- Joined
- Dec 8, 2011
- Messages
- 24,972
- Reaction score
- 1,193
My issue with that is you can have an ancestor, but you are not Native American. You shouldn't be adding it as part of your brand and delivering that message to institutions. You can't be 1/32 of something six generations ago, at best, and claim it in any relevance.
Why not? Honest question.
Just sharing a personal fact (probably for no relevant reason) but I am in the same exact boat as Warren. I'm mostly Irish, German and Polish but we found out that I have a Native American Ancestor when my grandmother hired pros do a background search on our family history.
I never identify as NA but quite frankly I don't identify strongly with anything other than being an American and a New Yorker. I identify with my profession, being a dad and a husband, being an athlete (aging one at that) but I don't think ancestry is important at all to my life. But I do totally get why it is for a lot of people. I just don't think claiming to be a NA when you have that in your DNA is as big a deal as people are making it out to be.
Awesome. Maybe I read too far into your post earlier.I do agree with this part though. On paper I think she is arguably one of if not the best overall candidates on both sides which I think I've argued here before. I don't think it should be brought up at all during the campaign (but I am sure someone will). Though it is hard for me to look past someone so blatantly white having laid claims to being Native American, when they seem so obviously white. Or for her to say she had no idea it was being reference or mentioned just sounds completely bogus altogether. Last thing I want to see is another person on a microphone telling half truths.