• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social GoldenWolf's COVID Vaccine/Lockdown Protest megathread Vol. 2

All of the above is just saying "I am not familiar with the term excess deaths".

Look it up. It doesn't matter what some local TV station says someone died of. If you look at the excess death data you can easily see the approximate number of deaths due to COVID. I really hate repeating myself but it seems many ITT need reminding again and again since they keep plonking down the same disingenuous statements over and over again.
 
User name checks out....


https://peterhalligan.substack.com/...n_id=1032096&post_id=86760275&isFreemail=true

"Lancet study of severe outcomes amongst 30 million Brits finds that if you exclude deaths and adverse events within 14 days - you should get more injections"


Mmmm THE science seems to not like being looked at.



"“We excluded events that occurred within the first 14 days after completion of the primary vaccination schedule to allow time for a full immune response to be mounted. For the same reason, the 14-day period after a booster dose was counted as the exposure period after the primary vaccine dose.”

How many deaths might have occurred within that 14 day period? Well, the US VAERS provides a clue for these “spontaneous” deaths.
"

"Eye-balling that bar-chart, maybe 90% of deaths reported to VAERS occur within 14 days. Presumably, hospitalizations that arise within the 14 day period that persist beyond 14 days are included, but those resolved within 14 days are not."


That is the good thing about fraud, nothing matters but what you decide is the truth.
 
User name checks out....


https://peterhalligan.substack.com/...n_id=1032096&post_id=86760275&isFreemail=true

"Lancet study of severe outcomes amongst 30 million Brits finds that if you exclude deaths and adverse events within 14 days - you should get more injections"


Mmmm THE science seems to not like being looked at.



"“We excluded events that occurred within the first 14 days after completion of the primary vaccination schedule to allow time for a full immune response to be mounted. For the same reason, the 14-day period after a booster dose was counted as the exposure period after the primary vaccine dose.”

How many deaths might have occurred within that 14 day period? Well, the US VAERS provides a clue for these “spontaneous” deaths.
"

"Eye-balling that bar-chart, maybe 90% of deaths reported to VAERS occur within 14 days. Presumably, hospitalizations that arise within the 14 day period that persist beyond 14 days are included, but those resolved within 14 days are not."


That is the good thing about fraud, nothing matters but what you decide is the truth.

Didn't you cry and complain when I pointed out the two week window for most injuries lol?
 
All of the above is just saying "I am not familiar with the term excess deaths".

Look it up. It doesn't matter what some local TV station says someone died of. If you look at the excess death data you can easily see the approximate number of deaths due to COVID. I really hate repeating myself but it seems many ITT need reminding again and again since they keep plonking down the same disingenuous statements over and over again.

That's the kicker tho... the excess deaths are not all accountable to covid deaths here in Australia at least.

https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/clinical/why-are-more-people-dying-in-australia-many-questi

The true picture of the excess deaths currently occurring in Australia differs according to which number-cruncher you refer to.

The official source, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), puts it at 16.6% more deaths than expected over the course of 2022 so far, with its figures going until the end of May.

However, the Actuaries Institute, an organisation also built around precision with numbers, has reached a different conclusion.

According to its latest analysis, the rate is closer to 12%, with an estimated 8500 more people dying until the end of May than would normally be expected.


The biggest difference – although not the only one – is the baseline number of deaths each organisation uses as its predicted number. While the ABS uses an average from previous years, the Actuaries Institute makes allowance for mortality trends and demographic changes, thus accounting for much of the gap.

Whichever workings are at play, however, the pattern is obvious: excess mortality is significantly higher this year than normal. So does the difference matter?

Yes it does, according to Karen Cutter, an actuary of more than 25 years who helped compile the latest analysis for the institute’s COVID-19 Mortality Working Group.

For her, one of the key questions to emerge from the analysis – and one of fundamental relevance to general practice – is why the excess non-COVID deaths are occurring. With that in mind, ‘getting it right’ is important, she believes.

The Actuaries Institute analysis estimates that a little more than half the excess deaths until the end of May were due to COVID-19 – with an estimated 4200 people dying ‘from’ the disease – making it likely to be the third largest cause of death in Australia this year. Leaving aside an estimated 1280 people who died ‘with’ COVID, that leaves 3700 other deaths where the background increase is not clear.
( around half the excess deaths even using the more flattering lower number of excess death )

While much remains unknown, there is detail on which diseases seem to have shifted.

According to the institute, deaths from respiratory disease are down this year (around 7%), with cancer mortality sticking close to the expected rate, while deaths from heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes and dementia are all higher.


There's definitely questions to be asked regarding the excess death rates in Australia. Bi product of the lockdowns? Covid itself? The vaccine?

