There is as much evidence of Putin murdering anyone as there is Hillary Clinton.
Someone check this guys IP address
Sure, who’s to say a KGB Lt. Colonel, member of the national security council, and member of the Red Army Faction who’s detractors all fall out of windows and die actually has any blood on his hands or not.
I can say the exact same thing about some 'suspicious' deaths related to Clinton. And if I wrote a news story every time someone died suspiciously who criticized a politician on a particular side in America, we would get headlines every week. Why is one a conspiracy theory and the other is not, despite all the evidence being circumstantial?
Yes it’s been going on since the beginning of the war. For whatever reason, Putin has chosen throwing people off buildings and out of windows as his MO for assassinations.
Comparing Clinton to Putin is some Olympic level whataboutism
Both have zero evidence or link to either of them and are just completely circumstantial evidence. Perhaps you should reflect on why you 100% know one is guilty and why the other is conspiracy theory when both are completely based on circumstantial evidence? Why does the level of evidence being equal result in opposite extremes in your eyes?
0 evidence of Putin having people killed is an exaggeration when the pattern of suspicious deaths is so clear. One of Putin’s detractors committed suicide by shooting himself in the chest five times.
www.lbc.co.uk
Opposite… they’re sending a message
I would be willing to pitch in with the rest of Sherdog war room and buy you a one way ticket to Moscow so you can go there and criticize Putin yourself.
0 evidence of Putin having people killed is an exaggeration when the pattern of suspicious deaths is so clear. One of Putin’s detractors committed suicide by shooting himself in the chest five times.
Sudden fatalities and falling from windows: The high-profile suspicious Russian deaths since the invasion of Ukraine
From a sausage tycoon found dead in a hotel, to a toad-venom shaman hangover cure gone wrong, this up-to-date list details all of the ‘suspicious’ high-profile Russian deaths which have been recorded since the outbreak of the war in Ukraine.
Again, there is literally no evidence tying any of that to Putin. This is exactly the same stuff as the Clinton hit-list, which has like 100 people who committed suicide, were murdered, etc. Why do you choose to believe one as undisputed fact and the other as conspiracy theory when the level of evidence is the same?0 evidence of Putin having people killed is an exaggeration when the pattern of suspicious deaths is so clear. One of Putin’s detractors committed suicide by shooting himself in the chest five times.
Sudden fatalities and falling from windows: The high-profile suspicious Russian deaths since the invasion of Ukraine
From a sausage tycoon found dead in a hotel, to a toad-venom shaman hangover cure gone wrong, this up-to-date list details all of the ‘suspicious’ high-profile Russian deaths which have been recorded since the outbreak of the war in Ukraine.
1.The Clinton Kill List is full of people who weren't even actually Hillary's enemies. If a Clinton fund raiser died in a plane crash, they add it to the list. Why? If the deceased are accused of actually being Clinton's enemy, it's usually something like "they were planning to reveal her crimes (to who? when? where?)" etc, etc.
The way you throw around the word “evidence” leads me to believe that you don’t actually understand what it means.
There were plenty of people in the link that he posted that were people appointed by Putin and had no falling out whatsoever with him. Even people who were supportive of the Ukraine invasion. And again, none of the points you said are evidence that Putin ordered. It's the textbook definition of circumstantial evidence.
By your standard there’s 0 evidence he was murdered. Why do you believe this CT but not others?
