- Joined
- Feb 9, 2014
- Messages
- 2,690
- Reaction score
- 112
Because
Just last week there was huge outrage over Mackenzie Dern getting ranked after missing weight, so they took her off the rankings.
But now Till has moved up 6 spots in the rankings, even leapfrogging a guy in Covington who is fighting for the interim title, and nobody bats an eye.
What's the diff?
As far as I know, the state athletic commission in Nevada will sanction a contest up to one pound over unless it is for a title in which the contestant must be on weight. We all know this.
This makes me wonder how the rules are in england. If this contest were still agreed on in Nevada then I would assume that it would be treated as a catch weight and therefore should have no effect on rankings in an established weight class if the company were taking that ruling into consideration.
If the company adjusts rankings on fights that are not taking place in the weight class listed then in my opinion they are rewarding bad behavior which makes the company seem unprofessional. I know that sometimes there are valid reasons for missing weight but at the end of the day, they still missed weight and the other fighter did not. They compensate the fighter who did make weight but the rankings should not change from the result of fight that takes place outside of a weight class.
This should be applied to everyone in my opinion. But we all know that some people can throw dolly's threw bus windows and others can't turn down a fight or two. I guess the commission is only respected to a point and the rankings are worthless.