Gagging for it (SCO Thread v. 29) Update Mueller Report Released

Status
Not open for further replies.
bobgeese said:
Bad news for you gullible brainlets who thought Trump would go down for treason,

https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/06.27.18 Interview Of Peter Strzok.pdf


Strzoks testimony was leaked, page 44 he specifically states they were worried about “members of the trump campaign being promoted”.


They were not investigating Trump. Furthermore, on the entire charge of Russians trying to compromise members of the trump campaign, in Strzoks own words.


There is no there, there.

He said that after investigating for almost a year.


How fucking stupid are you all going to feel when the Meuller dud goes poof?


<Dany07>
Click to expand...

.....I was assured this investigation was air tight and nothing would be leaked.
 
waiguoren said:
Mueller ‘Pit Bull’ Andrew Weissmann Leaving Russia Probe

andrew-weissmann-cspan-640x480.jpg


Top prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, known as special counsel Robert Mueller’s “legal pit bull,” is reportedly leaving the Russia probe, signaling the two-plus year investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin is drawing to a close.
Weissmann will both teach and study at New York University and undertake several public service projects, which include preventing wrongful convictions by boosting the court system’s forensic science standards, two unnamed sources told NPR.

Weissmann is credited for heading up the special counsel’s case against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who faces seven and one-half years in prison after judges in Virginia and Washington, D.C. handed down sentences of 47 months and 43 months in jail, respectively.


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...t-bull-andrew-weissmann-leaving-russia-probe/


<36><36>
Click to expand...

Given the exposure of criminals and liars and a 1.000 batting record in these cases, job well done I'd say.

Nobody can give me a good reason why they are such apologists for people if given the opportunity would rob you of everything you had and not give a single fuck.

Do you have no pride?
 
FIMN said:
Given the exposure of criminals and liars and a 1.000 batting record in these cases, job well done I'd say.

Nobody can give me a good reason why they are such apologists for people if given the opportunity would rob you of everything you had and not give a single fuck.

Do you have no pride?
Click to expand...

Definitely not a 1.000 batting record. How many of the indicted Russians do you expect to be convicted?

We already knew that Manafort was sketchy. We didn't need a 2+ year investigation to tell us this. Everyone else is getting hit on process crimes. Hilarious that you people invested so much energy into this.
 
AlexDB9 said:
So we agree then? The opportunities are there if you want them. This is not the case in other places
Click to expand...
No, we don't agree. There are some opportunities for some people and of them, some are successful and some aren't. Stop sounding like the typical right-wing "being poor is all the poor person's fault" types around here. I give you more credit than that (despite what I see as a twisted view of how well Trump is performing as POTUS.)
 
FIMN said:
Given the exposure of criminals and liars and a 1.000 batting record in these cases, job well done I'd say.

Nobody can give me a good reason why they are such apologists for people if given the opportunity would rob you of everything you had and not give a single fuck.

Do you have no pride?
Click to expand...
Of course he doesn't, nor any self-respect. See the lounge thread for all the evidence you need.
 
waiguoren said:
Definitely not a 1.000 batting record. How many of the indicted Russians do you expect to be convicted?

We already knew that Manafort was sketchy. We didn't need a 2+ year investigation to tell us this. Everyone else is getting hit on process crimes. Hilarious that you people invested so much energy into this.
Click to expand...
How many of those who were indicted were found not guilty?
 
waiguoren said:
Definitely not a 1.000 batting record. How many of the indicted Russians do you expect to be convicted?

We already knew that Manafort was sketchy. We didn't need a 2+ year investigation to tell us this. Everyone else is getting hit on process crimes. Hilarious that you people invested so much energy into this.
Click to expand...
except that is demonstrable false, so why you lying?

At the start the refrain from the TrumpBots was 'No collusion between Trump Campaign and Russia'. That was the repeated mantra.

It was only since the Trump Campaign collusion has come out as a result of the Mueller investigation the TrumpBots have changed along with Rudy song sheet to say 'ok, not saying the campaign did not collude, but Trump specifically did not'. And we know that has morphed to 'even if Trump colluded that is not illegal', based on them trying to do damage control based on what they expect to come out with the Mueller report.
 
waiguoren said:
Wrong question. The right question is: what percentage of the counts in the indictments have resulted in guilty pleas?
Click to expand...
No. he was correct and you are being dumb.

You do not judge a prosecution by the parties indicted who are in jurisdictions with no treaty in place to produce them for trial.

that would be a complete nonsense way to judge. Instead you judge by the one he can bring to trial and if he is hitting 100% that is great. It is also indicative, at a minimum of what would happen if he could force the others to appear.
 
Hunter Simpson said:
No, we don't agree. There are some opportunities for some people and of them, some are successful and some aren't. Stop sounding like the typical right-wing "being poor is all the poor person's fault" types around here. I give you more credit than that (despite what I see as a twisted view of how well Trump is performing as POTUS.)
Click to expand...