These are logical questions to be asking at this juncture and should be examined in far more detail imo.
 
Last edited:
https://www.actuaries.digital/2022/...-month-of-high-excess-mortality-in-july-2022/

In summary:

  • Total excess mortality for the month of July 2022 is estimated at 16% (+2,600 deaths), relative to expected mortality at pre-pandemic levels.

  • Total excess mortality for the first seven months of 2022 is 14% (+13,700 deaths).

  • Around half of the excess mortality for the first seven months of 2022 is due to COVID-19 (+7,100 deaths) with remaining excess of +6,600 due to the remaining causes.

  • October 2022 has the lowest COVID-19 surveillance deaths of any month in 2022.

  • We estimate that COVID-19 deaths will result in excess mortality of around 6% (+2,800) for August to October 2022, with overall excess mortality likely to be higher than this.

  • We continue to expect that COVID-19 will be the third leading cause of death in Australia in 2022.
 
https://www.actuaries.digital/2022/...-month-of-high-excess-mortality-in-july-2022/

In summary:

  • Total excess mortality for the month of July 2022 is estimated at 16% (+2,600 deaths), relative to expected mortality at pre-pandemic levels.

  • Total excess mortality for the first seven months of 2022 is 14% (+13,700 deaths).

  • Around half of the excess mortality for the first seven months of 2022 is due to COVID-19 (+7,100 deaths) with remaining excess of +6,600 due to the remaining causes.

  • October 2022 has the lowest COVID-19 surveillance deaths of any month in 2022.

  • We estimate that COVID-19 deaths will result in excess mortality of around 6% (+2,800) for August to October 2022, with overall excess mortality likely to be higher than this.

  • We continue to expect that COVID-19 will be the third leading cause of death in Australia in 2022.
I never intended to imply all excess deaths are due to COVID and it's beside the point.
 

Well said but those that were fooled are not escaping karma. Many will be crippled or dead within the next 3-5 years. Having said that there are many who do wake up & try to warn others not to believe the lies.

NURSE INJURED BY PFIZER VAXXX HAS POWERFUL MESSAGE FOR UNVAXXED!



But sadly there are those that will never be able to break their conditioning. They are brainwashed forever.

BRAINWASHED CLUELESS VAXXX INJURED WOMAN STILL WANTS MANDATORY INJECTIONS!


 
Last edited:
If Andrew Tate is on your side, you really need to rethink your side
If Andrew Tate (or anyone else) speaks the truth then you really are foolish not to listen & learn. But hey, you do you Plucky.
 
Last edited:
Jake Shields tweet:


I know a couple of clueless posters on this message board that must be baffled as well. Chuckle. But believe you me they will no longer be baffled after they get diagnosed with myocarditis, cancer, an autoimmune disorder or any of the other 9 pages of known side effects. Things will get crystal clear for them at that point. If they have any love for their fellow man they will make a video from their hospital bed warning others not to get injected like they did.
 
Hides the other thread and the mountain of evidence that makes him look really foolish, and then lets
the Big Pharma minions run interference in this one, totally unabated?

I won't be paying to be a member of a website that lets their moderators operate like this anymore.





Now, let's get this thread back on topic:



*New CDC report shows:
(94% of COVID-19 deaths in US had contributing conditions)

ATLANTA, Ga. (WJW) — The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new data last week that depicts how many Americans who have died from COVID-19 also had contributing conditions.


Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.

Table-3.png


According to the report, only 6% of deaths have COVID-19 as the only cause mentioned, revealing that 94% of patients who died from coronavirus also had other “health conditions and contributing causes.”




The CDC listed the following as the top underlying medical conditions linked to coronavirus deaths:

  • Influenza and pneumonia
  • Respiratory failure
  • Hypertensive disease
  • Diabetes
  • Vascular and unspecified dementia
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Heart failure
  • Renal failure
  • Intentional and unintentional injury, poisoning and other adverse events
  • Other medical conditions


The report reads in part:


https://www.wfla.com/community/heal...aths-in-us-had-underlying-medical-conditions/


But the FDA still decided to approve the fake vaccine for your kid's vaccination schedule.
Some of us find this all very suspicious. Some of you don't at all...so, who's the fool here?
 
Last edited:
This Covid scam was one of the biggest crimes against humanity in modern history. At best, the vaccines did nothing in either a positive or negative way and this whole thing was a ruse to enrich big pharma, transfer wealth from the underclasses to the rich, and encroach on the freedom and liberty of the average civilian. At worst, these shots are/were dangerous and will lead to many dead people. In either case, the criminals who perpetuated this injustice will get away with it, as they always do.
 
