Not good at all, his sole advantage in all fights was his size. Once true skillz & cage IQ took over in mma his size became useless.
I doubt he would have lost easily, he was beating Nog's balls off before he made a huge mistake and went to the ground with him.
From what I've gathered, people generally didn't like him because he had aspirations to fight Fedor and claimed to be better (which Fedor eventually proved false and Sylvia humbly and respectfully accepted upon defeat) and because he was just a big guy that used his reach to his advantage, sometimes winning fights that weren't particularly eventful. To my knowledge, he never did anything too dickish -- sure he wore his belt a lot in public, but no more than many other champs did. Furthermore, he had a very difficult upbringing -- he got abused by his own family and bullied a lot; he was quite the success story in making something of his life from nothing.
Your "point" is simpleton as fuck dude. Pretty lame that you actually believe it even qualifies as "a point" lol
size makes a difference, see ngannou stipeNot good at all, his sole advantage in all fights was his size. Once true skillz & cage IQ took over in mma his size became useless.
Go eat a dick friend...
Being big is part of being a good fighter, and it always has been in unarmed combat. Same for being strong or fast or agile. Physical attributes matter.
Sylvia was good enough to win and defend the UFC title. Why he was good enough (size vs skill) isn't as important as his results -- he became champ.
size makes a difference, see ngannou stipe
Another point made by this brilliant shertard
EseeeEat two dicks b!tch...