Hot Take How much more proof do you need?

Many of the ranked fighters today do not have a particularly strong background in another sport.

A lot of ranked fighters and even a few champions never did a martial art before MMA, and plenty more don't have a serious credential that infers any form of mastery in their first martial art.

And a decent amount, if not most fighters who started with another martial art probably did so because either they did not have an MMA gym when growing up, or because MMA gyms in general are not geared toward younger people or hobbiest. It has little to do with a conscious decision of trying to become the best fighter.



If anything, people 20 years ago said things like "you have" to go from a singular martial art first. This sounds like a traditionalist way of thinking, there is really no reason why someone could not be a great fighter training in MMA from the ground up. Fighting is too diverse for someone's base to affect them that much.

I disagree. Guys who started in MMA being ranked today is a product of most guys starting MMA.
Whenever there is someone who is elite at 1 thing and decent at a 2nd thing they standout. (IE. Khabib, Islam, Poatan, Gane, Borz) Almost all the very best in every era are exceptional at, at least 1. Then there are those who are elite at 2 or 3.

Right now .ost guys are mediocre at everything.

The caveat is there are some who are not seemingly elite at 1 particular thing but they have exceptional fight IQ, footwork, etc... those guys rise too but there is less of them and they are a tier below the ones who are elite at 1 or 2 disciplines
 
Remember when people used to think Derrick Lewis and Ngannou were basically the same? And they would cite that if Ngannou is a top 5 HW that must mean the current crop are terrible. That looks pretty stupid now.
I honestly dont think Francis is much more skilled than Derrick Lewis... simply a better athlete... Francis has horrible striking technique and garbage wrestling technique.... hes literally just big and explosive with more than 5 minutes of cardio....
 
so this proves that Ngannou did have a point, when he was demanding more money. Cause there are few of active mma heavyweights, who can carry the division at the highest level
That may also include himself though, wasn't his top billing (against Stipe) like 350,000? That is no way near the top selling ppv numbers for the UFC
 
I disagree. Guys who started in MMA being ranked today is a product of most guys starting MMA.
Whenever there is someone who is elite at 1 thing and decent at a 2nd thing they standout. (IE. Khabib, Islam, Poatan, Gane, Borz) Almost all the very best in every era are exceptional at, at least 1. Then there are those who are elite at 2 or 3.

Right now .ost guys are mediocre at everything.

The caveat is there are some who are not seemingly elite at 1 particular thing but they have exceptional fight IQ, footwork, etc... those guys rise too but there is less of them and they are a tier below the ones who are elite at 1 or 2 disciplines



I dont know how anyone can say Volkinaski is on a tier below the elite of someone who is a specialist in one discipline. Joshua Van and most of the best flyweights started either with MMA or didn't do much in their initial sport before cross training and becoming extremely well rounded (Kyoji Horiguchi comes to mind, as a karate fighter who branched out before becoming specialized).

Probably half of the top ten at Bantamweight is like that also, and it's the deepest division in MMA. Featherweight is pretty similar. You'd have to combine every base to get a higher number than those that started with MMA, which is basically MMA vs The Field not MMA vs BJJ or MMA vs Muay Thai.


You're basically saying most of the best fighters in the world are mediocre fighters.
 
Waldo Acosta is top 5 HW.

He barely scraped by super old super shop worn Arlovski.

You morons who claim the newer generation is always better are hilarious.

What do you think a peak Arlovski would've done to where's Waldo?

If you think Gane, Tom or any other current HW would come close to being top 3 (much less Waldo a top 5) at any time from 2003-2015, I want what your smoking.

Werdum, Cain, JDS, Barnett, Carwin, Brock, Fedor, Nog, Crocop, Tim, Arlovski, Reem all destroy today's HW with ease.

Heck even Rothwell, Nelson, Big Cat, Crazy Horse or Gonzaga would be top 3 today

I have a theory about the current state of MMA.

15-20 years ago, the top guys were dudes who grew up wanting to be Bruce Lee/Van Damme/name your MA hero. That or guys who were in the amateur circuit for wrestling or judo or some other martial art. They would do MMA regardless if they made money or not, just so happened that promotions and sponsors were willing to pay them for fighting. When it became apparent you could make money in MMA when the UFC made it big, guys would specifically train to land a spot in the UFC or other promotions. That's why this current crop seems not as good as 15-20 years ago.

WME-TKO also turned the competitive structure of the UFC to shit, it became all about clicks or views, not actual merit. But all sports have this problem, just not MMA. The heavyweight division is the guiltiest of all weight classes because you got guys who'd rather play Football or Basketball or Rugby but couldn't cut it, so they went into MMA.
 
I dont know how anyone can say Volkinaski is on a tier below the elite of someone who is a specialist in one discipline. Joshua Van and most of the best flyweights started either with MMA or didn't do much in their initial sport before cross training and becoming extremely well rounded (Kyoji Horiguchi comes to mind, as a karate fighter who branched out before becoming specialized).

Probably half of the top ten at Bantamweight is like that also, and it's the deepest division in MMA. Featherweight is pretty similar. You'd have to combine every base to get a higher number than those that started with MMA, which is basically MMA vs The Field not MMA vs BJJ or MMA vs Muay Thai.


You're basically saying most of the best fighters in the world are mediocre fighters.

Volk is in that category of fighters who is not elite per say at any one particular discipline but he is extraordinarily good at foot work and fight IQ. That is even rarer than the likes of MM, GSP, JBJ, BJ, Fedor who are elite at more than 1 discipline. All of them started with a single MA as a base/foundation.

IMO Van is not particularly elite. Fly W is shallow and has always been shallow. Van is one of my faves, cuz he is exciting and has guts but he got lucky vs Pantoja.

Here are the top BW
Yan- base/elite at boxing
Merab- base/elite at wrestling
Sandhagen- base/ elite at kickboxing
Omalley- same as sandhagen though he went to mma sooner. Maybe he fits the mma from the start category
Umar - base / elite wrestler

Off the top of my head Volk, Pantoja and Moreno (maybe Omalley) are the most notable who fit that mold of not being elite at a single discipline before going into mma. And again fly w is shallow.... and I think Volk did a lot of wrestling forst though Austin's are not known for elite wrestling.
From the past I can only think of Rory Mcdonald.

Now if you go up in weight classes like MW, LHW, HW there are more top guys currently who fit in the mold of not elite at anything/trained mma early instead of becoming elite at 1 discipline... and those weight classes are all trash
 
I have a theory about the current state of MMA.

15-20 years ago, the top guys were dudes who grew up wanting to be Bruce Lee/Van Damme/name your MA hero. That or guys who were in the amateur circuit for wrestling or judo or some other martial art. They would do MMA regardless if they made money or not, just so happened that promotions and sponsors were willing to pay them for fighting. When it became apparent you could make money in MMA when the UFC made it big, guys would specifically train to land a spot in the UFC or other promotions. That's why this current crop seems not as good as 15-20 years ago.

WME-TKO also turned the competitive structure of the UFC to shit, it became all about clicks or views, not actual merit. But all sports have this problem, just not MMA. The heavyweight division is the guiltiest of all weight classes because you got guys who'd rather play Football or Basketball or Rugby but couldn't cut it, so they went into MMA.
I agree with your theory mostly. Not sure about them being Bruce Lee fans or whatever but for sure many more from those past eras would just fight regardless of pay. They just wanted to do it and pay was a plus.

And for sure the current biz model is to blame in large part. I just don't know about the failed big athlete part.

In the past the HW were much better had more skill anywhere overall. Now that there is money in it big guys that want to fight have a place to go. I look at things like wrestling and in the past there was nothing but UFC for guys like Randy, hendo, etc... and that was new. I don't get why more wrestlers done come to ufc anymore now that there is more money.

To add to your theory I'd say that the money and perceived opportunity cost of losing is a major deterrent for taking risks to win. Its more about fighting not to lose now. Its like a problem with the culture in fighting (in large part due to the biz model).

Ironically taking risks is exciting and can get you places if your an exciting fighter. The problem it also takes away some of your leverage if you have losses.... unless your a fake bad blood guy that gets casuals to watch.

Now that I think about it, its like the guys who are fighting for money rather than glory are low risk takers who reduce action. The guys who love to fight will take risks but unless they trash talk they wont get title shots due to losses. Meanwhile the non-risk takers have a long road to a TS unless they are trash talkers.

The result is boring fighters who show little skill/offensive technique but trash talk move up in rank. Fighters who take risks and talk trash move up too but since they have losses it seems undeserved especially if there are other fighters with losses who show better technique/skill but don't trash talk who are lower in rank.
 
Some examples to my last point

Tuivasa stays with 6 straight losses cuz he is a exciting while Jailton gets cut cuz he is boring (despite the only high level grappler HW). Being boring and taking losses is the worst case for a fighter. Even if youre skilled

Colby is boring but talks trash so he gets unlimited TS

Aldo was exciting but no trash talking. Could not get an immediate rematch despite long reign cuz Conor was exciting and talks trash.

Machida was highly skilled but seen as boring and didnt say much. Long time for a TS. Perriera gets fast tracked cuz he's exciting (no trash talk but narrative with Izzy who is a trash talker)

Merab - boring. Took forever to get a shot. Sandhagen too (2nd TS) once his style got a little boring. Meanwhile Omalley gets undeserved shots and easy defense vs Vera

There are tons more examples but this is starting to get long lol
 
Waldo Acosta is top 5 HW.

