- Joined
- Dec 18, 2016
- Messages
- 3,611
- Reaction score
- 1
The definition of history revisionist is adding or omitting details from history kid.
Conor McGregor had the flu when he fought Mendes and it affect his performance. If you leave that out, you're a revisionist piece of shit. The reality is healthy McGregor would have smashed Mendes worse than he did Alvarez. His fight against Mendes literally means NOTHING, except that he can still beat a wrestler when he has the flu.
Whereas Kabob boy couldn't finish a LW outside the top 5 that took the fight on short notice.
Whether he had the flu or not cannot be confirmed certainly not by someone like you who has no fucking idea about what he's talking about. Ranting about revising history is really reaching here bordering on trolling I don't care if he had AIDS when he fought Mendes if you're using that as an excuse to why he got taken down and controlled then you're simply a fucking fool.
Just shut the fuck up kid Mcgregor got taken down by both Denis Siver and Nate Diaz too did he have the flu then as well? HAHA go brainstorm some excuses you'll make when Khabib makes Conor his girlfriend. If Mendes had more than 2 weeks notice in that fight he also wouldn't have gassed out and would have dominated Conor the same way each and every round.
Last edited: