Just curious, let’s say the UFC was to offer a monthly subscription service that offered access to all live cards (including Ppv, prelims, etc.) and their entire past library. The service would be available on all streaming devices with easy, reliable access. What, if anything, would you be willing to pay for a service like this?
50 a month is too high. You wouldn't get a lot of people paying for that. How many PPVs are in a month? The goal is to make it less to have more people willing to subscribe. Not have the price higher and have less people subscribe.If it was 50 a month all fans would be paying for it. I would pay 80 at the Most.
I do think you're right, but I still think they have a huge piracy problem to deal with before they can really unlock their potential value. The price is the easier thing to handle though, they really should just test it out, set one ppv at $20 bucks with headliner they know how much he/she typically draws and see where they end up.
Couldn’t agree more, and Netflix and Spotify are good examples. I do like the Spotify example even more considering how commonplace music piracy was. I still remember getting a CD burner when they came out and went crazy.Netflix and Spotify were among the first to demonstrate reasonable pricing, easy access and a good user experience is how you win over pirates.
A UFC PPV is not only obscenely expensive for average people, but its already behind a paywall. You have to pay $6/month just for the ability to then buy a $65/event PPV.
If we drew a Venn diagram there would be a substantial overlap between people currently pirating and those would would pay $25/month subscription.
Gotta say, I really don’t understand the kind of person that spends time on an mma forum discussing UFC regularly but is unwilling to spend a penny to watch it.
Realistically, I'd pay $20 a month.
Agreed. I want the mens only. Not likely though. Soon we will have trans fights on all cards. Guess who would be headlining.$9.99 a month for all male content.