- Joined
- May 1, 2011
- Messages
- 3,817
- Reaction score
- 3,025
Why in the world would anyone favor a guy that has fought nothing but cans over a guy with good wins on his record?
Kamzat's record is more padded then the bra you walk around in.
oh and Holland did recently KO the guy who will likely get KO of the year himself.
View attachment 822460



Why in the world would anyone favor a guy that has fought nothing but cans over a guy with good wins on his record?
When Khamzat splatters Leon Edwards you too will see the light.Keep lining up the Kans for Kamzat
![]()
While Holland continues to defeat contenders..
Why in the world would anyone favor a guy that has fought nothing but cans over a guy with good wins on his record?
I see you love bbc.![]()
OR
![]()
This is your chance to choose a side between these two up and coming potential Superstars!
I got Holland all day.
don't be scared homies...
inb4 Kanzmat gets cage humped for 5 rounds.. <45>When Khamzat splatters Leon Edwards you too will see the light.
Beating Buckley and getting finished by Brendan Allen = next GOAT prospect
Your emotions are getting in the way of logic woman.
![]()



You’re kinda proving my point. Khamzat could go on to be the greatest fighter to have ever lived, but right now he has beat absolutely no one to deserve that hype. There is zero reason to favor him over Holland at this point in time.They are not in the same point of their careers, 9 fights vs 26
All the champions have fought cans in the beginning
Why, because he’s 10-1? I just looked him up, and he’s fought even more nobodies than Khamzat has.Aliskerov isn't a can.
LmaoKeep lining up the Kans for Kamzat
![]()
While Holland continues to defeat contenders..