Didn't you cry and complain when I pointed out the two week window for most injuries lol?


Did I? Not sure your context tbh as I've highlighted the fraud from the start of my posting in this thread. I have always highlighted both that you don't count as vaxxed and if you get coincidenced.

If you were saying only the two week period I would have disagreed. I've posted that Steve Kirsch did a good breakdown that by the numbers if you don't keel or be injured/maimed initially its the 5 month mark that seems to knock people off their perch. Weird clots building up, or strokes or obviously autoimmune disease.


Glad you understood the implications of another way to look at it.
 
@Handy Capped

"If you look at the excess death data you can easily see the approximate number of deaths due to COVID."
.
.
.
.
"I never intended to imply all excess deaths are due to COVID and it's beside the point"


Meth, you use it or does it use you?

User name checks out
 
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/...Q.pu5LUd--H8P1v8i_OR-gszYxMEFgXOcOYPY2jUTLOdg

"The need for analysis of excess mortality and its correlation with C19 injections grows more urgent"


"Association Between Vaccines and EXCESS MORTALITY Getting Stronger -- and is Discussed in UK Parliament (substack.com)

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/association-between-vaccines-and

and a few days ago here:

Excess Mortality is Worse than It Seems - by Igor Chudov (substack.com)

ttps://igorchudov.substack.com/p/excess-mortality-is-worse-than-it

He faces the same problems that we all do, access to quality data
."


Remember Scotland hiding the live birth and covid death data? It was being misrepresented by the ANTIVAXXERS, the antithinkers were starting to ask questions.
 
@Handy Capped

"If you look at the excess death data you can easily see the approximate number of deaths due to COVID."
.
.
.
.
"I never intended to imply all excess deaths are due to COVID and it's beside the point"


Meth, you use it or does it use you?

User name checks out
Those two statements are true. Logic, motherfucker, do you even?

But seriously, I also didn't say there was anything wrong with making that assumption based upon my wording. I can see how that could happen and that's why I responded, beginning with "I never intended...."

To be clear, going back to the original statement, it is true the excess death data provides a reasonable approximation of the total number of COVID-related deaths despite the fact that not all excess deaths were due to COVID. Any source that I have found provides a full explanation of this process, which is statistical in nature. I was a little rushed in my earlier post and by the time I returned to the thread, I already expected this objection to be raised--but again lacked this opportunity to address it.

Have a nice day, and take your meth with you.
 
Those two statements are true. Logic, motherfucker, do you even?

But seriously, I also didn't say there was anything wrong with making that assumption based upon my wording. I can see how that could happen and that's why I responded, beginning with "I never intended...."

To be clear, going back to the original statement, it is true the excess death data provides a reasonable approximation of the total number of COVID-related deaths despite the fact that not all excess deaths were due to COVID. Any source that I have found provides a full explanation of this process, which is statistical in nature. I was a little rushed in my earlier post and by the time I returned to the thread, I already expected this objection to be raised--but again lacked this opportunity to address it.

Have a nice day, and take your meth with you.


Old mate was right , you're up there in the shit poster lists.

Thats some rediculous cognitive dissonance coming your way and you excuse making is poor.

I can comfortably say I'm not on meth, you can see it because I'm making sense, just saying....
 
Last edited:
The doubling down downies are trying their best to derail this thread.


Hey retards, this is the vaccine PROTEST thread. Go double down in your own thread. Being in favor of the poison is off topic.

My favorite thing to do is ask you to boost up because it will increase your chances of dying.

Doing Pfizer's dirty work on a Karate forum. JFC.

Literally retarded.

<36>

The fake vaxxx wasn't even designed to try to stop the spread according to Pfizer.

<36>

It does nothing positive. You were duped.

<36>

Just knowing that stuff is in you...

<28><36>

<36>

How will people with natural immunity survive?!

<MikeP1>
<36>
giphy.gif
 
The doubling down downies are trying their best to derail this thread.


Hey retards, this is the vaccine PROTEST thread. Go double down in your own thread. Being in favor of the poison is off topic.

My favorite thing to do is ask you to boost up because it will increase your chances of dying.

Doing Pfizer's dirty work on a Karate forum. JFC.

Literally retarded.

<36>

The fake vaxxx wasn't even designed to try to stop the spread according to Pfizer.

<36>

It does nothing positive. You were duped.

<36>

Just knowing that stuff is in you...

<28><36>

<36>

How will people with natural immunity survive?!

<MikeP1>
<36>

Trying to 'protest' a vaccine on a karate thread.

Read that sentence again.

Yeah.

It doesn't get any dumber than that!
 
Back
Top