Just rewatched this fight. People need to choose their words more carefully. It makes no sense to say "Draw at best". How is this a Draw "at best"? Fedor clearly won round 2 and also won round 3 unless you think Fabio's jabs outweigh Fedor's blitzes with knees and punches (they don't). Unless you are trying to be contrarian, there is no debate as to who won which rounds. The only debate is whether Round 1 is a 10-8 or 10-9 for Maldonado. I think it's an interesting debate. Fedor won the first minute of the round, the next 2 1/1 minutes were all Maldonado, Fedor came back and the rest of the round was decently even. The fight could have been scored a Draw and probably should have been, but no way could it have been scored against Fedor. It makes no sense.
There are two ways to score this fight:
Round 1 10-18 Maldonado
Round 2 10-9 Fedor
Round 3 10-9 Fedor
28-28 Draw
or
Round 1 10-9 Maldonado
Round 2 10-9 Fedor
Round 3 10-19 Fedor
29-28 Fedor
People need to stop with this "Fabio won" nonsense. Please explain how he could have won this fight. You think round 1 was a 10-7? Please. We have seen more dominant rounds be scored 10-9 and fights not stopped. People just like to complain because Fedor is an all time great and he is polarizing. Comments like this are ridiculous:
If you thought rounds 2 and 3 could have gone in "either direction" you are very poor at scoring fights.