- Joined
- Sep 15, 2011
- Messages
- 4,069
- Reaction score
- 0
I hadnt thought of it, but lyoto would have to be top 4 of all time at that point.
Rampage would beat anderson? You cant be serious. And rua has always been much, much better than rampage
Because he would of one a title at what is not his natural weight at 205 against Rashard Evans and then gone down to his natural weight and take out the guys who was never in trouble, never hurt, barely even hit and then knocked out twice... the so called greatest of all time in anderson silva.
Of course, im talking about Chris weidman.
Lyoto Machida wins belt at 205 where he is a chubby little shit, gets into good shape and beats the and beats the man the "greatest of all time" could not.
Brendan-Schaub
lyoto Machida> Anderson silva
Lyoto Machida will proberly win a few more contests in defense of the title after his title fight with Chris weidman also, even furthering the distance between him and Anderson silva.
Styles make fights. Lyoto never would have had any trouble with Sonnen. Anderson on the other hand has more diverse striking, movement & the ability to control a fight better than Lyoto.
Anderson wouldn't have struggled with Rampage, Hendo [As we saw] or Shogun [Both Rampage & Hendo don't utilise their grappling in a way which can threaten Anderson. Their one dimensional striking will leave them picked apart]. He may not have done as well against Davis.
You can't compare. If Weidman wins he will go on to crush Vitor. If Machida wins [And I think he will] - Vitor may end up taking the strap.
Why wouldn't Rampage grapple? It would be the most obvious way to win. Even he is not that dumb, actually when Rampage was champion he showed how willing he was to go to the floor against Henderson, takeing him down in 4 of the 5 rounds.. so why not against Anderson?
Why? I was only really watching UFC at the time, they made a big deal about mach on commeraty for the hughes fight, but thats all i got. I watched pride from 2005... had to go back and catched up on what i missed.
It is what it is, i had no idea about any of it when i started, just watched what i watched....
Because he would of one a title at what is not his natural weight at 205 against Rashard Evans and then gone down to his natural weight and take out the guys who was never in trouble, never hurt, barely even hit and then knocked out twice... the so called greatest of all time in anderson silva.
Of course, im talking about Chris weidman.
Lyoto Machida wins belt at 205 where he is a chubby little shit, gets into good shape and beats the and beats the man the"greatest of all time" could not.
In other words you aren't educated enough to be spouting such nonsense.
Gotta have some title defenses to really be considered a champion so no he would not be considered the best.
no, you have to win a title to be considered champion, that is how it works.
Rampage hates rasseling and just wants to stand and bang bro. What's the point in fans talking about who the goat might or might not be, but at the same time conspire as what might have happened 5 years ago if so and so fought at a weight class. You fools look like WWF nerds or pokemon trainers. Grow up and enjoy it as it happens
Did you not read the title to this thread? READING COMPREHENSION, that's how life works.
Trust me i'd love to fulfill your username and get rid of another mouthbreather. You're wasting space and taking up my air.
Because he would of one a title at what is not his natural weight at 205 against Rashard Evans.
It's a matter of what you value more.
Lyoto fought bigger and tougher competition with less defenses.
And anderson fought mostly smaller lesser competition competition but had more title defenses.
I tend to not care about title defenses and I just look at them as any other fight and I look more at who the guy is fighting.
The Machida huggers on here are the most ridiculous ever. If he was so good, why wasn't he ever consistently the #1-2 guy in his divisions? Fact is Machida has been consistently ranked from #3 onward for the vast majority of his prime so in no way shape or form does his career deserve to be rated so highly, especially against guys who were the #1 guy in their division for vast periods of time. He has good wins, but they mean shit if you weren't the best in the world.