• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Social Gender ideology is dying, common sense prevailing

Dude, you're taking seriously studies where "Two Spirit gender" is a data point.
You're a fucking clown and any scientist that uses that as a data point is a clown as well.

Fuck outta here with that goofy shit.
Well, in real life Two-Spirit people exist. The fact that you don't understand what that means doesn't change anything.

Either you want to understand gender or you don't. And clearly you don't.
 
Well, in real life Two-Spirit people exist. Just because you don't understand what that means doesn't change anything.

Either you want to understand gender or you don't. And clearly you don't.
No they don't. just because you don't understand what that means doesn't change a thing.
 
But they do though

I wonder if this jackass even understands what the movie his avatar is about is about.

It's from Lars Von Trier's Antichrist, which depicts the traditional dichotomy between the "rational" male scientific establishment, in its attempt to constrain the feral (pagan) essence of femininity, which escapes all civilization, and blurs the borders between animality and humanity, nature and culture.

A psychoanalyst husband tries cure his wife after their young child fell from a window while they were porking, by essentially raping her, to reenact the act as source of grief as a way to traverse the trauma. The husband fails, as her descent to madness leads her to embrace chaos as the truth of nature, repressed by the masculine ego. The feral woman and nature wins, chaos reigns against the futile attempts by male reason to domesticate it.

It's actively trying to be a feminist movie, retarded as it is. Great director, though, but this dumb Manichean cliché colors most of his work (Dancer in the Dark, Melancholia, Dogville...)
 
I wonder if this jackass even understands what the movie his avatar is about is about.

It's from Lars Von Trier's Antichrist, which depicts the traditional dichotomy between the "rational" male scientific establishment, in its attempt to constrain the feral (pagan) essence of femininity, which escapes all civilization, and blurs the borders between animality and humanity, nature and culture.

A psychoanalyst husband tries cure his wife after their young child fell from a window while they were porking, by essentially raping her, to reenact the act as source of grief as a way to traverse the trauma. The husband fails, as her descent to madness leads her to embrace chaos as the truth of nature, repressed by the masculine ego. The feral woman and nature wins, chaos reigns against the futile attempts by male reason to domesticate it.

It's actively trying to be a feminist movie, retarded as it is. Great director, though, but this dumb Manichean cliché colors most of his work (Dancer in the Dark, Melancholia, Dogville...)
Never seen it. It sounds weird and bad.
 
LOL, no dummy one is a made up thing you can change, the other is a biological trait you're born with whether you like it or not.

Like I'm 6 feet tall, and that's a fact. I can say I identify with being 7 feet tall all I want, but I'll never be 7 feet tall, and I can't call you a bigot if you refuse to confirm that I'm 7 feet tall, it's just fucken stupid.

LOL @ "made up social construct". You're a 2010 account, so a fully grown man, and you buy into the most ridiculous fairy tales... just sad and pathetic.
You really should have more of an open mind. @joy2day gave you an opening to better understand trans people and how they experience the world and all you can do is go back to your own view of absolutes. And you do it in a way to try to minimize the people you disagree with.

You don’t have a reason to have more empathy for trans individuals. Some people do. Try for a moment to put yourself in someone else’s shoes.
 
No it’s not. Trans people have existed, do exist, and will continue to exist.

Weird bigots who have never been negatively affected by a trans person will continue to be stirred up and exploited for their votes by right wing politicians who don’t have an actual platform and need to rely on creating imaginary issues to keep the stupid angry people stupid and angry.

If you can’t simply call someone what they prefer, you’re just a piece of shit human and the world would be better without you.

So you get to call people weird, bigots, and pieces of shit, but others can't simply refer to people as male/female if they think that's what they are?

I am never going to call a trans-woman a female or a she because I don't believe that. You don't get to force me to say something I don't believe and demand some version of respect when you aren't respecting my right to not have to lie.
 
Last edited:
You really should have more of an open mind. @joy2day gave you an opening to better understand trans people and how they experience the world and all you can do is go back to your own view of absolutes. And you do it in a way to try to minimize the people you disagree with.

You don’t have a reason to have more empathy for trans individuals. Some people do. Try for a moment to put yourself in someone else’s shoes.
How about you flip that and ask trans people to do the same thing, have them put themselves in the shoes of 99% of the population and ask themselves, "shit, is it really fair to ask the vast majority of the population to reverse all they know because I'm fucked up and don't like my genitals?"

What makes more sense, that 99% of the population change their behaviour for the 1%, or that the 1% adapt to the 99%?
 


Empathy and understanding are very important on such delicate subjects that can be weaponized into further dividing and conquering people.

Yes leave the children alone but no need to go full ignorant with "2 spirited doesn't exist at all".
 
LOL I use the word tranny. You really think I am some ally? How lost are you?
"I think a lot of the older posters are terrified of trannies. We all care about female sports now. Seriously who gives a fuck about women's sports. Oh yea we also got Euro and Canadian MAGAs now. That is a weird one because Americans really don't give two shits about other countries. Sherdog hates muslims, trannies, BLM/rap-music and sometimes insert foreign race or dog breeds."


That's you, verbatim. I didn't add or change anything.

I've asked you about it like 4 times and you refused to explain why you listed every lefty talking point but you wanna convince me you're a centrist. What am I supposed to think?
 
What are "trans rights" and how do they differ from the human rights those people already have?
The right to be who they are.


And if you want to remain cordial in the Heavies, I suggest you drop it. I know you are a transphobe, but I have no interest in discussing it with you.
 
Back
Top