Social Even Democrats now agree : No Russian Collusion

[hillelslovak87]

All you guys spiking the football, you do know the Mueller investigation has a larger scope, and he and his team have access to much more information than the Senators, right?

 

[bobgeese]

Trump may get voted out in 2020 or Mueller may seal indictments until after Trump is done, whenever that is and then go after him years from .

You’re embarrassing yourself.

 

[NC252]

I think that we'll know something about it when it's all over.

I hope so. We need to learn about the Genesis of the investigation. About the fisa warrants on Carter page who ironically was never charged with any crime. We need to find out about how George Papadopoulos was set up. We need to know why Rod Rosenstein signed off on a fisa warrant using the Steele dossier as the main source while overseeing Mueller. We need to find out what insurance policy struck and Page were talking about and how far to the top did it go. Hopefully Mueller is on the case.

 

[bobgeese]

All you guys spiking the football, you do know the Mueller investigation has a larger scope, and he and his team have access to much more information than the Senators, right?

 

[JamesRussler]

My statement has nothing to do with faith. He is in charge of the investigation. That investigation is over when he says it's over. What is there to argue? I don't even know what you're talking about, to be honest.

It's very simple, Fog. Mueller lacks transparency and democratic legitimacy. There's no reason to believe he represents your interests, or those of the American Citizens.

 

[Happy Man]

Lol.

Imagine being so Fucking Dumb you fell for this blatant liberal bullshit. Leftist deepstate meets the Democratic Party and liberal media along for the ride too.

 

[computer fogie]

I can only assume that you posted these cute memes as a non-verbal way of saying that you believe Mueller's team does not have access to more info than this investigation, and that it does not have a wider scope? Are you sure about that?

 

[JSnake]

Conned in what way?

Believing the propaganda that Trump was a Russian agent.

 

[JamesRussler]

Holy shit you're still holding onto the Q theory

That's not "Q theory," all of this was proven in sworn testimony and in authenticated documents. I don't know what you're smoking.

 

[58miles]

you are operating under a bunch of stupid assumptions.

First off glad you have backed away from your prior stupid point that 'since the Republican Senate did not find collusion then Mueller will not find it'. Good on you for realizing how stupid that is.

And while a partisan Senate may not impeach (and we all accept that) even if Mueller's report is scathing and filled with proof of collusion that does not end the process. Trump may get voted out in 2020 or Mueller may seal indictments until after Trump is done, whenever that is and then go after him years from now.

Remember the republican lead 'witch hunt' of Bill Clinton for White Water went on 4 years before they got Bill for a blow job. This Trump investigation is not even 2 years old yet. It can have lots of legs yet, and should.

The whole Ken Starr investigation took 4 years, millions of dollars of taxpayer money and all the Republicans had to show for it was 1 criminal conviction and one lie about a blowjob. Let's not even get into the 9 Benghazi congressional hearings which is more congressional hearings than 9/11 got and each hearing of course found Hillary did nothing wrong, which strangely enough didn't stop the Republicans from holding yet another hearing. It's almost enough to make you think that the whole Benghazi thing was just about politics and not about those dead embassy workers?

 

[Bobby 3 Sticks]

That's not "Q theory," all of this was proven in sworn testimony and in authenticated documents. I don't know what you're smoking.

Q is the one saying there's sealed indictments on all "bad" actors. It even believes Mueller is working alongside tRUmp

 

[computer fogie]

It's very simple, Fog. Mueller lacks transparency and democratic legitimacy. There's no reason to believe he represents your interests, or those of the American Citizens.

See, you're still off on a different train of thought. I say Mueller leads the investigation, and will end it when his team is done. You reply with things that show that you don't even understand what I said.

Read my posts, I did not say he represents my interests. But you know that already, and yet you choose to reply with strawman arguments.

 

[NC252]

As I've said previously, the likelihood of the Senate and Mueller investigations coming to wildly different conclusions, is pretty much 0%.

It's over.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw1mcE-5UtnIeBBJqRgt-0Kd&ampcf=1
The house already came to the same conclusion

 

[MikeMcMann]

The fuck's the point of talking to you?

You want to have the fucking last word?

Fine.

Have at it.

Thx. i'll take it.

That any Trumptard think anyone was waiting for this Senate Report like it might have a bombshell leading to Trumps downfalls is just the height of stupidity.

Vegas betting line would have pegged it at zero as no one would have taken the side of the bet that the Republican Senate would 'find' anything on Trump. No shock here at all.

So that Trumptards are dancing over non-news and pretending it has any tie to what Mueller may report is just stupidity.

 

[JamesRussler]

Q is the one saying there's sealed indictments on all "bad" actors. It even believes Mueller is working alongside tRUmp

Maybe you should re-read my post then. I never alluded to any of that nonsense.

 

[hillelslovak87]

Did you create that shitty meme just for me? Either way, it suuuuucks. Save it for your Michael Obama tranny thread, homie.

I'll accept that as a concession of my point.

 

[hillelslovak87]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CRAB&usg=AOvVaw1mcE-5UtnIeBBJqRgt-0Kd&ampcf=1
The house already came to the same conclusion

Which was led by Devin Nunes, noted whore.

 

[JamesRussler]

See, you're still off on a different train of thought. I say Mueller leads the investigation, and will end it when his team is done. You reply with things that show that you don't even understand what I said.

Somehow you don't understand where "faith" comes in.
You have to accept on faith the integrity of Mueller's investigation because it lacks transparency.
You have to accept on faith Mueller's integrity as a public servant because no one—not even you—voted for him.

My question to you is simply this: why?
Why would you trust this strange man named Robert Mueller?

Read my posts, I did not say he represents my interests. But you know that already, and yet you choose to reply with strawman arguments.

I am not making an argument. I asked you a question. Your answer was "Mueller leads the investigation, and will end it when his team is done." Your answer is not responsive; it merely restates the obvious. Please just answer the question.

 

[EradiatedHaggis]

Still waiting for you to address the video in the OP.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Sorry, but Trump is squeaky clean. That's why he never had any real legal troubles until he ran for POTUS.
It all comes down to this entitlement mentality that Democrats have. They feel entitled to a scandal, just like they're entitled to welfare, or an abortion, etc. Because Democrats are so angry at Trump, they conclude there must be something to justify their anger. No, Democrats—that's not the way it works. It's time to grow up.

Get a clue.