Crime Epstein List drop is in 3... 2... 1.... Tomorrow.

[syct23]

LOL dude, sorry but if someone posts sarcasm in deadpan plain text that indistinguishable from them being serious, then that person is an idiot.

This issue was addressed in the 1990s on the internet: Sarcasm doesn't work online, unless you make absolutely obvious in a caption that you are being sarcastic.

I'm not going to bother reading someone's post history to see what stance they have on a given topic. I'm just going to take their text at face value. And if they're being sarcastic, then they're* an absolute fucking moron.

No You’re a Fucking Moran!

You just acknowledged what I told you yesterday, that you do not bother to do proper research.

Again, you are part of the problem.

You realize this is sherdog bro,

Every Thread is a form of internet sarcasm, with no obvious captions..

Go back to the 90’s, that time seems safer for you..

*clinks glass

 

[HereticBD]

LOL dude, sorry but if someone posts sarcasm in deadpan plain text that indistinguishable from them being serious, then that person is an idiot.

This issue was addressed in the 1990s on the internet: Sarcasm doesn't work online, unless you make absolutely obvious in a caption that you are being sarcastic.

I'm not going to bother reading someone's post history to see what stance they have on a given topic. I'm just going to take their text at face value. And if they're being sarcastic, then they're* an absolute fucking moron.

It wasn't sarcasm, though. He literally just corrected the structure of a post above his, that you were too angry to read. His post had nothing do to with supporting/not supporting Trump. It was just a little gag on the other poster.

Although, to be fair, I'm going to assume you have the poster he was having a bit fun with on "ignore", so maybe you missed the entire chain.

 

[J0N0]

So is today the actual day now? Yep.

Democrats vow to fight Trump officials’ plan to hold back some Epstein documents – as it happened

Lawmakers accuse justice department of defying the Epstein Files Transparency Act

www.theguardian.com

Deputy AG says justice department will release 'several hundred thousand' Epstein files today with more to come​

The deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, has said the justice department will release “several hundred thousand documents” from the Epstein files today but hinted that some may be held back – at least temporarily – citing the need to protect victims.

“I expect that we’re going to release more documents over the next couple of weeks,” he added.

'Several hundred thousand' is not ALL DOCUMENTS per the law which was enacted.

This is just more smoke and mirrors, absolutely disgraceful. I hope the people breaking the law by covering this up will be brought to justice one day, but we all know they won't be.

 

[HOLA]

 

[Alpha_T83]

It wasn't sarcasm, though. He literally just corrected the structure of a post above his, that you were too angry to read. His post had nothing do to with supporting/not supporting Trump. It was just a little gag on the other poster.

Although, to be fair, I'm going to assume you have the poster he was having a bit fun with on "ignore", so maybe you missed the entire chain.

I wasn't the only person that replied to him with a literal interpretation of his post.

If that was his intent, as you are implying, then his post was poorly structured.

I've made this mistake before too. You get drawn into a long series of replies, and you forget there is an onus on us all to make our posts clear as "stand alone content".

 

[Alpha_T83]

'Several hundred thousand' is not ALL DOCUMENTS per the law which was enacted.

This is just more smoke and mirrors, absolutely disgraceful. I hope the people breaking the law by covering this up will be brought to justice one day, but we all know they won't be.

Yea. The explanation they've given is essentially:

"We don't have enough time to review all of the documents before we release them, and we will not release any document we haven't had time to review."

This is explicitly illegal, and if it happens Pam Bondi belongs in prison. But she won't prosecute herself. So ultimately it's up to Congress to hold contempt or impeachment proceedings, and I'm not holding my breath on that one.

 

[J0N0]

Yea. The explanation they've given is essentially:

"We don't have enough time to review all of the documents before we release them, and we will not release any document we haven't had time to review."

This is explicitly illegal, and if it happens Pam Bondi belongs in prison. But she won't prosecute herself. So ultimately it's up to Congress to hold contempt or impeachment proceedings, and I'm not holding my breath on that one.

Where are all those brilliant AI geniuses from DOGE when it comes to a bit of redacting victim names, huh?

I honestly have a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that there are still people defending this. We all have our biases, sure, sunk cost etc.. but I genuinely can't believe people are defending it. I'm genuinely shocked that the reaction isn't unanimous rage.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

have they released a single file yet?

 

[PBAC]

None of these photos mean anything. I'm aware the right need Epstein and trump to be innocent and the left need them to be guilty but going bat shit over nothing burger mundane photos is just desperate on both ends. We know Epstein did what he did so release the real ones instead of riling people up with PG nonsense

 

[Andy Capp]

Deputy AG Todd Blanche says the DOJ will only release a partial batch of the Epstein files today, rather than all of them. Blanche says DOJ needs more time to make redactions. They are ordered to release all the files today. I'm getting sick and tired of this f'n administration and their handling of the files.

Only "getting"? I got there quite a while ago.

 

[Satanical Eve]

FROM THE EPSTEIN FILES: During one of Doe's encounters with Epstein, he took her to Mar-a-Lago where he introduced her to its owner, Donald J. Trump. Introducing 14-year-old Doe to Donald J. Trump, Epstein elbowed Trump playfully asking him, referring to Doe, "This is a good one, right?" Trump smiled and nodded in agreement. They both chuckled and Doe felt uncomfortable, but, at the time, was too young to understand why.

 

[WhiteMousse]

Lmfao

 

[Jacket time]

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

Where are all those brilliant AI geniuses from DOGE when it comes to a bit of redacting victim names, huh?

I honestly have a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that there are still people defending this. We all have our biases, sure, sunk cost etc.. but I genuinely can't believe people are defending it. I'm genuinely shocked that the reaction isn't unanimous rage.

Defending it after sabre rattling about taking down the global cabal of the pdf elites for a decade.

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

Lmfao

Stormy Daniels and Melania both had to hear that while he mounted them.

 

[N13]

Names appearing in the newly released Epstein photos
• Bill Clinton
• Michael Jackson
• Kevin Spacey
• Mick Jagger
• Andrew Mountbatten‑Windsor
• Bill Gates
• Noam Chomsky
• Steve Bannon
• Richard Branson
• Larry Summers
• Woody Allen
• Donald Trump

Important Context
Being in a photo with Epstein does not imply criminal activity.
Many images are simply social settings, travel photos, or event snapshots.
The House Oversight Committee also notes that:
• Many faces are redacted
• Photos are undated
• No context is provided for when or why the individuals were present

Summary: Who appears the most?
Based strictly on the reporting:
Bill Clinton — by far the most photos
Woody Allen — confirmed in multiple photos
Michael Jackson & Kevin Spacey — appear in several photos

 

[Jacket time]

 

[johnsmithjohnson]

Pretty sure it's the main complex on the southern island on the south east side.
The three were very blaise about it. It was Lolita Island serviced by the lolita express.

 

[Alpha_T83]

have they released a single file yet?

Yes. And one file about a grand jury in NY was 119 pages of fully blacked out pages.

Pam Bondi has broken the law, so now we see if Congress follows through and impeaches her or holds her in contempt. I'm not holding my breath.

 

[N13]

Yes. And one file about a grand jury in NY was 119 pages of fully blacked out pages.

That is what we need to see. It is the evidence that put Epstein in prison.