FBI raids office of Michael Cohen, personal attorney to Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
grimballer said:
Yeah just make up some charges to go after the guy

Definition of partisan hack
Click to expand...
Yep, damn Rosenstein (R), Geoffrey Berman (R) who had to recuse due to tRUmp connections, and the judge who signed are all R's. You need to gtfo partisan hack, adults are still conversing. See yourself to the kid's table
 
Bobby 3 Sticks said:
Yep, damn Rosenstein (R), Geoffrey Berman (R) who had to recuse due to tRUmp connections, and the judge who signed are all R's. You need to gtfo partisan hack, adults are still conversing. See yourself to the kid's table
Click to expand...

Probably all the anti trumpers who wanted Hillary over him

But hey those are just small details

What’s important is

Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!

Maybe if you scream loud enough it will come true
 
grimballer said:
Probably all the anti trumpers who wanted Hillary over him

But hey those are just small details

What’s important is

Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!

Maybe if you scream loud enough it will come true
Click to expand...
All it takes is the Dems taking the house in Nov to impeach in January. You realize that impeachment =/= removal. Impeachment is merely the trial process. Senate votes on removal following the impeachment hearings in the house.

nevermind you parrot fox, you probably didn't know that
 
Bobby 3 Sticks said:
All it takes is the Dems taking the house in Nov to impeach in January. You realize that impeachment =/= removal. Impeachment is merely the trial process. Senate votes on removal following the impeachment hearings in the house.

nevermind you parrot fox, you probably didn't know that
Click to expand...

About that collusion with Russia again...
 
Bobby 3 Sticks said:
All it takes is the Dems taking the house in Nov to impeach in January. You realize that impeachment =/= removal. Impeachment is merely the trial process. Senate votes on removal following the impeachment hearings in the house.

nevermind you parrot fox, you probably didn't know that
Click to expand...



I seriously doubt they would go there if they win the house.


Notice none of the top folks are calling for it (Chuck Nancy etc). They have to know it would set a terrible precedent.


Obviously if trump was found to have committed a serious crime, they would have a reason to do it.

That being said, they’re gonna run on that shit like a motherfucker. Politics.
 
bobgeese said:
I seriously doubt they would go there if they win the house.


Notice none of the top folks are calling for it (Chuck Nancy etc). They have to know it would set a terrible precedent.


Obviously if trump was found to have committed a serious crime, they would have a reason to do it.

That being said, they’re gonna run on that shit like a motherfucker. Politics.
Click to expand...

Impeachment proceedings would begin on day 1 of Dems taking the house as well they should
 
waiguoren said:
How would you cap the chances?
Click to expand...
Cap the chances? Does that mean estimate the chances?

If so, he seems to have surrounded himself with crooks and there is mounting concern that he's trying to find a way to shut down the investigation.

The chances, I think, are low but rising. It has gone from bad to worse for him and it seems he's involved in some shady shit.
 


Pay attention to the point of interest surrounding Harvey Weinstein near the end of the interview.
 
bobgeese said:
You have no argument. The payments have been documented and reported about in the NYT. Now, I know their credibility is shit, but, you’re some guy named cake on the Internet. Nyt>Cake


And, I seem to recall there being a hole in your argument where you can’t explain tens of millions of dollars being ever so generously donated to the Clintons sham charity.


And if you step outside your safe space for 5 minutes you’ll also notice I said nothing will ever come of it. It’s called politics. Don’t ever, ever hold your breath waiting for the people in power to be held accountable.
Click to expand...

Bob, we already did this and you quit because you got exposed. Just because you have the memory of an aquarium fish doesn't mean that didn't happen.

th


http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/c...estigation-v-14.3716441/page-5#post-138937237
 
waiguoren said:
The key word is "potential". Anytime federal LEOs raid anything, we should be on the lookout for civil rights violations. Do you agree?
Click to expand...


In general we should be on the lookout for civil rights violations for your average person, yes. But the POTUS, because of his power, his legal insulation that comes with his WH lawyers, and his ability to afford any personal attorney out there, lessens any concern I might have. In contrast, I am concerned that given those things, he believes that he is, and has been, above the law, verses any "potential" violations of his rights, as he has the fiances to pay the best of the best attorneys to stand up to any wrongfully gained evidence. I am about as concerned about "potential grizzlies" as I am about that, but I am more concerned about "potential pandas" given Tucker Carlson's latest dire warnings.

th
 
Jack V Savage said:
It strains credulity to think that Russia wouldn't ask for and get something for the hack, actually. Especially since it was someone that had a kind of dependent relationship on them before the campaign even started.

I think the question is whether Russia even considered it necessary (that is, if they already saw Trump as someone they could completely control, they'd just want to help and wouldn't need a specific deal). But I think that's pushing it a little far. More likely, it was another bit of leverage (and note that apparently the only issue that Trump's team cared about in the GOP platform was support for pro-West factions in Ukraine).
Click to expand...

Applying Occam's razor: Putin probably preferred Trump to Clinton primarily because, during the campaign, the former made multiple statements about fixing relations with Russia while the latter used extensive anti-Putin rhetoric. Further, Russia had experience with Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State.

Also, many people are performing huge logical leapsin asserting confidently that the Russia government stole DNC e-mails and deliberately released them to harm the Clinton campaign.
 
Last edited:
waiguoren said:
Applying Occam's razor: Putin probably preferred Trump to Clinton primarily because the former made warm overtures during the campaign while the latter used extensive anti-Putin rhetoric.

Also, many people are performing huge logical leapsin asserting confidently that the Russia government stole DNC e-mails and deliberately released them to harm the Clinton campaign.
Click to expand...
I still think his Deutschebank loans got sold to Russian oligarchs and that's the influence there
 
Overpressure said:
Cap the chances? Does that mean estimate the chances?
Click to expand...

Gambler's terminology. "Cap" is short for "handicap".

Overpressure said:
The chances, I think, are low but rising. It has gone from bad to worse for him and it seems he's involved in some shady shit.
Click to expand...

If your estimate rises over 50%, holla at me. I will happily take your sig.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,169
Messages
57,972,251
Members
175,887
Latest member
kaneoconnor98

Share this page

Back
Top