He barely scraped by super old super shop worn Arlovski.

You morons who claim the newer generation is always better are hilarious.

What do you think a peak Arlovski would've done to where's Waldo?

If you think Gane, Tom or any other current HW would come close to being top 3 (much less Waldo a top 5) at any time from 2003-2015, I want what your smoking.

Werdum, Cain, JDS, Barnett, Carwin, Brock, Fedor, Nog, Crocop, Tim, Arlovski, Reem all destroy today's HW with ease.

Heck even Rothwell, Nelson, Big Cat, Crazy Horse or Gonzaga would be top 3 today
You forgot yo mention Mir and overeem
 
Arlovski also got a gift decision vs Jake Collier, settle down bro.

Waldo was green and had very few fights when he fought AA. Sometimes, fighters get better. Wild concept to some apparently.
 
Screenshot-2026-02-13-225216.jpg
 
Volk is in that category of fighters who is not elite per say at any one particular discipline but he is extraordinarily good at foot work and fight IQ. That is even rarer than the likes of MM, GSP, JBJ, BJ, Fedor who are elite at more than 1 discipline. All of them started with a single MA as a base/foundation.

I dont think all those guys were elite at one discipline. GSP in particular I feel is more like hitting a checkbox.

Yes, Kyokushin Karate and he while he does credit it for helping his timing, nearly his entire skill set was crafted after he had turned pro in MMA. It would be an odd example to cite GSP as someone who mastered a martial art as proof that starting from one base will make someone better than someone who went into an MMA gym from the start. GSP was not a credentialed karateka, he was a hobbiest. Most of the things GSP learned were at tri-star, and his fighting style is reflective of that.



Demetris Johnson was only a high school wrestler, albeit a decent one. Again, nearly everything he learned was built from Matt Hume (who is an MMA coach), and his fighting style is highly reflective of that. I don't really think a couple of years of high school wrestling is enough to be considered serious mastery, especially considering how high level MMA training he had before turning pro.

But sure, if we want we can count Demetrius Johnson as a wrestler, although he really was not much of one (top 3 in Kentucky State - thats really not that great, it says more that he was just a great athlete more than anything). GSP though is a massive stretch.



Anyway, it is a minor point as most of the guys you cited turned pro in the 2000s when there wasn't much MMA infrastructure at all. Anderson Silva turned pro in 1997, so of course he did not start with MMA. But just felt like contesting that GSP really shouldn't be an example of how training in a martial art before going into MMA is evidence of how much more effective it is than just training MMA from the start.
IMO Van is not particularly elite. Fly W is shallow and has always been shallow. Van is one of my faves, cuz he is exciting and has guts but he got lucky vs Pantoja.

He is easily a top ten flyweight and is not in his prime yet. Whether he loses to Pantoja or not doesn't say anything other than Pantoja is an all time great.



Here are the top BW
Yan- base/elite at boxing
Merab- base/elite at wrestling
Sandhagen- base/ elite at kickboxing
Omalley- same as sandhagen though he went to mma sooner. Maybe he fits the mma from the start category
Umar - base / elite wrestler
Umar's base is Muay Thai, and he is not elite at either Muay Thai or wrestling. I'm not sure what ya mean by elite in general, because none of those guys were elite at their sports, though some of them have some amateur credentials.

I think you're greatly overlooking how common it is for guys to not have any serious background in another sport today. Here is the top 16 bantamweights, I will bold every single one who either started with MMA, started cross training right away, or started MMA with in a year or so after their "base".

  • Petr Yan
  • Merab Dvalishvili
  • Umar Nurmagomedov
  • Sean O'Malley
  • Cory Sandhagen
  • Song Yadong
  • Aiemann Zahabi
  • Deiveson Figueiredo
  • Mario Bautista
  • Marlon Vera
  • David Martínez
  • Payton Talbott* (just did high school wrestling and couldn't place in a weak state)
  • Vinicius Oliveira
  • Rob Font
  • Kyler Phillips
BW is the most competitive division in the world, and probably the UFC also. You're not required to start in a martial art before cross training or switching into MMA.


From the past I can only think of Rory Mcdonald.

The reason why you can only think of Rory MacDonald is because he was specifically marketed as someone learning MMA from the ground up. It was a novelty back then. It's not a novelty anymore, so no one is going to do that. No one is going to say some guys base is MMA, so it is easy to overlook how many people started with cross training and not specializing.

