Nunes is smarter than all the dems on that committee combinedWhich was led by Devin Nunes, noted whore.
Nunes is smarter than all the dems on that committee combinedWhich was led by Devin Nunes, noted whore.
See what's funny is, nothing in my post was from reality
Yup.The whole Ken Starr investigation took 4 years, millions of dollars of taxpayer money and all the Republicans had to show for it was 1 criminal conviction and one lie about a blowjob. Let's not even get into the 9 Benghazi congressional hearings which is more congressional hearings than 9/11 got and each hearing of course found Hillary did nothing wrong, which strangely enough didn't stop the Republicans from holding yet another hearing. It's almost enough to make you think that the whole Benghazi thing was just about politics and not about those dead embassy workers?
Nunes is smarter than all the dems on that committee combined
Spin spin sugar.
No. We do not care what is in a report based on a dossier paid for by Clinton to get unverified info from a foreign spy to be pushed by a cuck in the FBI banging a whore at the company that pushed it.
There is no grounds for this. No amount of TDS is going to change that and it has FINALLY gotten to a point where Democrats are getting sick of you LEFTIST wackjobs and your insanity.
So keep on denying reality. Soon you will be standing on a small island alone with the rest of the loons as the Democrats push you out and force you into obscurity like Republicans did with the cancer known as the Tea Party.
LOl at what a stupid Trumpbot one would have to be to think the Republican lead Senate investigation was going to find anything.
Hey genius, these are BI-PARTISAN findings. The Dem Senators are in agreement. This is isn't a fucking vote. That's why this is news...you goddamn clown.
LOL.
Can you agree that The Mueller investigation is much larger in scope, and his investigators have access to much more information than either the Senate or House committees, which were formed under highly partisan Republican leadership and limited in scope?
NO they are not. Stop lying. The Dem's are not saying there was no collusion. The Dems are saying we do not have the evidence to make any conclusion.Hey genius, these are BI-PARTISAN findings. The Dem Senators are in agreement. This isn't a fucking vote. That's why this is news...you goddamn clown.
LOL.
I hope so. We need to learn about the Genesis of the investigation. About the fisa warrants on Carter page who ironically was never charged with any crime. We need to find out about how George Papadopoulos was set up. We need to know why Rod Rosenstein signed off on a fisa warrant using the Steele dossier as the main source while overseeing Mueller. We need to find out what insurance policy struck and Page were talking about and how far to the top did it go. Hopefully Mueller is on the case.
NO they are not. Stop lying. The Dem's are not saying there was no collusion. The Dems are saying we do not have the evidence to make any conclusion.
The Tea Party became the freedom caucus, which still has quite a few of it's members in congress and it's committees.......
The republicans limited the scope including what could be asked or looked at. Just as the Republicans controlling the House did denying even Mueller access to stuff they had which he now gets with a Dem controlled Congress.Can you agree that The Mueller investigation is much larger in scope, and his investigators have access to much more information than either the Senate or House committees, which were formed under highly partisan Republican leadership and limited in scope?
Still waiting for you to address the video in the OP.
![]()
The republicans limited the scope including what could be asked or looked at. Just as the Republicans controlling the House did denying even Mueller access to stuff they had which he now gets with a Dem controlled Congress.
So had the prior Repub Congress issued a report based on how they controlled the scope it would obviously give them a potentially different answer than what the Dem's may report based on a much wider search.
Yes, I can agree that the Mueller investigation is far larger in scope, and allows him to bust guys for unrelated crimes they committed decades ago. I can certainly agree to that.
Russian collusion in the 2016 campaign though? Nah. They're pretty much working off of the same information, and are highly unlikely to come to drastically different conclusions.
SO you are another nutter who simply never read or understood the Mueller mandate of his investigation. It is absolute FACT that the crimes he has got convictions or concessions for go to the heart of the key part of his mandate which was 'any links or coordination between the Trump campaign or Trump and Russia'.
Anyone denying Mueller has not busted a boat load of people guilty of that is just in denial.
Yes, I can agree that the Mueller investigation is far larger in scope, and allows him to bust guys for unrelated crimes they committed decades ago. I can certainly agree to that.
Russian collusion in the 2016 campaign though? Nah. They're pretty much working off of the same information, and are highly unlikely to come to drastically different conclusions.
The bipartisan Senate investigation stated that they found no evidence of collusion.
The Senate investigation is not nor does it have any insight/inroads on the independent Mueller investigation. They do not know what Mueller knows.
We'll all just have to wait and see what happens.