FBI reopens Clinton investigation as new emails found PART 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Strychnine said:
Voting for one and starting one are miles apart.
Click to expand...

Yea except your doing nothing but making assumptions that Trump willl start one (when he's made it clear he doesn't want to be in Syria anymore). On the other hand you have Hillary voting for every war and then threatening a no fly zone and basically poking the bear that is Russia and for what?
 
Rational Poster said:
It's not surprising, this forum is filled with whiny man babies excited to win an election on technicality than the actual merit of their message.

I can't reply to all of them.
Click to expand...

Way to confirm how shit your post was
 
Strychnine said:
That's right. I was. I want my son to choose his own path. I'm to be vilified for this?



Take it from Pres. Reagan....
Click to expand...

LOL, are you using Ronald Fucking Reagan to denounce Trump as a warmonger? I hope you're just uninformed and not that much of an idiot.
 
indrid said:
the merit of their message? are you for real? hillary's message is flowing according to the opinion polls. if there'd be a poll saying 80% of americans believe people should wear blackface on halloween, she'd be "boogaa booga where the white women at" tonight.
Click to expand...

It's the truth.

Even with a good candidate, the Republican party has an uphill battle to win the White House.

Their only chance with such a shit heel like Trump is for his opponent to be disqualified. No one rooting for Hillary's failure actually cares, because let's face it, Trump has done some dirty shit too and I'm sure there's plenty hidden that since we still haven't seen his fucking taxes.

That's what this whole thing has been about from the start. Let's get the Democratic nominee disqualified so the Republican nominee has a chance to win.
 
Rational Poster said:
It's the truth.

Even with a good candidate, the Republican party has an uphill battle to win the White House.

Their only chance with such a shit heel like Trump is for his opponent to be disqualified. No one rooting for Hillary's failure actually cares, because let's face it, Trump has done some dirty shit too and I'm sure there's plenty hidden that since we still haven't seen his fucking taxes.

That's what this whole thing has been about from the start. Let's get the Democratic nominee disqualified so the Republican nominee has a chance to win.
Click to expand...

Shit posts like this make your screenname so much more funny

Yeah Hillary has just done "dirty shit"
 
Ruprecht said:
How exactly would you justify this announcement to congress and the public as a "necessity" given the lack of any actual information, the clear likelyhood of it influencing the election, FBI and DOJ policy on such behaviour and the Hatch act?
Click to expand...

Doesn't that go both ways? Assuming it's something substantial, wouldn't hiding it from the public also be influencing the election?

Regardless, I highly doubt you'd be touting this defense about traditional standard protocol, if say the FBI had announced it was investigating Trump for illegal activities this close to the election. You'd be laughing your ass off, just like the right is doing now.
 
HomerThompson said:
LOL, are you using Ronald Fucking Reagan to denounce Trump as a warmonger? I hope you're just uninformed and not that much of an idiot.
Click to expand...

So, You're saying that Pres. Reagan's words have no weight on this issue?
 
SMEAC said:
Shit posts like this make your screenname so much more funny

Yeah Hillary has just done "dirty shit"
Click to expand...


Sure, she's deflated some footballs, but she's still a good quarterback and doesn't mean we should take someone from the sidelines to quarterback the superbowl.
 
method115 said:
Yea except your doing nothing but making assumptions that Trump willl start one (when he's made it clear he doesn't want to be in Syria anymore). On the other hand you have Hillary voting for every war and then threatening a no fly zone and basically poking the bear that is Russia and for what?
Click to expand...

I'd rather stand up to the bear than become subservient to it.
 
HereticBD said:
Doesn't that go both ways? Assuming it's something substantial, wouldn't hiding it from the public also be influencing the election?

Regardless, I highly doubt you'd be touting this defense about traditional standard protocol, if say the FBI had announced it was investigating Trump for illegal activities this close to the election. You'd be laughing your ass off, just like the right is doing now.
Click to expand...

Not really. If there was something that important then surely there'd be more information than, "we have more emails to look at"? Otherwise he's still "hiding it from the public".
I mean, I would certainly never vote for a candidate like Trump. He's a complete buffoon with no policy ambition and no observable talent beyond self promotion.
I'm not really that invested in your election though. It's not like I can't see that the "grab them by the pussy" video was a smear campaign.
 
Ruprecht said:
Was the public nature of the FBI investigation normal procedure? Who do you think it served?
What about Comey's previous public announcements? Normal?
What about his comments about Clinton's careless actions?
Politicised from the outset, and not in Clintons favour.
How exactly would you justify this announcement to congress and the public as a "necessity" given the clear likelyhood of it influencing the election, FBI and DOJ policy on such behaviour and the Hatch act?
Click to expand...
Are these normal circumstances to quote normal procedure? I guess he should with hold that info from the public, and if/when Hillary gets impeached it wouldn't come down on him while also outraging our country, right?
Clinton's actions were careless lmfao what do you want? Comey to bow down to the Clintons? Its bad enough she isn't in jail, but you're upset cause he called her actions what they are?
Its a necessity cause people should know they are voting for someone who will be back under FBI investigation.
 
Rational Poster said:
Sure, she's deflated some footballs, but she's still a good quarterback and doesn't mean we should take someone from the sidelines to quarterback the superbowl.
Click to expand...

This is what I don't understand. Trump panders to the lowest common denominator and people are eating it out of his hand. You have someone who has been a career politician vs. someone who has claimed bankruptcy several times over and has repeatedly claimed that "I'll run America like I run my businesses."

Ok.

If he wins, I feel sorry for the American economy, I really do, because he'll tank it.
 
Ruprecht said:
Was the public nature of the FBI investigation normal procedure? Who do you think it served?
What about Comey's previous public announcements? Normal?
What about his comments about Clinton's careless actions?
Politicised from the outset, and not in Clintons favour.
How exactly would you justify this announcement to congress and the public as a "necessity" given the lack of any actual information, the clear likelyhood of it influencing the election, FBI and DOJ policy on such behaviour and the Hatch act?
Click to expand...

Read the WSJ article I linked towards the end of V2.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-...to-hillary-clintons-private-server-1477854957

DOJ has long fought to suppress FBI's investigation of the Clintons.

And regarding the last batch of emails, the FBI has looked at the metadata (subject, to/from, date) and determined that there are tens of thousands of emails from the addresses they were targeting (clintonemail.com, and .gov).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,218
Messages
57,975,495
Members
175,889
Latest member
MEthzale

Share this page

Back
Top