- Joined
- Feb 6, 2006
- Messages
- 9,078
- Reaction score
- 128
then go watch TMA movies retardYou fucking moron, that is not the point. The point is that, although I enjoy the fights, it doesn't really represent TRUE MARTIAL ARTS.
then go watch TMA movies retardYou fucking moron, that is not the point. The point is that, although I enjoy the fights, it doesn't really represent TRUE MARTIAL ARTS.
noPrime Tito Ortiz would still be elite today.
Again, this is my point... Blachowitz beats prime Ortiz?
the prime Tito that duck Liddell for years only to take an easier fight with a washed up Couture how'd that turn out...Absolutely!
Again, this is my point... Blachowitz beats prime Ortiz? No way .
Yes, that guy whips Blachowicz and takes down jones at will, culminating in a KO.the prime Tito that duck Liddell for years only to take an easier fight with a washed up Couture how'd that turn out...
The guys from the lower weight classes couldn't beat the guys from the bigger weight classes because the bigger fighters have gotten better too. Royce Gracie was able to beat the bigger guys because he was so much more skilled than them that the size difference didn't matter. Khabib would have no chance against Stipe for example because that isn't the case anymore. While I believe Khabib is more skilled overall than Stipe, the skill difference isn't so great that Khabib would be able to overcome the massive size disadvantage. That's why weight classes exist.I will ask you again, and type slower this time.... What current, lower weight class fighter from TODAY could win an original UFC 1 style tournament with the current UFC roster from HW on down?
That is what tells you that MMA, as fighting goes, has not evolved. You keep trying to compare athletes from today to back then, not fighting. I'm not talking about "the sport" either, pure fighting.
Now, I agree with you on the rules and those have to be in place for this to be a sanctioned sport but as fighters go, true evolution would lead us to smaller fighters being able to out maneuver larger fighters to win fights. However, if the rules of the sport are set and you are a "sport fighter" then you have to train within the rules and this, perhaps, has stymied the evolution of fighting because you are never fighting to stop your opponent, you are fighting to win by whatever means necessary... points, ko, tko, doctor stoppage.The guys from the lower weight classes couldn't beat the guys from the bigger weight classes because the bigger fighters have gotten better too. Royce Gracie was able to beat the bigger guys because he was so much more skilled than them that the size difference didn't matter. Khabib would have no chance against Stipe for example because that isn't the case anymore. While I believe Khabib is more skilled overall than Stipe, the skill difference isn't so great that Khabib would be able to overcome the massive size disadvantage. That's why weight classes exist.
Although I do think Izzy would beat most Light Heavyweights and Heavyweights and he will beat Jan next Saturday imo.
Here is the thing, UFC 1 wasn't true martial arts. It was a glorified underground tournament. Which if you're into that kind of thing that's cool, but that shit doesn't belong in MMA. Martial arts are supposed to have rules and be a fair contest. It's not supposed to be tattooed thugs punching each other in the balls.
No I'm not, you know that Usman's size, power, wrestling, and freakish cardio would be too much for the majority of Welterweights from a decade ago. You just don't want to admit it because of nostalgia or whatever. And because you have a hard on for UFC 1, which as I mentioned before, that's a moot point since the 2011 Welterweights wouldn't be able to win a UFC 1 style tournament either.You're reaching....
You don't need to have great head movement to be a great striker. If you have a good chin you can be a great striker without head movement, and so far Usman's chin has held up pretty well.If you are fan of the "rock-em sock-em" robot game, then, yes, he has great striking.
Here's the thing, the sport aspect is the only thing I care about. I don't care about who would win in a street fight or whatever. If I did, I could just watch two drunk bums fight at a bar. I watch MMA to see an athletic competition. Not to see guys get punched in the balls 50 times in a row.Now, I agree with you on the rules and those have to be in place for this to be a sanctioned sport but as fighters go, true evolution would lead us to smaller fighters being able to out maneuver larger fighters to win fights. However, if the rules of the sport are set and you are a "sport fighter" then you have to train within the rules and this, perhaps, has stymied the evolution of fighting because you are never fighting to stop your opponent, you are fighting to win by whatever means necessary... points, ko, tko, doctor stoppage.
I am not into "underground fighting" but would love to see an open weight tournament with UFC 1 rules to see what discipline is truly dominant. My belief is that it would still be a Jiu-Jitsu fighter that wins it all, HW or not. Think about how a Royce Gracie type fighter (smallish 170lbish 6ft guy but with today's advanced athletic training/nutrition) would have to beat a Francis Ngannou. Map out his path to victory in your head and you will understand my entire point.
