- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
- Messages
- 9,543
- Reaction score
- 6,358
Condit outstruck Lawler every round of there title fight and still lost a decision.
Ohh good one. How could I forget? Added it thanks.
Lawler Condit appears to be the runner up.
Condit outstruck Lawler every round of there title fight and still lost a decision.
Tells people that fans and media don't know how to score fights, goes on to make up his own scoring criteria to tell people why he's right lolIt's because fans and media dont know how fights are scored:
- not all rounds are equal; the later the round, the more points the winner of said round earns. Rounds 4+5 are enough to win the fight because those two are worth more than the first 3 rounds.
- to take the belt you gave to Decisively beat the Champ! Even a close decision in the challenger's favor isnt enough to win the fight. If Reyes was champ and Jones was the challenger Reyes would have won.
- the fighter advancing position and walking forward always wins.
Rampage/Forrest still the biggest robbery
That's actually a fight where the quality of the strikes far outweighed the quantity of strikes.Condit outstruck Lawler every round of there title fight and still lost a decision.
Dude, there are witnesses of judges not even watching some of the fights last night. They're about as credible as a mentally disabled monkey right now.Well ppl fucking hate Jones.
And most of the ppl in those polls aren't judges, actually 100% of them arent.
Jones won LOL
cry more
Tells people that fans and media don't know how to score fights, goes on to make up his own scoring criteria to tell people why he's right lol
Each round is scored separately. If you lose 1,2, and 3 by 10-9 and you win 4 and 5 by 10-9, you lose 48-47. Judges don't go back and change a round because you won the 4th or 5th.
To take the belt, you have to beat the champion by finish or decision, it doesn't matter if it's by an inch or a mile.
The fighter that's advancing position and walking forward doesn't always win because those are secondary criteria in the scoring of a fight.
Here is the idiot:
And Sanchez beat Pearson. Judges never get it wrong, or at least not when your favourite wins.Call me an idiot all you want, but Jones defeated Reyes via UNANIMOUS decision. All your hysterical crying and shit-posting won't change that. Jones is still the champion and has broken GSP's record. You lose.
Hmmm...Dude, there are witnesses of judges not even watching some of the fights last night. They're about as credible as a mentally disabled monkey right now.
And Sanchez beat Pearson. Judges never get it wrong, or at least not when your favourite wins.
Edit: btw I have to call you an idiot again and will do every time I respond to you from now on.
I'm honestly curious to see if someone can find a bigger robbery than that sanchez vs pearson fight I posted a few comments ago. Games on boys.
I'm honestly curious to see if someone can find a bigger robbery than that sanchez vs pearson fight I posted a few comments ago. Games on boys.