There’s a difference between what people can do and what they will do. The more time passes the less nuance there will be. People are just going to check the records, not the entire history and context of the fights.You're missing the point it's completely up to you. I look at Baraos defenses against Faber, Windland and mcdonald as real defenses. No reason not to. I look at toms win against blaydes as a legitimate title defense. Not interested in what others say.
Aljo has the most defenses at BW, but no one holds him in too high of a regard, because TJ had one arm, Cejudo was off the couch, Yan was a DQ followed by a Lay and pray. We can look at fights and apply context.
Let them be uneducated, you can always tell yourself you know betterThere’s a difference between what people can do and what they will do. The more time passes the less nuance there will be. People are just going to check the records, not the entire history and context of the fights.
*shouldAhh so you're not saying it's on him, but on the UFC. Fair enough. Except...you claimed he was pouting sitting on the sidelines etc when the reality is he said he'd fight someone else and the UFC shot it down. So maybe don't act like he's had the chance to smash the division. (Even though there's only 2 other guys left out of the top 10 for him to smash anyway.)
*should
Both fights I want to see.The only top HWs that Tommy hasn't starched are Gane who ducked him multiple times, and Jailton.
Me too, when he has the undisputed title, so that he hasn't cleared out the division beforehand.Both fights I want to see.
could *should also apply to the UFC? hmmmm. it's like both thoughts can be true or something. wild. crazy even. big.Yes. "Should" implies that Aspinall has control over the situation if the word is directed at him. He doesn't decide the matchups. He's stated he's open to fighting other people and done it publicly.
I'm questioning whether you know what "should" means.
could *should also apply to the UFC? hmmmm. it's like both thoughts can be true or something. wild. crazy even. big.
Your tone was quite obviously directed at Aspinall "whining and drinking protein shakes" or whatever. As if he has any say at all in what's happening.
What I want to know is, why aren't we doing Aspinall vs Gane? Is it Aspinall that doesn't want it? I've heard Gane also doesn't want to fight Aspinall? And I've heard the UFC doesn't want to do it, because they don't want to risk Jones vs Aspinall later this year?
Because I agree with GSP. Tom should just fight Cyril Gane, defend his interim title, make himself 100% undeniable, and start publicly calling out the real problem: Dana White.
Exactly. But I don't think there needs to be a rematch vs Ankalaev though. I'd like for Jiri to have a go. Poatan filled his role in 205 and defended his belt 3x and had a close fight vs Ankalaev in which Ankalalev was ever so slightly better. Alex had already spoken about wanting to move up to HW, and he has said he would like to fight Aspinall or JJ and said he thinks he can win against both, but sees Jon Jones as the hardest fight ever, saying for whatever match at HW, he'd need to be in a really good shape, locked in totally.GSP was in a mirror situation to Jones.
He dodged Woodley to fight Bisping, which was the easier fight against the more weathered opponent.
Whittaker was next, and GSP chose to retire instead.
But, the thing is, if you've already competed against the best for 10-15+ years, you've already accomplished everything there is to accomplish, what else do you really have to prove?
Would GSP or Jones gain anything if they'd fought Whittaker and aspinall? It would be a great feather in the cap at the end of a storied career, but it wouldn't really change the bottom line in terms of legacy and all time status.
Much as we want the fight, I think people need to understand such a situation from the perspective of a top fighter at the end of their career.
With that in mind, where this situation does change is money. Jones is in a position where he doesn't have to fight again. If the UFC wants it, they'll bend the rules to make it happen, if not, then he's out.
Which is a great position to be in terms of leverage, especially in a star deprived ufc.
That being said, I think it happens.
Probably depends on who wins the poatan magomedov rematch. If poatan wins, I could see Jones giving up the title and moving down.
5 years removed? You mean 3, right? Because he fought Ngannou in 2021 and JJ, in 2024. Last I checked, 2021~2024 is 3 years.Sure doesn't look like Jones wants to fight to me.
Stipe was 5 years removed, did not have a single win over a current HW and refused to get involved in either interm title match. Would you have preferred GSP stuck around to fight Rich Franklin instead of Whittaker?