- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
- Messages
- 33,630
- Reaction score
- 25,341
Again, choking seems like something that is generally going to be considered deadly force but it's unclear how that state makes the distinction (if they do).I've been making the argument that there is always the chance of getting badly injured or worse in a fight. I never denied you could die from a choke, you retard <45>
Now, about those questions I asked (you avoided the second part of the first one, again)
1. Is a RNC always considered deadly force or do we have to take into consideration things like context/intent? Also, if you do always consider it deadly force, is it unreasonable force seeing as it's an unarmed man grappling another unarmed, yet threatening, person?
2. Do you actually think this self-defense incident is vigilantism?
3. Considering they let go once he stopped moving and stopped responding to their questions, what cue do you think they ignored or should have noticed before the point they let him go?
Ok so how exactly was the choke misapplied? Surely a choke that kills someone, eh, unintentionally is being misapplied. So if it wasn't held too long, then what was it? How exactly do you kill someone with a choke if you only hold it as long as needed?