Dustin Poirier is someone who is around Rory's age who started with MMA more or less. Though of course in the 2000s it was not common to start with MMA, there were not that many gyms yet.
Now if you go up in weight classes like MW, LHW, HW there are more top guys currently who fit in the mold of not elite at anything/trained mma early instead of becoming elite at 1 discipline... and those weight classes are all trash
I actually think it is the opposite. Usually the bigger weight classes have specialist because they are so lacking in skill, that a specialist can just get past their lack of defenses.

The lower weight classes people are significantly better trained and more well rounded. They tend to have crossed into MMA much earlier in their martial arts career, or just started with MMA in general.
 
If you ask me its a sign of the times

MMA was booming in early 2000s with all these different organizations. Now you see them in BKFC. The new crop of talent os smaller. And ufc has no patience, interest, of bringing in new people

HW is the oldest division of fighters but they are all gone. Sylvia, Couture, Cro Cop, Nog, Gonzaga, Schaub (lol), Carwin, JDS, Cain, Stipe, Werdum, Duffee. Christ almighty the list goes on and on

Maybe LHW should be the heaviest division in UFC o_o
 
Also Hokit will run shit. I see him beating Waldo or Gane. I think hed beat Clark Gable too if he makes his way in

Tom... Just needs to get back in there somehow someday. And prove himself again
 
Waldo Acosta is top 5 HW.

He barely scraped by super old super shop worn Arlovski.

You morons who claim the newer generation is always better are hilarious.

What do you think a peak Arlovski would've done to where's Waldo?

If you think Gane, Tom or any other current HW would come close to being top 3 (much less Waldo a top 5) at any time from 2003-2015, I want what your smoking.

Werdum, Cain, JDS, Barnett, Carwin, Brock, Fedor, Nog, Crocop, Tim, Arlovski, Reem all destroy today's HW with ease.

Heck even Rothwell, Nelson, Big Cat, Crazy Horse or Gonzaga would be top 3 today

Fighters get better. Waldo could lose to some but definitely KO some too. He's dangerously underrated and don't be surprised if he KOs Gane for the belt. Good counter punching and reflex for a HW
 
I disagree. Guys who started in MMA being ranked today is a product of most guys starting MMA.
Whenever there is someone who is elite at 1 thing and decent at a 2nd thing they standout. (IE. Khabib, Islam, Poatan, Gane, Borz) Almost all the very best in every era are exceptional at, at least 1. Then there are those who are elite at 2 or 3.

Right now .ost guys are mediocre at everything.

The caveat is there are some who are not seemingly elite at 1 particular thing but they have exceptional fight IQ, footwork, etc... those guys rise too but there is less of them and they are a tier below the ones who are elite at 1 or 2 disciplines

^^^This is correct. No one likes to say this or admit it, but here's the truth...MMA is one of the easiest sports to be a world champion in. The talent pool is shallow (no matter the divisions) compared to most other major sports, rankings don't necessarily mean you'll have to compete against the best fighters in your division, and because there are a ton of ways to win (randomness of MMA), you can get away with a lot of things you couldn't in other sports like lack of physical conditioning, game planning, etc. Add to that, you can get thrown into a title shot without ever having earned one. That almost never happens in other sports.

MMA also doesn't have an Olympic training center or equivalent, and a lot of fighters dont even have a legit physical conditioning routine, nor do they even eat right. This changes once some of them get money from the UFC, but the fact they could get to that level without doing the proper steps in the first place says it all. That stuff wouldnt happen in a real high level sport like wrestling, Judo, soccer, boxing, football, or track. Most MMA coaches themselves were never high level athletes in a particular sport besides maybe BJJ, which itself has a lot of the same issues I'm stating above (plus tons of PED useage).

That's why when you get fighters who went through a high level Olympic process for a particular sport like Cormier, Merab, Ronda, Kayla Harrison, Cejudo, or some connection to it (Khabib and the Dagaestanis have a big connection to Olympic Judo/wrestling), it's a different level of athlete and they usually end up being very dominant. The tier under that would be guys who weren't Olympic level, but were clearly talented enough to get that far if they tried and still got tons of experience in a single sport (ex: Jon Jones with wrestling, Fedor with Judo, etc.). Then you have the freak athletes who never competed, but probably could have done well if they did in those sports (GSP), followed by the generalist MMA fighters.

I'm not saying that's always the case (GSP is a good example), but if the incentives and money were there in MMA for true high level freak athletes to cross over from other combat sports like Judo, boxing, or wrestling, or even football, you'd see way less of these guys who just started out doing MMA being ranked as top fighters and getting away with just being mediocre at a couple things vs. world class at a ton of things.

TLDR: MMA doesn't necessarily require talent, athleticism, diet, or good training to be a champ, which would never happen in another legit sport with a regular talent pool of competitors.
 
Back
Top