, for one.

 

[SBJJ]

Yeah there's a reason I did a month sig bet on this one and the account bet on NK denuclearizing lol

And lol at being enamored with being able to remember that we had a month long av bet.

U sure it wasn’t 3 months. Lol

Anyway. How bout double or nothing mark. You have any other Strong Conspiracy Theories

 

[SBJJ]

You can't even tell me what was alleged, can you?

What is there to say? A lot. There's a lot to say about the president instructing his foundation to do something illegal, and there being proof in handwriting. Unless of course you're a complete hack avoiding the thread because you're afraid to address it.



If she said "unicorn milk makes great tits", tell me what that has to do with what's being alleged? You can't, because the answer is "nothing".



Probably not. Do you think it's ok for the president to commit crimes as long as they don't result in jail time?



Well then you might wanna head over to the thread....



Why do you even bother pretending to be impartial when you post the way you do? Who do you think believes it? Honest question.

I’m not impartial because I won’t say people are guilty before a trial? Lol. YOU said this is alleged

If they have the goods that wrongdoings/Crimes occurred than the proper punishment should be applied

You really wanna keep spazzing on my impartiality? Would you like a side by side of you and I on the issues? Can you point to anything impartial on your part. I can find plenty of posts of me bashing Trump and his administration

I’m on record supporting impeachment if he knew what Cohen was doing

Let’s be honest, one of us is a hack and it ain’t me

 

[*Z*]

How uninformed are you?

No Hillary emails were released by Wikileaks.

The adults are talking, go back to the kids table.

You're right, I concede this point to you. They just made them into a searchable database. It was the DNC hacked emails they released.

 

[Cojopi Extomino]

I’m not impartial because I won’t say people are guilty before a trial? Lol. YOU said this is alleged

No you're a hack because you're avoiding the topic entirely. If the only thing you're interested is actual charges, not just allegations.... why are you all over this thread?

If they have the goods that wrongdoings/Crimes occurred than the proper punishment should be applied

Really? That's it? You can make 40 posts in here about people's agendas and corruption, but when actual physical examples of the president breaking the law are available, you avoid them? You don't make any posts about it?

Seems like you have different standards for different people.

You really wanna keep *spazzing on my impartiality?

*pointing out you're an obvious troll

And, yes.

Would you like a side by side of you and I on the issues?

Sure, my very last post called for Bill Clinton to be impeached for engaging in pay-for-play.

Now go ahead and post 3 posts of you directly critical of Trump(no "if he did it then I'm mad"s by the way, that shit does not count, at all).... I've requested this so many times, from so many of you, and every time.... I get nothing.

Can you point to anything impartial on your part. I can find plenty of posts of me bashing Trump and his administration

Yup, but the trick is you have to engage in threads not about Trump, for reasons other than to defend him, to actually notice it. So you definitely haven't seen them.

I’m on record supporting impeachment if he knew what Cohen was doing

Correct, you're on record stupidly suggesting the president didn't know what his personal lawyer was doing.... on his behalf. Posts that stand as a testament to your hackery, not your impartiality.

Let’s be honest, one of us is a hack and it ain’t me

It's weird, for some reason the second I read "let's be honest", I knew what would follow would be completely inaccurate.

It's like you've got a reputation now or something...

 

[LuchaBear]

Dems have been doing well in special elections since the 2016 Election along with State legislatures.

I don't think Corey Stewart winning the GOP primary for Senator in VA is going to bode well for them. The Dems currently have the seat with Tim Kaine as the incumbent but having Stewart paraded around as a US Senate Candidate is a bad look

Did Tim Kaine get Hillary one vote? (Besides his own family.)

Have Liberals looked into why they lost the elections in the first place? Or is Trump being a clown and moaning about him for 4 years supposed to help them win the mid terms? Possible FBI collisions doesn't paint the whole picture, not even close. Did we forget about the split with in the Democratic party between the establishment and progressives? I remember you posted an article about them possibly doing away with superdelegates and if that's actually going to happen, than great stuff but in terms of who on the Left is going to be the one to defeat Trump in the mid terms... Who's that going to be??

