- Joined
- Nov 18, 2014
- Messages
- 4,450
- Reaction score
- 2,479
Please think for a couple more minutes before you post. You opened with saying that you think Khamzat is very good. What does that mean then? That he's very good but not good enough to beat Gerald Meerschaert? If that's the case - Khamzat was never any good, because Gerald is NOT good. The MMA casuals are too deep in with the narrative that fighters develop grately between fights. That's NOT the case. Khamzat will not be a much better fighter in. let's say, 6 months. In other words that means that if he would fight another fighter, possibly lower ranked than Gerald, and win, it would not mean that his chances of beating Gerald in 6 months would be greater.
This sport is nothing like team sports where 18 year old players are getting thrown into the mix. Khamzat is soon 27 years of age and has trained for a long time. This is not too soon. Gerald is a lower tier talented fighter and that's it.
This sport is nothing like team sports where 18 year old players are getting thrown into the mix. Khamzat is soon 27 years of age and has trained for a long time. This is not too soon. Gerald is a lower tier talented fighter and that's it.