I like calling Krav Maga "Jew-Jitsu". :icon_chee
Rather than greeting each other with Osu, they bow and say Shalom.
I like calling Krav Maga "Jew-Jitsu". :icon_chee
I like calling Krav Maga "Jew-Jitsu". :icon_chee
Here are the arguements I take with Krav. And I studied it for 6months at a regional training center.
B: The striking in Krav is just crappy MT and boxing. And the grappling is just SUPER CRAPPY jiu jitsu, judo and wrestling.
C: The combatives are pretty good actually (especially the ones for weapons) HOWEVER!!! There is absolutely no reason to train at a KM school. 100% of the techniques they teach to civilians can be found in their books and dvds, the total cost of which would be less than 2 months tutition at a KM school; so just get the material and train it with friends or athletes. AND YOU CAN'T ARGUE AGAINST THIS, BECAUSE THEIR WHOLE PHILOSOPHY IS BASED ON THE IDEA THAT THE TECHNIQUES CAN BE USED WITHOUT EXTENSIVE TRAINING AND ARE INSTINCTIVE AND REFLEXIVE. SO WHY PAY MONEY TO LEARN FROM THEM EVERYMONTH WHEN I CAN JUST BUY THEIR BOOKS, TRAIN AT A STRIKING AND GRAPPLING GYM AND HAVE THE BEST OF ALL WORLDS?
We MMA guys
Here's my problem with such sintagmatic constructions: unlike, say, Krav Maga, MMA is not a style or martial art, and never will be.
Here's my problem with such sintagmatic constructions: unlike, say, Krav Maga, MMA is not a style or martial art, and never will be.
There is always someone out there tougher... unless you're Brock Lesnar... still the toughest S.O.B. around.
I've been taking krav maga for almost a year with no prior experiance and have learned an awful lot
You mean syntagmatic structure? By the way...syntax refers to the construction of the sentence, not the meaning of the words within the sentence per say. Instead of using wikipedia to sound smart, try just saying it like you mean it:
"the problem you have with statements like that is that MMA isn't a style..."
Not to mention that while MMA is generally a type of sport venue which can comprise of many different styles of martial arts...saying "we MMA guys" simple refers to people who train in MMA gyms which is a perfectly adequate method of describing a sub-group.
Though I would argue that MMA is quickly becoming it's own style...think about it...when someone says they practice MMA--what do you immediately know about them? They probably have at minimum striking (punching and kicking typically from boxing and muay thai) and some sort of clinch/ground game which could have been derived from wrestling, bjj, or judo more than likely. Just food for thought. Semantics are just that...semantics.
Krav Maga is fine.
Just make sure you take BJJ and muay thai first.
When someone says that they "practice MMA", i immediately think that they don't have the in depth experience in any discipline.
Krav is only good for a self defense situation where you need to disable and control the other guy quickly.
why bother with krav if you already have bjj and muay thai with those 2 arts you have the base for sufficient self defense right there maybe mix some kali in if your worried about weapons why take a watered down mix of those arts with a terrible quality control problem with their instructors.