Ok, I wasnt being 100% honest
Really though my opinion on this subject is a common one.
Based on how he did vs top tier competition durring the golden era of boxing, Id say its Ali at number 1.
Heres something wierd about my pick though, I think Tyson would have KOed Ali.
Ali said in an interview on Arsineo Hall, when asked who he thought would win between the two, that Tyson scared him, and "Im quick, but one punch from this guy and Im(then acted like he was asleep)".
Argue all you want, he would have lost the same way everyone else did in the 80's.
By being scared stiff of Tysons Punching power.
Now, if a much younger Ali disagreed, and was able to use his rediculously good footwork against Tysons flat-footed, str8 forward style. He would win in the 6th by KO
IMO
Lets see if that gets some life back in here.
How Ali acted on the Arsineo show can not be taken seriously. What Tyson said can be. Tyson fought harder hitters than tyson (shavers, foreman, liston) and fighters with a comprable punch (frazier, lyle) and his chin was never found lacking(I think how hurt he was against cooper is over estimated). Ali had everything that gave tyson trouble. Someone he couldn't knock out, height, jab, speed, MENTAL superiority and ring savy. Tyson has very little chance in this fight. I think it is one of his two worst matchups in history, Foreman being the other.
Back in late '63/early '64, Ali scored a whopping 78 on his IQ test for the army, which put him only slightly above the level of being mentally retarded.
Back in late '63/early '64, Ali scored a whopping 78 on his IQ test for the army, which put him only slightly above the level of being mentally retarded.
I would not put too much stock in IQ tests now, let alone tests from the seventies. Intelligence testing is in constant revision and far from being a good indication of a persons ability.
Got a low score, eh?