- Joined
- Oct 26, 2006
- Messages
- 15,231
- Reaction score
- 1
Yea not the father
It’s in the woman’s body not his
So a father starts having rights when? When its out of the body?
Have you seen it the other way around?
Yea not the father
It’s in the woman’s body not his
So a father starts having rights when? When its out of the body?
Have you seen it the other way around?
It's ironic that the most staunch pro-life people, those who believe "life" absolutely begins at conception, are usually also strong advocates of an originalist interpretation of the Constitution.
Yet in the America of the Founders, and for decades afterwards, abortion was deemed legal until the point in the pregnancy where movement of the fetus could be felt through the mother's abdomen (usually 15 to 20 weeks).
Not the father? Hmmm
If that thing has a heart beat, you fucked up if you deliberately kill it. According to high morals and all
Odd that no one considers the fathers opinion in the matter.
Do you know why planned parent hood was started?
You go skiing and get in an accident your fault deal with the consequences no medical care.You get pregnant, your fault. No abortions.
Bumping this because it's easily the most relevant and best post itt.Some facts according to the CDC:
91.5% of abortions were performed at ≤13 weeks’ gestation; a smaller number of abortions (7.2%) were performed at 14–20 weeks’ gestation, and even fewer (1.3%) were performed at ≥21 weeks’ gestation.
My view is that it is a non-issue, as the fetus had the ability to become a human life at every stage, the probability increasing in development. Selecting a “cut off” point at any age before birth is a relatively arbitrary distinction.
It is also rather immaterial, as statistics show almost all abortions are performed early. Those performed late are generally for medical reasons.
I’m fine with a cut-off age to appease the anti-abortion crowd, provided there is a caveat to allow for abortions for medical reasons which includes fetal abnormalities. Logically, it doesn’t make sense to have a cut-off age, but I understand the visceral and emotional side of it is a different story.
Bumping this because it's easily the most relevant and best post itt.
You including the less likely involuntary pregnancies?
You go skiing and get in an accident your fault deal with the consequences no medical care.
So if you don’t want people murdering babies you should take it off their hands or they’ll murder it.
Like he said, it depends on the woman having the baby.I am trying to find out at what point it is OK to kill your child by those who support the idea. This topic comes up often and most, if not all the supporters seem quite confused themselves.
If there is no clear line (ie. 8 1/2 months, 6 months, 4 weeks, next day), then what are we even discussing?
But you realize that this means that your idea of what is and is not okay is dependent on medical technology of the day you live inso I'm all for allowing abortions up to the point where the baby is viable outside the womb.
But you realize that this means that your idea of what is and is not okay is dependent on medical technology of the day you live in
So, I guess we can go around stabbing adults who cling to life on machines?"I'm all for abortions up until the baby is viable outside the womb without medical intervention.