- Joined
- Sep 1, 2005
- Messages
- 24,379
- Reaction score
- 3,475
You must have mistaken me for someone else.
Im far too tight to go out to an establishment where these 'ho's' you describe are dancing around poles.
You must have mistaken me for someone else.
Im far too tight to go out to an establishment where these 'ho's' you describe are dancing around poles.
your general premise is fine that objectifying kids in a sexual way is atrocious, course. But you're just being a whacko using other wacko's opinions about that poor Desmond kid to go after the left in general. 99.9% of people feel the way you and I do, period, across all political persuasions. This caricature of the left that somehow implies a majority are ok with treating kids like this is just plain wrong.If Desmond the cross dressing kid and some 9 year can come out to Mayor Pete and it is celebrated why is this an issue? All of it is wrong in my book but if you allow the sexualization of children and promote sex changes for kids and throw sex into the face of a everyone why is this case an exception or the one that crosses the line?
It's amazing how 17 becomes a child at times like this.
Now being accused of sexual misconduct 40 years ago when you were 15 with zero evidence to back it up. That's serious stuff.
Surely you understand the difference between the sexual exploitation of a 17 year old, and making "very credible" (according to the Presedient) allegations of sexual assault by a 15 year old. If not, the distinction is one is an entirely innocent victim, the other is suspected of a serious crime.
Imagine letting a child get you this worked up.
What a disgusting vile thing to do.
17 is still very much a child. Just look at her, shes a little kid.
Fuckings need to get weighed in.

This post is kinda gay
Depicting raping teenage girls to trigger the libz.
lol what, what rape depiction ?
you've never had your dick wet have you.
Defending rape depictions of children to trigger the libz.
Yeah, @Trotsky how are you seeing rape in this? Where it was made she's of legal age, and there is nothing in that depiction is showing her being constrained against her will. Her pigtails are being held and that's it...pretty silly of you to just assume rape. I really don't see how anyone could see this and think rape (outside of statutory, but she's of consenting age, so it's not statutory).
The internet is obsessed with this girl and it's pretty silly. Funny little decal but clearly in bad taste and it's obvious the company didn't create this themselves.
Depicting raping teenage girls to trigger the libz.
You really think that's a depiction of Thunberg consenting to sex with right-wing puds?
you sound like a child rapist honestly. Or at least one in the making defending this shit.once again, what rape depiction ??
Is your commi brain fried.
Imagine being otherwise offended by the exploitation of children but finding this laudable as a consequence of Greta's politics.