You are correct in that welterweights from a decade ago wouldn't be able to win a UFC 1 style tournament and that proves my point.... neither would today's welterweights. There is no nostalgia in calling out the MMA pundits and hype jobs by the UFC when they say MMA has evolved. The sport itself has, but the fighters haven't.No I'm not, you know that Usman's size, power, wrestling, and freakish cardio would be too much for the majority of Welterweights from a decade ago. You just don't want to admit it because of nostalgia or whatever. And because you have a hard on for UFC 1, which as I mentioned before, that's a moot point since the 2011 Welterweights wouldn't be able to win a UFC 1 style tournament either.
Nice observation. I do agree with everything that you said and mostly because it describes the evolution of the "sport". The evolution physically, technically and strategically all pertain to the sport, itself, and the parameters set forth by the rules. What would a fighter's, a fighter of any size, technical and strategical approach to a fight in which there were no rounds, time limits and a limited ruleset be? Fortunately or unfortunately, we haven't had a chance to find out how today's fighters would do. Is Usman good enough of a "fighter" to be Miocic or Ngannou? Is Khabib good enough to beat jones or Blachowicz? Could Volkanovski beat Usman or any of the other guys mentioned? If the answer is "no" then where is the evolution of the fighters themselves?Anybody who doesn’t think MMA has evolved technique and strategy wise is beyond help. The “rediscovery” of techniques still adds to “evolution.”
They key thing to remember is when certain implementations are “considered standard” and not rare techniques.
Think about it, “spinning shite” was frowned upon in the UFC and touted as flowery and too risky to use. Then... people learned how to apply and implement, and now spinning techniques, though not used in every fight, are still considered fundamental techniques along with spinning elbows. It’s not like people freak out if someone sees a spinning elbow....
The game has changed and fighters are truly getting better, either physically, technically or strategically.
This is a great example and probably a good reason Usman wouldn't do well at a higher weight class. Bigger guys hit harder and if he has no head movement, he will get cracked. If your strategy going in to a weight limited contest is "my chin will hold up so I don't have to duck" then would it be the same at an open weight tournament? Obviously not but then that would expose his "striking ability" because he would have to figure out how to land the strikes without being tagged himself.You don't need to have great head movement to be a great striker. If you have a good chin you can be a great striker without head movement, and so far Usman's chin has held up pretty well.
No I'm not, you know that Usman's size, power, wrestling, and freakish cardio would be too much for the majority of Welterweights from a decade ago.
Nice observation. I do agree with everything that you said and mostly because it describes the evolution of the "sport". The evolution physically, technically and strategically all pertain to the sport, itself, and the parameters set forth by the rules. What would a fighter's, a fighter of any size, technical and strategical approach to a fight in which there were no rounds, time limits and a limited ruleset be? Fortunately or unfortunately, we haven't had a chance to find out how today's fighters would do. Is Usman good enough of a "fighter" to be Miocic or Ngannou? Is Khabib good enough to beat jones or Blachowicz? Could Volkanovski beat Usman or any of the other guys mentioned? If the answer is "no" then where is the evolution of the fighters themselves?
I feel like we are turning a corner, brother. I understand why there are rules and weight classes. We would not have enjoyed the growth of the sport and it has been great to watch but my original post is based on exactly what you said and maybe, just maybe, we are agreeing on the same thing in a different way. The sport HAS EVOLVED but I don't think the fighters have. It probably has to do with the ruleset that they are training for. Gracie was more skilled than all of the fighters in UFC 1, 2, 3 and 4 but he was also severely outsized and out muscled by most of his competition. Take into account that for a few of his fights, they were on the ground with very little action but weren't stood up because of inactivity. One fight he won by holding on to a guy's hair and another by faking a kick to the nuts and going in for a takedown. He also had a couple of fights where 12-6 elbows to the back of his opponents head softened him up to sink in a choke and if you take all of those away with rules, hell, Gracie would have gotten his ass kicked back then, forget about now.Here's the thing, the sport aspect is the only thing I care about. I don't care about who would win in a street fight or whatever. If I did, I could just watch two drunk bums fight at a bar. I watch MMA to see an athletic competition. Not to see guys get punched in the balls 50 times in a row.
The smaller fighters would all be killed if there was a UFC 1 style tournament today. Again, Royce was able to beat everyone back in the day because the skill difference on the ground between him and the other fighters was so great that the size difference didn't matter. That isn't the case now. People who say they want a UFC 1 style tournament don't know what they are asking for. You guys would find out real quick that the weight classes exist for a reason.
groin strikecalf kick