Red sky at night, Putin's delight*Shit storm gathers strength and barrels closer*
Surely you see how ridiculous you've been sounding throughout this thread.
You're basically saying that instead of operating according to the law and precedent, we need to radically change our system before we can look into corruption at the WH
If you want to say that after the Mueller investigation concludes, we should change the process for investigating presidents, that would be a more reasonable argument
It's also comical that the same people who were supportive of Republicans conducting eight separate investigations into the same matter in unsuccessful attempt to find wrongdoing by their opponent in the presidential election (zero indictments) are now freaking out about mission creep (which, NB, isn't like the Benghazi investigations in that they changed course after failing to find anything but is expanding after investigators have found multiple indications of criminal activity).
Impractical? What's impractical about dividing the Justice Department into prosecutorial and advisory wings? The UK and Israel do the same thing.No, I understand, but Dershowitz is being totally impractical about how the justice system ought to be, Rosenstein had to work within the structure of the justice system.
I heard it was to do a Friday the 13th marathon this Friday.I heard he canceled the trip because of Syria....
Real talk: only personal action by the AG can remove a Special Counsel, and it requires an actual valid reason. So we shall see what kind of fuckery ensues when the Trumpster finally flips the switch.
No, I did not write that. The current investigation should continue or---as Alan Dershowitz has proposed---a nonpartisan commission should be established in its stead. Even if we were to amend the current system while the Mueller investigation is ongoing, I would advocate that the changes only apply going forward.
All of this said, it must be noted that Trump does have the legal authority to fire Mueller. He would probably face political consequences. All of this is more evidence supporting Dershowitz's view.
Yes, although I would prefer that it be suspended so that a nonpartisan commission could take over. That's Dershowitz's suggestion.So we agree that the investigation should continue
Trump attempting to stop it would essentially be an attack on rule of law in America
Well now we know that at least one of Trumps legal advisors posts on teh SherdogzYes, although I would prefer that it be suspended so that a nonpartisan commission could take over. That's Dershowitz's suggestion.
No. Trump has that authority. It would be an "attack on the rule of law" only if Bill Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich had been the same. Both are cases of the president wielding his executive authority.
A description of Trump’s penis should be in the final report.
Yeah, good luck finding that when Mueller, Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein - all life long Republicans are considered liberal partisans out to get Trump now. "Non-partisan" only means people who think Trump is pure as the driven snow, otherwise your a liberal hack or deep state minion out to get him.Yes, although I would prefer that it be suspended so that a nonpartisan commission could take over. That's Dershowitz's suggestion.
So we agree that the investigation should continue, and Trump attempting to stop it would essentially be an attack on rule of law in America?
Even if so, most of your posts in this thread have been attempts to minimize the findings and the possible corruption involved here.
He is flailing.Must be a tough time for you right now. lol
Yes, although I would prefer that it be suspended so that a nonpartisan commission could take over. That's Dershowitz's suggestion.
No. Trump has that authority. It would be an "attack on the rule of law" only if Bill Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich had been the same. Both are cases of the president wielding his executive authority.