Had Bisping fougth Romero as he should have and likely loose

[BowserJr]

Dude, the fact he took elite wrestlers - bigger and/or in the juice - as Sonnen, Evans or Hammill to controversial decisions shows he can indeed defend wrestling. No legitimate pundit, or the aforementioned opponents, nor GSP, would say Bisping "can't defend wrestling". He can win or lose, but its certainly a tough out.
So who says it? Typical sherbros. And here you are, mate

Dude, the fact he took elite wrestlers - bigger and/or in the juice - as Sonnen, Evans or Hammill to controversial decisions shows he can indeed defend wrestling. No legitimate pundit, or the aforementioned opponents, nor GSP, would say Bisping "can't defend wrestling". He can win or lose, but its certainly a tough out.
So who says it? Typical sherbros. And here you are, mate

He lost to every wrestler he faced. How much more proof do you want?

 

[pankrat]

He lost to every wrestler he faced. How much more proof do you want?

False again. Keep going sherbro.

 

[alex21cms]

Well, I could say that your bias against GSP clouds your view as well, but instead, let me explain further.
At the time Hendricks fought GSP, he was at the very peak of his career.
He used his wrestling (more than Romero), he had KO Power (as much as Romero) and let us not forget that he did not gas (remember stool gate?) That was about that time, on a 3 rounds fight while we can say he arguably won against GSP on a 5 rounds fight! Romero would have had a heart attack!!!
But more importantly, Hendricks was aggressive while Romero liked to play possum. That gameplan would have helped GSP, since he would be happy to throw jabs for 5 rounds without opening up.
Let us also not forget that while Romero is dangerous, at that time he was still decisioning Brad Tavares.

And while you are correct about GSP's mistakes, all they have in common is that his losses were what caused him to be more careful, take no risks and follow his game plan. Which he did and that's why he didn't lose after Serra.
As for being hittable, it would be quite a feat if no one would touch him...especially since he went 5 rounds decisions time and again... so it is quite dishonest to even hint an expectation for him not to get hit at all.
The fact is: he did not open up and took any risks.
He kept to his gameplan and won expected decisions (which, if memory serves me right, is actually one of the main complaints about him).

the minute you said Hendricks had as mutch ko power as Romero your literally out of your mind mate look at both their figths with Costa

 

[Shaddows]

the minute you said Hendricks had as mutch ko power as Romero your literally out of your mind mate look at both their figths with Costa

the meaning is: both have KO power.
And if you disagree with that, then I know you are just nitpicking without reading the whole post.

 

[BowserJr]

False again. Keep going sherbro.

Really Bisping, what wrestler have you beaten?
Are you counting his rigged win against Hammill where Hammill dominated him pillar to post?

Bisping got mostly favorable matches his whole UFC career. Faced only like 3 wrestlers and ducked everyone dangerous

 

[pankrat]

Really Bisping, what wrestler have you beaten?
Are you counting his rigged win against Hammill where Hammill dominated him pillar to post?

Bisping got mostly favorable matches his whole UFC career. Faced only like 3 wrestlers and ducked everyone dangerous

Those 3 wrestlers include some of the very best wrestlers in upper divisions from that era, arguably all-time. Bisping had a legit W over them and odds would give him at least a decent chance vs any other wrestler at the time for the same reason.
I know Mr. Simpleton can't grasp it, he can only ask me to point names on his fight finder. Clasic shertard. Dollaway was a standout wrestler btw, apart from the aforementioned.

Bisping was never truly the best in the world and his wrestling might fall short just like his striking can, actually most of his losses came from being exposed in the feet, which doesnt mean he can't handle strikers, he still is/was top10 material in terms of handling strikers or dudes trying to take him down. Get a grip Mr. Simpleton, sad to read a 2006 account just parroting classic shertard memes and cliches

 

[BowserJr]

Those 3 wrestlers include some of the very best wrestlers in upper divisions from that era, arguably all-time in their respective divisions. Bisping had a legit W over them and odds would give him at least a decent chance vs any wrestler at the time. I know Mr. Simpleton can't grasp it, he can only ask me to point names on his fight finder. Clasic shertard. Dollaway was a standout wrestler btw, apart from the aforementioned.

Bisping's wrestling might fall short just like his striking can, as was exposed on the feet several times, actually most of his losses came that way. He just never truly was the best in the world.
It doesnt mean he can handle strikers though, stil is/was top10 material, in terms of handling strikers or dudes trying to take him down. Get a grip Mr. Simpleton, sad to read a 2006 account just parroting classic shertard memes and cliches

You're right he was never the best. He lost to all the top guys and some who weren't. Dolloway was a decent gate keeper. Maybe he had a decent wrestling pedigree but he was never able to use it against any legit guys in MMA so your example is weak as fuck.

None of what you said refutes what I said in my original post that you replied.

Now go on and keep posting to get your post count up, friend.