I'm seeing way too much focus being put on Trump while very little or none at all has been focused at looking with in the party, how to come together and win again.

 

[Darth_Inv1ctu5]

Does the FBI get to vote? Do they not get to speak about the election and who's in it? Or am I just reading this wrong?

We are to pretend that government employees think and behave in a politically impartial manner at all times as they are beholden to behave that way by the virtue of being public servants DUH.

 

[LuchaBear]

Me, for one.

You're just a puppet, nothing more.

 

[SBJJ]

No you're a hack because you're avoiding the topic entirely. If the only thing you're interested is actual charges, not just allegations.... why are you all over this thread?



Really? That's it? You can make 40 posts in here about people's agendas and corruption, but when actual physical examples of the president breaking the law are available, you avoid them? You don't make any posts about it?

Seems like you have different standards for different people.



*pointing out you're an obvious troll

And, yes.



Sure, my very last post called for Bill Clinton to be impeached for engaging in pay-for-play.

Now go ahead and post 3 posts of you directly critical of Trump(no "if he did it then I'm mad"s by the way, that shit does not count, at all).... I've requested this so many times, from so many of you, and every time.... I get nothing.



Yup, but the trick is you have to engage in threads not about Trump, for reasons other than to defend him, to actually notice it. So you definitely haven't seen them.



Correct, you're on record stupidly suggesting the president didn't know what his personal lawyer was doing.... on his behalf. Posts that stand as a testament to your hackery, not your impartiality.



It's weird, for some reason the second I read "let's be honest", I knew what would follow would be completely inaccurate.

It's like you've got a reputation now or something...

I’m not sure if u are aware of how u look when u post this way

I have never said Strzok should be prosecuted or that what he did was illegal. I posted what he texted

Once again, if Trump or anyone broke laws here they should be punished.

You do this with everyone. You just continually argue and keep arguing when u do not give the exact answer u want

Calling for Clinton to be impeached 20 years later does not show u as impartial. LOFL!!!!

When u can provide recent posts of CURRENT events then we can talk. As of now u are a 4 time banned hack

 

[Jorge Luis Borges]

This report exposes the Midyear Investigation as a major clusterfuck. It was botched at almost every step and numerous agents showed signs of strong political bias that they interjected into discussions about the investigation. Also, many FBI employees at all levels leaked info to the press in many cases in exchange for dinner or favors.

If I were a Hillary supporter, I'd be mad as hell. It is conceivable that FBI incompetence (or worse) cost her the election.
As a Trump supporter, I don't trust these clowns at all.

The biggest loser here is the credibility of the FBI. After Mueller concludes his investigation, Trump (or Pence) should fire almost everyone involved with either investigation.

 

[Cojopi Extomino]

Did Tim Kaine get Hillary one vote? (Besides his own family.)

Have Liberals looked into why they lost the elections in the first place? Or is Trump being a clown and moaning about him for 4 years supposed to help them win the mid terms? Possible FBI collisions doesn't paint the whole picture, not even close. Did we forget about the split with in the Democratic party between the establishment and progressives? I remember you posted an article about them possibly doing away with superdelegates and if that's actually going to happen, than great stuff but in terms of who on the Left is going to be the one to defeat Trump in the mid terms... Who's that going to be??

I'm seeing way too much focus being put on Trump while very little or none at all has been focused at looking with in the party, how to come together and win again.

At this point I'm kinda hoping Trump win's again. The lasting damage he's gonna do to the republicans and our political system as a whole might just be necessary to truly fix what's broken.

But sadly you're right, Democrats should be appealing to the cult of personality with some kind of shit talking reality TV star if they wanna have a chance. These few honest politicians they're trying to push with nothing but reasonable discussions of policy are never gonna attract Trump voters. They don't want honesty or integrity, they wanna root for a guy to win nothing in particular. If we don't give them that, they won't even listen to anything about the issues.

Sad, sad shit.

 

[Cojopi Extomino]

This report exposes the Midyear Investigation as a major clusterfuck. It was botched at almost every step and numerous agents showed signs of strong political bias that they interjected into discussions about the investigation. Also, many FBI employees at all levels leaked info to the press in many cases in exchange for dinner or favors.

If I were a Hillary supporter, I'd be mad as hell. It is conceivable that FBI incompetence (or worse) cost her the election.
As a Trump supporter, I don't trust these clowns at all.

The biggest loser here is the credibility of the FBI. After Mueller concludes his investigation, Trump (or Pence) should fire almost everyone involved with either investigation.

Can you please explain how this indictment of the FBI's impartiality as a whole, erases the discoveries, indictments, charges and pleas involved with Mueller's investigation?

If I find out a police department hates black people, I'm not gonna suggest we release all the black people in their jails even though one was found over a dead body with a bloody knife in their hand. Would you?

 

[Cojopi Extomino]

I’m not sure if u are aware of how u look when u post this way

Why would I care how I look in the eyes of someone like you....

I have never said Strzok should be prosecuted or that what he did was illegal. I posted what he texted

Correct, you felt the need to highlight and discuss something you yourself admit isn't illegal. You just don't like the corruption right?

So why when there is similar corruption, of a SITTING politician, that comes with actual evidence of criminality.... are you entirely absent from the discussion?

The only answer one can reach is "you have different standards for different politicians".

Once again, if Trump or anyone broke laws here they should be punished.

Hey SBJJ, grow some balls real quick and answer this: Do you think Trump broke any laws, based on the information in that thread?

You do this with everyone. You just continually argue and keep arguing when u do not give the exact answer u want

No see you don't really get it;

"That was very wrong of _____ to do, and here is why....."

Is in no way shape or form, the same as-

"Well if ____ did do____, then that's bad."

So those posts of yours that say "well if trump did bad he should be punished" don't mean shit when you follow it up with nothing but "here's why I don't think he did bad".

Do you get it?

Calling for Clinton to be impeached 20 years later does not show u as impartial. LOFL!!!!

It was clearly making light, but what else could I call for? Are you suggesting he should be imprisoned? For what?

Here's an idea, if we're so against what Clinton did, let's focus on the biggest guy doing it RIGHT NOW. Sounds like a good idea to you right?

Then how do you explain your posts?

When u can provide recent posts of CURRENT events then we can talk. As of now u are a 4 time banned hack

It's all right there in a thread that YOU ARE AVOIDING. You don't wanna go in there, because you won't be able to write off what you see. We both know it. So you'd rather stay in here, talking about how wrong and corrupt the FBI is, and how this all negates the entire Russia investigation.... all while avoiding actual evidence of criminality from sitting politicians.

You're see-through little fella. Like saran wrap, only not as sturdy.

 

[SBJJ]

Why would I care how I look in the eyes of someone like you....



Correct, you felt the need to highlight and discuss something you yourself admit isn't illegal. You just don't like the corruption right?

So why when similar corruption, of a SITTING politician, that comes with actual evidence of criminality.... are you entirely absent in the discussion?

The only answer one can reach is "you have different standards for different politicians".



Hey SBJJ, grow some balls real quick and answer this: Do you think Trump broke any laws, based on the information in that thread?



No see you don't really get it;

"That was very wrong of _____ to do, and here is why....."

Is in no way shape or form, the same as-

"Well if ____ did do____, then that's bad."

So those posts of yours that say "well if trump did bad he should be punished" don't mean shit when you follow it up with nothing but "here's why I don't think he did bad".

Do you get it?



It was clearly making light, but what else could I call for? Are you suggesting he should be imprisoned? For what?

Here's an idea, if we're so against what Clinton did, let's focus on the biggest guy doing it RIGHT NOW. Sounds like a good idea to you right?

Then how do you explain your posts?



It's all right there in a thread that YOU ARE AVOIDING. You don't wanna go in there, because you won't be able to write off what you see. We both know it. So you'd rather stay in here, talking about wrong and corrupt the FBI is and how this all negates the entire Russia investigation.... all while avoiding actual evidence of criminality from sitting politicians.

You're see-through little fella. Like saran wrap, only not as sturdy.

Ok tough guy. Since it’s 100% for sure that the Trump Broke the law with his charity. How bout we bet on it?

And seriously. Go back and look at what u post in reply to comments. It’s as if u are not even actually responding to the comments. It’s like u are in your own world