Like I told another poster you have to understand I come from a completely different point of view than most of you. Being “poor” (btw poor here is not poor where I come from) is not entirely a persons fault sure....not everyone is born with a silver spoon in their mouth, but the beauty of this country is that there are avenues to advance your self. I mean is that out of line to say? You can succeed, you can ignore it, you can try and not succeed....but they are there

Even my most Dem of Dems bros can realize that Trump is doing good stuff, that’s not a bad thing to say
 
MikeMcMann said:
No. he was correct and you are being dumb.

You do not judge a prosecution by the parties indicted who are in jurisdictions with no treaty in place to produce them for trial.

that would be a complete nonsense way to judge. Instead you judge by the one he can bring to trial and if he is hitting 100% that is great. It is also indicative, at a minimum of what would happen if he could force the others to appear.
Click to expand...


He’s batting zero percent FFS.

Manafort, a known piece of shit, got far less than the recommendation. This alone shows just how fucked out “Justice” system is.

GP got a literal 12 day vacation.

13 Russian shitposters who will never set foot in court.

Flynn still hasn’t been sentenced, and likely won’t. The entire investigation into him was based on him conversating with a ginger Russian bitch.



The entire debacle is an embarrassment. As are you, and every other brainlet who thought/prayed this would finally be the end of drumpphhhuuuucccvkkk.


<TheDonald>
 
waiguoren said:
Definitely not a 1.000 batting record. How many of the indicted Russians do you expect to be convicted?

We already knew that Manafort was sketchy. We didn't need a 2+ year investigation to tell us this. Everyone else is getting hit on process crimes. Hilarious that you people invested so much energy into this.
Click to expand...

RE your first point you're right I guess? Seems like a technicality though. If they hadn't of filed the charges I guess he would be at 1.000 but probably needed to to support the other cases where the defendants were within the jurisdiction. At the very least information has come out about the attacks on the democratic process so that's always good.

Your position seems to be what I can only term as pro-swamp. It seems like you don't want those who commit fraudulent and other pernicious acts to be prosecuted, rather than ignored as they have been in the past. This, coupled within your blathering about 'process crimes (As though these aren't worthy of prosecution) has the effect of making you seem like an apologist for criminals, even though they would see you robbed or killed without giving a fuck.

I only use this word because it seems to fit, but you're basically a cuck at this point.
 
bobgeese said:
He’s batting zero percent FFS.

Manafort, a known piece of shit, got far less than the recommendation. This alone shows just how fucked out “Justice” system is.

GP got a literal 12 day vacation.

13 Russian shitposters who will never set foot in court.

Flynn still hasn’t been sentenced, and likely won’t. The entire investigation into him was based on him conversating with a ginger Russian bitch.



The entire debacle is an embarrassment. As are you, and every other brainlet who thought/prayed this would finally be the end of drumpphhhuuuucccvkkk.


<TheDonald>
Click to expand...
Haha. More indictments and guilty pleas or findings than any other in the history of the US.

Manaforts jail time is amongst the longest ever given to a politico, in any POTUS related investigation.

This Mueller investigation keeps setting records in every single way for indictments, money forfeited, people serving jail time, length of jail time, and its not even close to done in that regard. Let alone all the secondary investigations he has passed off to State prosecutors that will also get more guilty pleas and findings.


And what do the most stupid Trumpbots do,... they try to spin it all as nothing. LOFL. Records for convictions in every regard for white collar crimes, related to gov't officials which historically see little punishment is nothing.

what-a-maroon-gif.gif
 
waiguoren said:
Wrong question. The right question is: what percentage of the counts in the indictments have resulted in guilty pleas?
Click to expand...

So if someone gets indicted and dies before the trial that counts as a fail?
 
AlexDB9 said:
Like I told another poster you have to understand I come from a completely different point of view than most of you. Being “poor” (btw poor here is not poor where I come from) is not entirely a persons fault sure....not everyone is born with a silver spoon in their mouth, but the beauty of this country is that there are avenues to advance your self. I mean is that out of line to say? You can succeed, you can ignore it, you can try and not succeed....but they are there

Even my most Dem of Dems bros can realize that Trump is doing good stuff, that’s not a bad thing to say
Click to expand...
Whatever good things he may deserve credit for are far outweighed be the damage he has caused. I think we'll have to agree to disagree on that point however. Bear in mind that 3 organizations for which he is the titular head are or were under investigation for fraud, Trump U, the Trump Foundation, and the Trump Org. I don't know why you want a crook running the country. I mean, he stole from a charity FFS.

About your first paragraph, no, I'm not disputing that. I'm disputing the characterization that if someone is poor it's because they just didn't try hard enough.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,720
Messages
58,314,042
Members
175,997
Latest member
Fitboy485

Share this page

Back
Top