- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,370
- Reaction score
- 4,448
Found this interesting: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/new...A150kVt?cvid=724949ac9eb14bf8a786fb5be4eeb071
Basically confirming some of what has been said here. Australia is experiencing a higher than normal death rates.
From the article:
"This came after Australia's latest mortality data released in November showed that there had been 128,797 deaths from Jan. 1 to Aug. 31, which was 17% higher than the historical average."
Usually death rates only differentiate a few percentage points, not 17%.
Bry
Yep, that and the fertility data is overwhelming.
Than we have the all cause mortality,
"An enlightening speaker today was Josh Stirling, a highly-recognized insurance research analyst."
https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/...on_id=975571&post_id=89248917&isFreemail=true
"‘The One Chart That Tells the Entire Story’: Analysis Shows 26% Worse Mortality Among the Vaccinated
“The people who are under the age of 50 who took the vaccine now have a 49% higher mortality rate.”"
.
.
"“We've done what we think is really professional work with this. And we think it simplifies down to a conclusion that says that through the last available data set, the people in the UK who took the vaccine have a 26% higher mortality rate. The people who are under the age of 50 who took the vaccine now have a 49% higher mortality rate. And worst of all, the people who only took one dose of the vaccine at approximately 145% worse mortality rate.”"
This isn't the first time this has shown but I never understood it until now.
"“It just doesn’t make a ton of sense unless you realize that what’s going on with this really is that the people who took the dose, the first dose in the United States — that’s about 12% of people — but then stop taking any other doses, those people, through their choice to stop, disproportionately [were] the ones who are harmed,” explained Stirling.
“And so, what we’re concluding is that if you happen to be an unlucky person who was in some fashion, even moderately injured [or] with a minor injury [and] have decided not to continue, the statistics, the best statistics we have show that you’re gonna have, at least through today, maybe it’ll get better … but if that doesn’t happen we’d have to assume that this is now the baseline, there’s going to be 145% higher mortality"
Makes sense, your body was damaged enough to scare you into not taking the drug again. Unfortunately the damage probably accumulates and in some/a lot of cases you're already dead but don't know it. Playing out in all cause mortality because the neurological damage may lead to you to drown or having a fatal car crash.
As shown in Alberta Canadas unknown causes explosion and New Zealands ‘unascertained natural causes’. In Australia i believe we just do a fakie and don't find the root cause i.e. climate change.
https://nzdsos.com/2022/10/12/coroners-amendment-bill-serious-questions/
"A spokesperson for NZDSOS said “it is clear on glancing through the submissions, New Zealanders see this amendment as a cover-up attempt, either by accident or design”."
Obviously I'm a fan of Senator Gerard Rennick and co but they arent alone in speaking out and trying to raise the issue of the criminally injured. To me the very behaviours of the politicians and senior civil servants show known criminality.
https://thenewamerican.com/govt-criminally-ignoring-vax-injured-living-in-hell-on-earth/
"Mr. Fusaro took a Covid injection for a job opportunity that required international travel at a time of tight restrictions, figuring the odds of him not getting injured were on his side. Sadly, he was wrong. After a second Pfizer shot, the man developed numerous medical conditions he had never had before, such as complete heart block, blood clots, and pericarditis, among others. He had three heart surgeries and was put on a pacemaker. Mr. Fusaro’s conditions were medically recognized as having “temporal correlation” with Covid inoculations. "
Last edited: