Opinion Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020

name one thing the left doesn't try and smear

they had not just quotes, they had people that work for abortion clinics admitting what they were doing
 
Lmao the editing in that video is like homer on rock bottom.

 
How could Google have stopped GRU hackers from phishing the DNC and laundering the data dumps through Wikileaks? What could they have done to "stop" the undesirable secrets it relayed about Hillary, and certain parties like Donna Brazile who worked towards her benefit?

Why wouldn't they call that the "Russia situation"? Why would she call it the "Trump situation"? Why aren't they talking about how to prevent the "Donna Brazile situation"?

Either people had the good sense to realize those were Russians with the intent to disrupt our democracy, foment division, and hurt Hillary, or they didn't. You can't control how people digest information. You can tell them the truth, as I did, but it doesn't matter. People will make up their own minds according to the information they encounter. Everyone processes according to his own talent and skill.

Google isn't okay with that if it disagrees with them, apparently.

I'd like to see the full video to put it in context but Veritas never just puts out raw footage without a ton of editing. My read of it is that she's referring to the misinformation campaign and social media fuckery and she's talking about the tech industry in general. Obviously I wouldn't have expected them to stop the hacks or leaks. If Trump situation she's referring to is simply Trump getting elected, irrespective of any of the Russia shit, and she thinks google should actively work to prevent his reelection then I'm totally fine with that.

We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.

We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?
 
I like people run in there try to discredit the source ohhh “Project Veritas” then the same people post a CNN, foxnews or NYT as a source lol they all have black marks
 
attack the person, attack the source, repeat
 
It’s time for conservatives to flock to yahoo, altvista and bing lol
 
So what you're saying is Okeefe videotaped a conversation with an acorn employee who agreed to go along with a human trafficking scheme?

No. Spend less time trolling and more time reading sources. No employee went along with Okeefe's human trafficking scheme. Most of them sat there and politely nodded, then immediately contacted the cops about what they had just heard. O'Keefe left that little tidbit out of the expose he shopped around to right wing media outlets. Kinda hard to insinuate that Planned Parenthood was hip to work with you to traffic women in the sex trade, when they were immediately reporting you to the law.

Listen, I know you only pretend to be a black guy on this forum so that you can get away with saying racist shit. That's probably why you missed the following detail:

When this guy shows up in your office:


kJPSrM6vzy3egz9s5
screen_shot_2016-08-03_at_3.45.37_pm.png


and claims to be an international pimp, every single black person in America would immediately call bullshit.
 
Google isn't going to do shit.

It couldn't stop Trump getting elected in 2016 and it won't stop him from getting re-elected in 2020.

Kiss my ass, Google.
 
Naturally the left is writing it off because it's Project Veritas. Totally ignoring the actual Google insiders on video admitting to misbehavior. I won't say that PV has never fumbled the ball, but the leftist myth of them being bad actors is not a good match for reality. They keep exposing left wing scumbaggery and that is the real problem leftists have with them.

Ironic also that they scream so loud about "RUSSIA!!!!1111" subverting our democracy, but are completely fine with social media companies attempting to do the same thing. They didn't seem to mind when Facebook was giving our data to the Obama campaign in order to insure his victory. And they are totally cool with them suppressing conservative voices and promoting the craziest loons on the left.

It just goes to show you that their only real principle is power.
 
Project Veritas.

Have none of you learned?

“In its ruling tonight, the Fifth Circuit not only affirmed the state’s right to terminate its agreement with Planned Parenthood affiliates, but also confirmed that the videos were undoctored. The court noted that an independent forensic firm’s review of the undercover footage found “that the video was authentic and not deceptively edited.” This directly refutes Planned Parenthood’s own false claim.

The ruling also mentioned parts of the video footage in which Planned Parenthood executives had admitted to illegally altering abortion procedures to obtain intact fetuses whose organs could then be sold to medical research firms for greater profit. This included finding ways to circumvent the federal ban on partial-birth abortion, whether by changing the way they performed late-term procedures or by signing a form saying they had not “intended” to retrieve an intact fetus.

Tonight’s decision is a win for the pro-life effort to remove Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid funding at the state level, but it also affirms evidence showing that Planned Parenthood doctors and affiliates did indeed break federal law.”
 
You changed your avy?

Every 7.4 months. Religious requirement.

“In its ruling tonight, the Fifth Circuit not only affirmed the state’s right to terminate its agreement with Planned Parenthood affiliates, but also confirmed that the videos were undoctored. The court noted that an independent forensic firm’s review of the undercover footage found “that the video was authentic and not deceptively edited.” This directly refutes Planned Parenthood’s own false claim.

The ruling also mentioned parts of the video footage in which Planned Parenthood executives had admitted to illegally altering abortion procedures to obtain intact fetuses whose organs could then be sold to medical research firms for greater profit. This included finding ways to circumvent the federal ban on partial-birth abortion, whether by changing the way they performed late-term procedures or by signing a form saying they had not “intended” to retrieve an intact fetus.

Tonight’s decision is a win for the pro-life effort to remove Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid funding at the state level, but it also affirms evidence showing that Planned Parenthood doctors and affiliates did indeed break federal law.”

The videos were of a select planned parenthood employee, and scaled out by O Keefe and Veritas as a normal thing for PP.

Why trust people who have been caught like a dozen times for scams like this? Christ, man.
 
“In its ruling tonight, the Fifth Circuit not only affirmed the state’s right to terminate its agreement with Planned Parenthood affiliates, but also confirmed that the videos were undoctored. The court noted that an independent forensic firm’s review of the undercover footage found “that the video was authentic and not deceptively edited.” This directly refutes Planned Parenthood’s own false claim.

The ruling also mentioned parts of the video footage in which Planned Parenthood executives had admitted to illegally altering abortion procedures to obtain intact fetuses whose organs could then be sold to medical research firms for greater profit. This included finding ways to circumvent the federal ban on partial-birth abortion, whether by changing the way they performed late-term procedures or by signing a form saying they had not “intended” to retrieve an intact fetus.

Tonight’s decision is a win for the pro-life effort to remove Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid funding at the state level, but it also affirms evidence showing that Planned Parenthood doctors and affiliates did indeed break federal law.”

Stop repeating this bullshit. It's been debunked.

The 5th Cir. holding was in regards to authenticating portions of the video as evidence in a civil lawsuit. It was NOT the court endorsing the narrative put out by Veritas, or weighing in on the crux of the litigation, which was that the video amounted to liable for failing to disclose key facts. The dickhead left out pertinent facts, chiefly, that the PP employees in the video had immediately reported him to the police, although for obvious reasons, didn't take his claims of being an international pimp seriously, because he looked like a poster child for the incel movement.

This holding was about whether or not the video could be used by either party as evidence.
 
Back
Top