 

[pankrat]

You're right he was never the best. He lost to all the top guys and some who weren't. Dolloway was a decent gate keeper. Maybe he had a decent wrestling pedigree but he was never able to use it against any legit guys in MMA so your example is weak as fuck.

None of what you said refutes what I said in my original post that you replied.

Now go on and keep posting to get your post count up, friend.

Its me replying to you saying that Bisping "cant defend wrestling". If I quoted that exact post or you typed it in another one in the same thread who the fuck cares, are you a bitch in top of an utter simpleton?

Based on how Biping handled the legit wrestlers he faced he would have a solid chance to defend his top10 spot vs any other wrestler at the time at MW.
As a matter of fact, Bisping lost more fights via striking than via wrestling.

You Mr. Simpleton can grasp it or not, but Bisping was widely considered by fellow fighters and pundits as a hard guy to wrestle down. If you dont know and fight finder doesnt telll you its your issue

 

[BowserJr]

Its me replying to you saying that Bisping "cant defend wrestling". If I quoted that exact post or you typed it in another one in the same thread who the fuck cares, are you a bitch in top of an utter simpleton?

Again get it right, based on how he handled the legit wrestlers he faced he would have a solid chance to defend his top10 spot vs any other wrestler at the time at MW.
Bisping lost more fights va striking than via wrestling.

You Mr. Simpleton can grasp it or not, but Bisping was widely considered by fellow fighters and pundits as a hard guy to wrestle down. If you dont know and fight finder doesnt telll you its your issue

Get it right you Bisping cum guzzler.

You responded to me listing all the guys he'd lose to. None of what you said refutes that

He lost to every decent wrestler including two WW. None of what you said refutes that

Clearly it makes you feel better to type Mr. Simpleton so keep doing it. Lol so sad

 

[pankrat]

Get it right you Bisping cum guzzler.

You responded to me listing all the guys he'd lose to. None of what you said refutes that

He lost to every decent wrestler including two WW. None of what you said refutes that

Clearly it makes you feel better to type Mr. Simpleton so keep doing it. Lol so sad

Which is sad is having 15 years in a mmaforum and 6k uneducated, simpleton posts.
Fight finder BS is all you have
Bisping's striking did cost him more losses than his TDD. You claim Bisping "can't defend wrestling". Call it simpleton or moron its what it is.

Name who are those wrestlers at MW who Bisping allegedly "ducked" who would be favoured to take Bisping top10 spot. Nobody outside of rabid GSP fanboys on sherog acknowledged Bisping a the best in the division, he was legitimate top10-5 MW with solid TDD and scrambling, cardio and stirking fundamentals.

Simpleton shertard. Makes me feel better to type it out, keep in mind im well aware that im wasting my time in a forum discussing with Mr.Simpleton in the first place and now you know too

 

[BowserJr]

Which is sad is having 15 years in a mmaforum and 6k uneducated, simpleton posts.
Fight finder BS is all you have
Bisping's striking did cost him more losses than his TDD. You claim Bisping "can't defend wrestling". Call it simpleton or moron its what it is.

Name who are those wrestlers at MW who Bisping allegedly "ducked" who would be favoured to take Bisping top10 spot. Nobody outside of rabid GSP fanboys on sherog acknowledged Bisping a the best in the division, he was legitimate top10-5 MW with solid TDD and scrambling, cardio and stirking fundamentals.

Simpleton shertard. Makes me feel better to type it out, keep in mind im well aware that im wasting my time in a forum discussing with Mr.Simpleton in the first place and now you know too

Are you Bispings son?

You have very poor reading comprehension and can't even follow your own train of though.

Absolutely pathetic lol

Sorry your father isn't as good as you thought he was

 

[pankrat]

Are you Bispings son?

You have very poor reading comprehension and can't even follow your own train of though.

Absolutely pathetic lol

Sorry your father isn't as good as you thought he was

Im not even saying he was that good. He didnt even manage to get a tittle shot during the long Silva's reign in the MW division, despite UFC being interested on promoting him.

It wasnt the wrestling what set him back most of the times he lost at MW though, as you say like a fucking moron, like a textbook shertard. He got clobbered in the feet, that's what happened to him.

Imagine having a 2006 account and being this dense, getting slapped in your own native language LOL.

 

[BowserJr]

Im not even saying he was that good. He didnt even manage to get a tittle shot during the long Silva's reign in the MW division, despite UFC being interested on promoting him.

It wasnt the wrestling what set him back most of the times he lost at MW though, as you say like a fucking moron, like a textbook shertard. He got clobbered in the feet, that's what happened to him.

Imagine having a 2006 account and being this dense, getting slapped in your own native language LOL.

