- Joined
- Apr 14, 2024
- Messages
- 2,153
- Reaction score
- 4,914
You are being extremely dismissive where you want and over inflating the value of what suits your perspective. Stipe beat DC twice not just once. Stipe's run I mentioned you dismissed yet Fedor never had a string of CONSECUTIVE opponents and you never answered that fact. We seem to have very different perspectives and I feel we should just agree to disagree. I am not really that invested in the matter.
I'm not being dismissive. Its just that I understand the difference between beating an all time great HW when they're at their best and in their 20s and beating an all time great HW when they're 40 years old and well past their prime.
Fedor had 23 fights in his first 4 years and became world champion by beating an all time great HW twice when he was in his 20s and at his best and out classing everyone else who was a contender. That's how many fights Stipe has in 14 years! Stipe was getting knocked out by Stefan Struve 3 years into is career.
After Fedor became the HW champion he won his next consecutive 18 fights. In those 18 fights he beat Big Nog, Mirko, Arlovski when they were at their absolute peaks and in their 20s. He also beat peak momentum Randleman who was coming off a KO win over Mirko in that 18 fight span. Not to mention he also beat guys like Sylvia and Hunt in that span and also Mark Coleman who got a fight with Fedor because he had just beaten top 5 P4P Shogun.
Stipe beat a 39 year old Werdum who went 4-5 in his next 9 fights and the average age of his next 10 opponents was damn near 40 years old.
You'd have to be so biased and dismissive to not understand the significance of this.
Stipe is still an all time great. His list of wins still looks amazing and has good wins on it but only a UFC fanboy would say his body of work was superior to Fedors. It's almost like beating fighters in their prime means nothing.
Last edited: