Law ICE tracking app

Crazy Source said:
Nope. They are breaking the law by doing his bidding. They are complicit. Can't wash your hands just because the higher ups told you to do it. That's weak.
Click to expand...
I'm not saying that, of course they need to be held accountable, but it's the higher ups that set the policy.
 
italiamusica said:
I know right? Almost like when others were helping jewish people hide. Oh wait...
Click to expand...
Explain? I can't believe anyone would parallel what it appears you might be. That could be peak emotional confusion...

But more on topic, isn't the argument often, they are fleeing economic hardship? But they have access to an iPhone with apps for interfering with law enforcement that's the will of the citizens of the country they illegally entered?
 
LangfordBarrow said:
I get that but we have Constitutional Rights for a reason and Law Enforcement needs to have transparency. If this is the status quo, maybe some officer is protected despite this being their job, but then a faultless citizen loses their rights.
Click to expand...
Same reason S.W.A.T. or gang police are often masked. Retaliation against law enforcement is real. There's bad people out there that would love to dox and murder police as a deterrent to others. You have to stay ahead of criminals. Sometimes it ain't pretty.

Crazy Source said:
Nope. Quite your fucking job when you are asked to break the law.
Click to expand...
What laws are they breaking?
 
Back to hating LEO’s I see, typical
Durrrr why they wear masks

 
Confucamus said:
Be specific. What laws are they breaking.
Click to expand...
Kidnapping?

Definitions of kidnapping:

"the action of abducting someone and holding them captive."

"To kidnap someone is to take them away illegally and by force, and usually to hold them prisoner"

"the unlawful abduction and confinement of a person against their will"

crime-van-kidnapping-scene-vector-36399907.jpg
- stock footage of masked criminals kidnapping someone and taking them away in a vehicle.
 
Last edited:
Confucamus said:
Be specific. What laws are they breaking.
Click to expand...
DUE PROCESS. It is a tenet of the Constitution. You have to be read your Miranda rights. You have the right to a lawyer. You have the right to stay silent.

Miranda rights are a set of legal rights that protect individuals who are in police custody and being interrogated. These rights, established by the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, ensure that individuals are aware of their constitutional protections against self-incrimination and their right to legal counsel. They include the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the warning that anything said can be used against them in court.

Key Components of Miranda Rights:

    • Right to Remain Silent:
      Individuals have the right to refuse to answer questions from law enforcement officers.
    • Right to an Attorney:
      Suspects have the right to have an attorney present during questioning. If they cannot afford one, an attorney will be appointed for them.
    • Anything You Say Can Be Used Against You:
      Law enforcement must inform individuals that anything they say can and will be used as evidence in court.
When are Miranda Rights Required?
Miranda rights are triggered when two conditions are met: 1) the individual is in custody, and 2) they are being interrogated.

    • Custody:
      .
      This means the individual has been formally arrested or is significantly deprived of their freedom of movement.
    • Interrogation:
      .
      This refers to any questioning by law enforcement that is likely to elicit an incriminating response.
What Happens if Miranda Rights are Not Read?
If law enforcement fails to properly administer Miranda warnings before custodial interrogation, any statements obtained from the suspect may be inadmissible as evidence in court. However, this does not mean the case will be automatically dismissed. Other evidence, such as physical evidence found during a search, can still be used.


  • Miranda warning - Wikipedia
    The Miranda warning is part of a preventive criminal procedure rule that law enforcement are required to administer to protect an ...
    Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


  • What Are Your Miranda Rights?
    Invoking Your Miranda Rights If the individual indicates in any manner, at any time prior to or during questioning, that he or she...
    Miranda Warning


  • Miranda Requirements | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

    Constitution Annotated


  • Show all
 
Goatnald about to counter this by making another banger of an app. Just like he did with truth social to counter Twitter.
 
This just enabling shooters and violence like we just saw on a LEO.
 
Confucamus said:
Same reason S.W.A.T. or gang police are often masked. Retaliation against law enforcement is real. There's bad people out there that would love to dox and murder police as a deterrent to others. You have to stay ahead of criminals. Sometimes it ain't pretty.


What laws are they breaking?
Click to expand...
They can wear a mask but there's no getting around having to identify yourself and your department.
 
Crazy Source said:
DUE PROCESS. It is a tenet of the Constitution. You have to be read your Miranda rights. You have the right to a lawyer. You have the right to stay silent.

Miranda rights are a set of legal rights that protect individuals who are in police custody and being interrogated. These rights, established by the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, ensure that individuals are aware of their constitutional protections against self-incrimination and their right to legal counsel. They include the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the warning that anything said can be used against them in court.

Key Components of Miranda Rights:

    • Right to Remain Silent:
      Individuals have the right to refuse to answer questions from law enforcement officers.
    • Right to an Attorney:
      Suspects have the right to have an attorney present during questioning. If they cannot afford one, an attorney will be appointed for them.
    • Anything You Say Can Be Used Against You:
      Law enforcement must inform individuals that anything they say can and will be used as evidence in court.
When are Miranda Rights Required?
Miranda rights are triggered when two conditions are met: 1) the individual is in custody, and 2) they are being interrogated.

    • Custody:
      .
      This means the individual has been formally arrested or is significantly deprived of their freedom of movement.
    • Interrogation:
      .
      This refers to any questioning by law enforcement that is likely to elicit an incriminating response.
What Happens if Miranda Rights are Not Read?
If law enforcement fails to properly administer Miranda warnings before custodial interrogation, any statements obtained from the suspect may be inadmissible as evidence in court. However, this does not mean the case will be automatically dismissed. Other evidence, such as physical evidence found during a search, can still be used.


  • Miranda warning - Wikipedia
    The Miranda warning is part of a preventive criminal procedure rule that law enforcement are required to administer to protect an ...
    Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


  • What Are Your Miranda Rights?
    Invoking Your Miranda Rights If the individual indicates in any manner, at any time prior to or during questioning, that he or she...
    Miranda Warning


  • Miranda Requirements | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

    Constitution Annotated


  • Show all
Click to expand...
confirmed gimmick.
thanks, bro.
 
Hog-train said:
There's this fan fiction going on that no one is getting due process before being deported. Due process does not mean a full hearing. Oftentimes, it's just a cursory review by an immigration judge.

Everyone complaining about "no due process" is really talking about what's called "expedited removal."

Expedited removal was created in 1996 and has typically been used at the border to quickly expel those who cross illegally. Now it is being used throughout the country.

"Under the expanded expedited removal policy, undocumented immigrants anywhere in the United States, who cannot prove they have resided in the U.S. for at least two years will be subject to an expedited deportation process."

Every President has used expedited removal in the past. George Bush used it to deport anyone within two weeks of entry and within 100 miles from the border. Obama and Biden also used expedited removal and it's a big reason Obama's deportation numbers were so large.

All Trump did was expand the policy so they're using it for anywhere in the country and for anyone who came in the last two years.

Trump is also using expedited removal for people coming into immigration court and as soon as their asylum cases get dismissed, he's removing them.

So technically, what he's doing is completely legal. All this hand wringing about "no due process" is not true at all. The cursory review of the case is getting due process.
Click to expand...
Technically legal. Expedited removal. Why are people dying while in ICE custody? So why did a Canadian die in ICE detention? Why are we seeing growing number of wrongful deaths and people wrongfully apprehended, abducted and caged?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,268,456
Messages
57,532,752
Members
175,741
Latest member
Minouthecat

Share this page

Back
Top