- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Messages
- 43,822
- Reaction score
- 15,019
Source on 4chan investigators of Clanton being righties?
I'm talking about the conservative blogs and pages that spread the accusations.
Source on 4chan investigators of Clanton being righties?
The saddest part is that this all is distracting from her day job and depriving the world of her best, most dedicated hair-porn work.This still makes me chuckle and I don't advocate violence against women unless the women have decided to give in to violence themselves. You want equal rights and step up to men as their equal? You want to step into a fight were men are throwing down? OK. Reap what you sow.
Had she stayed home, not taken a glass bottle into battle, picked a better boyfriend (who didn't participate in this nonsense), or attempted to dress, look, and act like a respectable lady she might not have gotten a fist to the dome.
Right on. Considering the MSM didn't report on him, do you think the penetration of the accusation into the public was deep enough to result in many potential jurors in the most liberal part of our country hearing about it?I'm talking about the conservative blogs and pages that spread the accusations.
I'm talking about the conservative blogs and pages that spread the accusations.
Right on. Considering the MSM didn't report on him, do you think the penetration of the accusation into the public was deep enough to result in many potential jurors in the most liberal part of our country hearing about it?
In the US there is a jury
selection/dismissal process by which legal representatives question the potential juror pool on any preconceptions, prior knowledge, etc, and can choose to dismiss jurors. Do you think this process is sufficient to root out jurors who may have heard the accusations and his name prior to the arrest?
The ol' shoot the messenger.
Yes, mindlessly repeating social media accusations (including the fake order of bikelocks) means they are scum.
Who investigated and reported the fake order of bikelocks?
No one. The story was distorted as it was told. The original tweet (now deleted) made it clear that it was trolling. The same bullshit is still being propagated. Typical of these cut and paste, mindless repeaters.
Should we even be talking about it all here? I mean, our discussion might impede a fair trial. I wouldn't want to influence the jury one way or another.
Let's see him maintain his special snowflake ideology when he's in general pop of a pound me in the ass prison getting slung around like a dog toy.
Yeah, I think the posters mindlessly cut and pasting accusations without basic fact checking here are just as bad.
At least this thread is factually about his arrest.
Should social media users play investigator at all ?
Investigating isn't the problem, it's spreading false accusations. If it was really about solving the crime they could have just forwarded the information to the authorities. Obviously those that were distorting the information about /pol's trolling didn't care about the truth at all.
"I identify myself as innocent."I hear that, but considering Berkeley's police dept's eagerness to protect and serve people at these events/protests/riots, I say it was a better option to go viral and apply pressure to catch the perp for this assault.
We'll see what he pleads fri morning.
Investigating isn't the problem, it's spreading false accusations. If it was really about solving the crime they could have just forwarded the information to the authorities. Obviously those that were distorting the information about /pol's trolling didn't care about the truth at all.
Gotcha. I read the article you posted about instances down under and agree it is a troubling trend. The internet age has turned many into investigators, as well as given many a strong fear of making a wrong decision and catching shit from the public online. We need to maintain the ability to think for ourselves, and also follow rules and laws. The times I've served on a jury were awesome experiences and I followed judges instructions to not do independent research honestly. Both cases were civil suits though, and weren't in the media. I can definitely see why a criminal suit regarding a topic that's so public (protests/riots etc) would be tough to deal with.Yes, because even if they aren't mouth breathing social media users, chances of them googling him would be high.
That's the exact problem I'm talking about.
Yeah his progressive ideology will come in handy when black n Hispanic inmates make him their lil white bitch



He never would have been charged if the interweb hadn't done what it did. Never.I hear that, but considering Berkeley's police dept's eagerness to protect and serve people at these events/protests/riots, I say it was a better option to go viral and apply pressure to catch the perp for this assault.
We'll see what he pleads fri morning.