- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 46,275
- Reaction score
- 13,969
Yep, it all seems kind of futile to me until they are all on a stage together. When you're speaking to donors or hitting media softballs you can say whatever your position is. Once they are all up there going back and forth, that's when the storms will start brewing. I don't think Walker was made for a debate stage, I think Rand will do well off the cuff and Jeb will put out some good soundbytes for moderates. All to be seen though, Kasich joining the party would be fun, I would love to see everyone ripping on Christie for a good 10 minutes.
I agree Walker isn't going to shine in debates. He is very reserved and has had to work hard just to be good with his speeches. I think Rubio gets flack for his SOTU response but everything I've seen him in recently, especially the Koch event with Cruz/Rand, he did very well.
2012 was very boring because it was completely one dimensional. As much as I tried to view separate factions with the field, it really did just become Moderate v. Evangelical/Tea Party/Conservative with Romney always maintaining dominance as the others surged and fizzled. The debates all became putting Romney and the current flavor of the month candidate beside one another and have them argue while the other candidates would make overly ideological promises of abolishing the IRS, Obamacare, Welfare, etc. The 1 in 10 tax cuts for spending said it all.
This year, Santurom/Huckabee (who should be able to cancel each other out) and Cruz/Carson (same occurs here) are the only distractions I see occurring in the debates.