Agree with most of what you said except for the part about GSP. If you are looking to fight smart, you ALWAYS take the fight to your opponent's weakness - fighter's who fight like they have something to prove are being courageous, ya, but not exactly smart.
And while I completely agree that Conor always comes to fight, I'm not so sure that standing and banging was any kind of act of courage. He was severely outmatched on the ground, his only option was to stand and trade. Conor was not scared of Nate at all, and his thinking that he could drop Nate with one punch, along with not worry about Nate's trademark pitter-patter, made him get frustrated and ultimately fatigued. You seem to be implying that Conor was a courageous hero that GSP could never replicate - I comlpletely disagree, reminding you that there is no such thing as courage with the absence of fear.
If you want to fight "smart", yes.
GSP fought to outpoint. He didn't
ever work for a finish, even when
working within the realm of his
strengths.
Conor believed in his ability as
a stand up fighter. As he should've.
As for courage being involved,
it takes courage to even step in
the cage... so I'm not trying to
diminish any aforementioned
fighters' courage. With that said,
there is never an absence of fear
in a fight. It's about how steady
you can remain while in the fire.
It's my opinion that Pierre made
a career out of avoiding the fire.
Whether it be through an over
abundance of fear or because he's
a cerebral fighter who fought to
out point... I don't know... I just
know that him & Mcgregor are not
the same breed of fighter.