Imagine being a massive fucking self absorbed retard that you're blind to your own mental derangement and ineptitude. You keep going on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on trying to discredit what I said about your father's weak wrestling when thats not even the point of my original post which you replied to. I never even directly said that. Your panties are so far up your ass just cuz I refuted what you said about the sonnen fight with stats and facts. They're so far up your ass that it's clearly impairing your brains ability to get oxygen. You're literally stuck on your daddy's wrestling ability so badly that you can't even follow the conversation

I guess it's a sore spot for you. Maybe your daddy should've trained UFC a little more

Since you're brain is too smooth to follow along here is where your pants went up your ass

BowserJr said: ↑
Most sites had sonnen winning

I dont like it but the scoring favors LnP. Even if it doesn't the numbers have sonnen winning too

Pussykrat said
Cool but some us saw the fight. An official judge, plenty of fans and media, as well as Sonnen the wrestler himself, thought Bisping won.
Saying Bisping can't defend wrestling as you say...just typical shertard.

As any moron can see I didn't say he can't defend wrestling. I said he lost via LnP and too be more exact also via wall n stall. It's a shitty scoring system. Get over it. That's how most fights are scored. There was no controversy in his losses to wrestlers. It's only his wins that are controversial. The fact of the matter is he lost to any opponent who has good wrestling centered offense and a bunch who are better strikers than him which is his bread and butter.

Go shine your daddy's fake eye before you get ass raped again

 

[pankrat]

I
As any moron can see I didn't say he can't defend wrestling.

Plus Bisping has no defense against the wrestling

No surprise, a bitch in top of a textbook shertard, I called it before.

Dont get mad and get it right: odds would favour Bisping to beat most "wrestling centered offense" MWs during his era and allegedly the best one today, Brunson, would not be favoured to replicate what he dd to Till.
No MW today would be favoured to employ a "wrestling centered offense" and succeed outside of maybe Khamzat.
A handful of them would be favoured to beat him using a "striking centered offense" though.

You have your shertard cliches, your fight finder analisis splitting hairs, and that's all you got, since 2006.

 

[BowserJr]

No surprise, a bitch in top of a textbook shertard, I called it before.

Dont get mad and get it right: odds would favour Bisping to beat most "wrestling centered offense" MWs during his era and allegedly the best one today, Brunson, would not be favoured to replicate what he dd to Till.
No MW today would be favoured to employ a "wrestling centered offense" and succeed outside of maybe Khamzat.
A handful of them would be favoured to beat him using a "striking centered offense" though.

You have your shertard cliches, your fight finder analisis splitting hairs, and that's all you got, since 2006.

Bahahahahahaha grasping at fucking straws like dick tucking bitch. You had to look for replies to other people
<Lmaoo>

To address his wrestling, like I've said 5000 times already. He lost to any guy with decent wrestling offense

What a weak goal post shifting pussy hahahaha

Now be a good little bitch and keep replying

 

[pankrat]

Bahahahahahaha grasping at fucking straws like dick tucking bitch. You had to look for replies to other people
<Lmaoo>

To address his wrestling, like I've said 5000 times already. He lost to any guy with decent wrestling offense

What a weak goal post shifting pussy hahahaha

Now be a good little bitch and keep replying

Dont get mad darling.

As any moron can see I didn't say he can't defend wrestling.

....

Bisping has no defense against the wrestling

Just shut the fuck up.

Bisping got beat by striking way more frequently and emphatically than by wrestling.
Odds would give a better chance to Bisping losing by strikes than by wrestling vs top10 MWs back then, let alone today. Get this right, you monumental moron.

Bisping was a solid anti-grappler, even the best of them had a rought time implementing a wrestling centered offense.
He was not enough of a threat with strikes or takedowns to keep elite strikers at bay, and that way came 80% of his losses

Shertard clichés and utter simpeton arguments around fight finder only to get slapped and cry like a battered wife. Thats all you got. since 2006

 

[michi972]

No, terrible matchup for GSP.

I’m a big GSP fan but Ping was the weakest male champ since Serra.

Imo he was way better champ than Alvarez

 

[Koro_11]

Imo he was way better champ than Alvarez

No, Alvarez was widely regarded as one of the best 155ers even before coming to the UFC.

Bisping was a jobber who made his living off fighting cans and when he fouled out and won a belt he avoided the entire top 15, called out 45 year old Hendo of all people.

 

[BowserJr]

Dont get mad darling.

That's right my little bitch do as your told.

Keep replying to me with your weak ass shit that I've already destroyed 100x

....





Just shut the fuck up.

Bisping got beat by striking way more frequently and emphatically than by wrestling.
Odds would give a better chance to Bisping losing by strikes than by wrestling vs top10 MWs back then, let alone today. Get this right, you monumental moron.

Bisping was a solid anti-grappler, even the best of them had a rought time implementing a wrestling centered offense.
He was not enough of a threat with strikes or takedowns to keep elite strikers at bay, and that way came 80% of his losses

Shertard clichés and utter simpeton arguments around fight finder only to get slapped and cry like a battered wife. Thats all you got. since 2006