How undervalued are knockdowns nowadays?

2004 account

For a fair sport/true mma fan, ain't no shill
@Silver
Joined
Apr 29, 2018
Messages
12,719
Reaction score
16,557
It seems that knockdowns aren’t worth much anymore seeing that fighters can legitimately drop their opponent multiple times in a match while not getting knockdowned themselves and still lose the round/fight.

What is happening? Shouldn’t mma judging reward these feats more heavily?
 
It seems like 50% of the time a knockdown stops the fight nowadays.

Early stoppage loss for Miocic comes to mind right off the bat.
 
Yeah it's weird. I mean, didn't they change the rules so that damage wins you rounds? I am one of the people who thought Romero won the second fight btw
 
I think the new system counts them worth more, and in theory makes 10-8s a lot more likely. Problem is the Athletic commissions are nuts, and half of them are going off the old judging system. It literally drives me nuts to hear this commission has not accepted the new unified rules, for lord knows why.
 
every knockdown should equal 3 takedowns.
 
It depends on how hurt the guy was and what he did in the round.

I don't particularly mind it so long as they guy that got dropped wasn't in danger of getting finished or had more success for the better part of the round.
 
It seems that knockdowns aren’t worth much anymore seeing that fighters can legitimately drop their opponent multiple times in a match while not getting knockdowned themselves and still lose the round/fight.

What is happening? Shouldn’t mma judging reward these feats more heavily?

I'm not sure this is rally an issue. Can you name a few recent fights where a fighter had a knockdown in a round but lost that round?
 
knockdowns are irrelevant. mma involves both standup and ground fighting. it just means the fight continues in a different position. damage is what matters.
 
1st knockdown should win the fight
 
Back
Top